@TheMouse However, I have only set some clear scoring requirements for this situational question (such as a speed score of ≥ 7 and a mobility score of ≥ 5), and added some hidden points (completing a situational emergency requires 5 points, which is generally a more stringent scoring standard, such as a mobility score of ≥ 8). How to obtain hidden points will be prompted in the context, and finally, the aircraft characteristics will be evaluated (such as whether it is a stealth aircraft, whether it is an electronic warfare aircraft, etc.). This is another hidden point, which is also 5)
@TheMouse I have set its explosionscale to 15, so there should be no problem of no damage.
But I can't understand why it can instantly kill an aircraft with 9E+35 health of all parts
@Rb2h The sixth generation jet is indeed a good idea, but I think it is difficult for us to replicate the more intelligent features of the sixth generation machine, and we can only obtain an empty shell. To be honest, if you can't reach the referee's G-spot, it's difficult to widen the gap in "appearance" score through this, and instead, it's easy to be surpassed by the fourth generation aircraft (Russian standard) that places more emphasis on weapon mounting and mobility. This is determined by the rules and characteristics of this game.
@GeneralCorpInc If you think the maneuverability is too high, you can restore the main wing volume to normal size and reduce the area, reducing the wing thickness. However, in pursuit of authenticity, the maneuverability of this missile is low, the feel is not good, and due to the large turning radius, it may be difficult to hit close range targets.
@GeneralCorpInc Missiles first target and then launch.
Suicide drones are launched first, fly to a location, and then select a target.
Suicide drones are designed with humans in the loop, and humans choose their targets.
TV guided missiles are more like suicide drones.
Tomahawk Block4, LRAM, like an intelligent version of a suicide drone.
@Someonefun What can I say... I'm not sure if there are similar ones in other countries, but I use video websites in China to watch tutorials, watch explanations and ask questions to veteran players in forums, ask questions to veteran players in social media group chats, and read the tutorial files they leave there
@Speedhunter yeah, this also makes it very OP. Moreover, the speed and maneuverability of this aircraft are also excellent, with even automatic ejection, HMDS, and vertical takeoff and landing. It is not just a missile truck, but also a strong point in comprehensive air combat.
@TheMouse Compared to the experimental version, the final version adopts three suggestions from you and @TheUltimatePlaneLover
-Two of the flames on the left wing are detached, make sure to reconnect those
-Perhaps add an orbit camera in the center of the aircraft to have a more stable orbit view
And replace faulty weapons
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Well bro, I'm facing a Huge Trouble I find it difficult to test the new version of T-3 because it has a total of 827 parts. I need someone to help me with the testing. I originally intended to use an opportunity to participate in the competition and have the organizer help me test it, but I realized that there are still many works that have not been rated, which means the organizer may not have time. So I hope you can help me test this plane.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Me? Fine, although my entry T-3 did indeed modify someone else's plane, the completion level of that plane was very low, and I made a lot of changes. To be honest, the completion level of the A40C is already very high, and I can't think of any further improvement. The maneuverability and appearance are excellent, and if we really need to make modifications, we can only remake the drone and install intelligent weapons. Moreover, it is unknown whether the second version of T-3 can be released before the deadline, so I apologize that I cannot do so
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, your aircraft is excellent in terms of weapons and maneuverability. While Mobius stands out in appearance, there are significant deficiencies in its maneuverability. Unless special means (Like AOA) are used, it will lose a lot of points as a result. This is our only opportunity. Mobius's design goes beyond traditional concepts, and adding weapons would be troublesome and difficult to achieve as yours. The only problem is that we are not sure what weapons Mobius will be equipped with, after all, there was a work that only used two small nuclear bombs and received 7 points for "weapons", which is the same score as me (I still remember it to this day)
@TheUltimatePlaneLover In fact, I am also modifying my plane. The problem with Mobius is that its weapons are too single (only automatic machine guns), which means that its next version will definitely score more on "weapons" (yes, there will be a second version) and at least improve by about two points. So 41 is actually the lowest possible score I think Mobius will get, which is also the reason why I am very worried, so I am eager to know the score of your plane
I don't know what to say, but OP that go crazy. It has super maneuverability and bomber like weapons, and even drones (although I think this can be improved). This powerful fighter jet, I think, is fully capable of confronting Mobius (Mobius transcends the concept of traditional fighter jets).
@TheMouse Okay, it seems that the score for automatic ejection is already included in the extra. Let me think, I can't make further improvements to the plane, so I can't improve my look score. Other... what kind of weapon can get 9… Try my best.
@TheMouse Due to changes in the situation, besides machine guns and nuclear bombs, I have decided to manufacture a third major weapon. I hope they can get me 39.
By the way, can the automatic ejection system earn extra points?
@TheMouse I have seen that UFO and it is very good, even making me wonder if I should remake a plane. In fact, the author of A40 thinks so. But unfortunately, I really don't have time to improve the T-3 body again. It's already very good, and I can only make improvements to the weapon. I can't even be sure if the high parts weapons I make will satisfy you.
@TheMouse Oh! I am glad to hear this news. In fact, I found that the rotary machine gun I made has a risk of jamming due to its high firing rate, which greatly limits its performance.
@TheMouse em… In fact, I replaced the weapons I used and replaced the cluster bombs with a nuclear bomb. But in order to earn an extra point in the extra, I decided to create an interesting design.
@TheMouse ... I thought cluster bomb would be enough for OP. Okay, I will upload another version. I need to make a special machine gun (although it still doesn't meet the requirements)
@Majakalona em…Sorry," it may sometimes "rubber band" manuever thing"I dont understand what do you mean. Is it severe shaking, stalling, or something else?
I only know that this aircraft will stall at speeds above 1500 kilometers per hour, and this issue has been fixed
@Mousewithamachinegun122 Can I separate the weapons so that you can reinstall them yourself during testing to avoid the issue of the 700 parts upper limit?
I originally wanted to see the specific content of your lore, but I couldn't find any more text. I only know the information provided in your two account profiles
@TheMouse However, I have only set some clear scoring requirements for this situational question (such as a speed score of ≥ 7 and a mobility score of ≥ 5), and added some hidden points (completing a situational emergency requires 5 points, which is generally a more stringent scoring standard, such as a mobility score of ≥ 8). How to obtain hidden points will be prompted in the context, and finally, the aircraft characteristics will be evaluated (such as whether it is a stealth aircraft, whether it is an electronic warfare aircraft, etc.). This is another hidden point, which is also 5)
+1Happy birthday!
+1@OkaNieba Well, thank you for correcting it. I am using a translator, so there may be a problem with it
+1It seems that you have many misunderstandings about the J-16, such as the fact that it doesn't have airspeed tube at all.
+1Su30？
+1There is a part in the machine gun position of the nose that is not connected
+1The original product of that automatic anti-aircraft cannon is here
+1@HanakoSan @Randomplayer @TheMouse
@HanakoSan I haven't changed it, so its value is still 1. Anyway, thank you for your explanation
+1@TheMouse I have set its explosionscale to 15, so there should be no problem of no damage.
+1But I can't understand why it can instantly kill an aircraft with 9E+35 health of all parts
@HanakoSan Sorry, but I don't know what "impactDamageScalar" is. I know this, but I don't know its purpose.
+1@Rb2h The sixth generation jet is indeed a good idea, but I think it is difficult for us to replicate the more intelligent features of the sixth generation machine, and we can only obtain an empty shell. To be honest, if you can't reach the referee's G-spot, it's difficult to widen the gap in "appearance" score through this, and instead, it's easy to be surpassed by the fourth generation aircraft (Russian standard) that places more emphasis on weapon mounting and mobility. This is determined by the rules and characteristics of this game.
+1@GeneralCorpInc If you think the maneuverability is too high, you can restore the main wing volume to normal size and reduce the area, reducing the wing thickness. However, in pursuit of authenticity, the maneuverability of this missile is low, the feel is not good, and due to the large turning radius, it may be difficult to hit close range targets.
+1@GeneralCorpInc Missiles first target and then launch.
+1Suicide drones are launched first, fly to a location, and then select a target.
Suicide drones are designed with humans in the loop, and humans choose their targets.
TV guided missiles are more like suicide drones.
Tomahawk Block4, LRAM, like an intelligent version of a suicide drone.
So you want us to help you complete a hand-operated missile? Okay, I'm a bit busy right now. If no one helps you after two days, I'll try to help
+1@Someonefun What can I say... I'm not sure if there are similar ones in other countries, but I use video websites in China to watch tutorials, watch explanations and ask questions to veteran players in forums, ask questions to veteran players in social media group chats, and read the tutorial files they leave there
+1@Speedhunter yeah, this also makes it very OP. Moreover, the speed and maneuverability of this aircraft are also excellent, with even automatic ejection, HMDS, and vertical takeoff and landing. It is not just a missile truck, but also a strong point in comprehensive air combat.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thanks bro. Let's meet at the peak.
+1@TheMouse I use nuclear missile instead of timed nuclear bomb. Remember not to get too close to the target.
+1@TheMouse Compared to the experimental version, the final version adopts three suggestions from you and @TheUltimatePlaneLover
+1-Two of the flames on the left wing are detached, make sure to reconnect those
-Perhaps add an orbit camera in the center of the aircraft to have a more stable orbit view
And replace faulty weapons
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Well bro, I'm facing a Huge Trouble I find it difficult to test the new version of T-3 because it has a total of 827 parts. I need someone to help me with the testing. I originally intended to use an opportunity to participate in the competition and have the organizer help me test it, but I realized that there are still many works that have not been rated, which means the organizer may not have time. So I hope you can help me test this plane.
+1Previously: Will the limit of 1000 parts be too high?
+1After calculation: How can I compress it to a thousand parts and still run normally
So busy... If I upload my work on May 9th and don't receive a rating on May 10th, will I lose eligibility?
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Congratulations, bro! It's almost impossible for anyone to get 10, the first place is already in your bag.
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thank you for your trust, bro. But the more crucial issue is that I don't have time
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Me? Fine, although my entry T-3 did indeed modify someone else's plane, the completion level of that plane was very low, and I made a lot of changes. To be honest, the completion level of the A40C is already very high, and I can't think of any further improvement. The maneuverability and appearance are excellent, and if we really need to make modifications, we can only remake the drone and install intelligent weapons. Moreover, it is unknown whether the second version of T-3 can be released before the deadline, so I apologize that I cannot do so
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover Yes, your aircraft is excellent in terms of weapons and maneuverability. While Mobius stands out in appearance, there are significant deficiencies in its maneuverability. Unless special means (Like AOA) are used, it will lose a lot of points as a result. This is our only opportunity. Mobius's design goes beyond traditional concepts, and adding weapons would be troublesome and difficult to achieve as yours. The only problem is that we are not sure what weapons Mobius will be equipped with, after all, there was a work that only used two small nuclear bombs and received 7 points for "weapons", which is the same score as me (I still remember it to this day)
+1@TheUltimatePlaneLover In fact, I am also modifying my plane. The problem with Mobius is that its weapons are too single (only automatic machine guns), which means that its next version will definitely score more on "weapons" (yes, there will be a second version) and at least improve by about two points. So 41 is actually the lowest possible score I think Mobius will get, which is also the reason why I am very worried, so I am eager to know the score of your plane
+1I am looking forward to the final score of this aircraft and hope it can reach 41
+1I don't know what to say, but OP that go crazy. It has super maneuverability and bomber like weapons, and even drones (although I think this can be improved). This powerful fighter jet, I think, is fully capable of confronting Mobius (Mobius transcends the concept of traditional fighter jets).
+1@TheMouse Okay, it seems that the score for automatic ejection is already included in the extra. Let me think, I can't make further improvements to the plane, so I can't improve my look score. Other... what kind of weapon can get 9… Try my best.
+1@TheMouse Due to changes in the situation, besides machine guns and nuclear bombs, I have decided to manufacture a third major weapon. I hope they can get me 39.
+1By the way, can the automatic ejection system earn extra points?
@TheMouse I have seen that UFO and it is very good, even making me wonder if I should remake a plane. In fact, the author of A40 thinks so. But unfortunately, I really don't have time to improve the T-3 body again. It's already very good, and I can only make improvements to the weapon. I can't even be sure if the high parts weapons I make will satisfy you.
+1@TheMouse Oh! I am glad to hear this news. In fact, I found that the rotary machine gun I made has a risk of jamming due to its high firing rate, which greatly limits its performance.
+1@TheMouse em… In fact, I replaced the weapons I used and replaced the cluster bombs with a nuclear bomb. But in order to earn an extra point in the extra, I decided to create an interesting design.
+1@TheMouse I have another question. Can you explain in more detail how to determine OP weapons?
+1@TheMouse ... I thought cluster bomb would be enough for OP. Okay, I will upload another version. I need to make a special machine gun (although it still doesn't meet the requirements)
+1@Majakalona Okay, it seems that the problem is easier than I imagined. Thank you for your help
+1@Majakalona …god. Always or any under special circumstances?
+1@Majakalona em…Sorry," it may sometimes "rubber band" manuever thing"I dont understand what do you mean. Is it severe shaking, stalling, or something else?
+1I only know that this aircraft will stall at speeds above 1500 kilometers per hour, and this issue has been fixed
@Majakalona Thanks man, I really need your help.
+1@GabrielSatori Welcome back. I can't wait to read carefully, but unfortunately, I'm already going to bed. I will check again tomorrow morning
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 Ok…I think the final product may only have 500 more parts
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 Can I separate the weapons so that you can reinstall them yourself during testing to avoid the issue of the 700 parts upper limit?
+1@Mousewithamachinegun122 OK thanks
+1em…What does overpowered mean? Simply more powerful weapons and maneuverability?
+1@IQinventory Sorry, I'm referring to the Air Force emblem. In my impression, it is composed of red and yellow
+1A completely symmetrical cockpit…
+1@OPTICJATT Now only you know
+1The fact once again proves that the purpose of Simpleplanes is beyond my understanding
+1事实再一次刷新了我对简单飞机用途的认识
I originally wanted to see the specific content of your lore, but I couldn't find any more text. I only know the information provided in your two account profiles
+1