All credit goes to @ForeverPie for this paragraph, he wrote all of it in his post, I just want to put his words out there.
To be honest, not much is going to come out of this, at least not in the first few weeks. However, I think as soon as it is cleared in the supreme court (a stupid decision if you ask me since it rids us of some freedoms that the court is supposed to protect), the major ISPs and internet companies will immediately take advantage of throttling. However, I think it will mainly be news and moderately-large websites that are affected. SimplePlanes is safe, because it is simply too small, and virtually nobody has heard of it.
The internet companies were the only people who supported repealing net neutrality, and for good reason. They want to monopolize the internet. Remember a few years ago when the supreme court stopped Comcast and Time-Warner from merging? Well, now the net neutrality thing made it easier for now Spectrum and Comcast to try again, making the ultimate internet/cable monopoly. Verizon, AT&T, and others are also now in total control of what we do online. This will kill domestic competition from all areas, and our economy will therefore ultimately crash if it's as extreme as people say it will be. Small businesses will be destroyed as well.
Despite millions of petitions (not including the 2 million false ones) against net neutrality, pro net neutrality propaganda, multiple death threats, a bomb threat, and over 20,000 letters written to the FCC to keep net neutrality, the FCC decided to end it, despite more than radical measures taken by the citizens. This is unacceptable in my opinion, and should be taken seriously by the Supreme court, as well as the senate.
FCC chairman Ajit Pai was appointed by Donald Trump, as his predecessor was appointed by Barack Obama. This means when we elected Trump, we elected Pai, so Pai, as chairman of the FCC, should have the FCC represent the American people, not big biz interests (which BTW is completely against the founding fathers vision for America). Also, Pai made a public video where he actually made fun of people who were for net neutrality. I believe Pai has no interest in the People's interests, but that is just an opinion. However, I see where Pai is coming from. The basis for the 2015 Net Neutrality laws were founded off of the Communications Act of 1934, which are old rules. Still though, they are needed rules and they do not need to be edited since Net Neutrality passed in 2015
Tú-144 was first ssc plane, although Russian spies gathered many documents and blueprints on the Concorde and it was all copied. It's first flight was 3 months before the Concordes, but the Tú-144 was pretty horrible, uncomfortable, flawed, and loud.@grantflys
Yeah@VladlHoff
Np@TMach5
Yes, that's good, so I'm guessing that congress is for Net neutrality then?@ForeverPie
What congress is suing the FCC?@ForeverPie
Yup@Awsomur
Np man@KHH
Np man@Mostly
Edgy
Those gosh darn liberal gun owners!@BaconEggs
Intensifies@BaconEggs
any progress? @MrVaultech
What's up@ForeverPie
Yes it is @Awsomur
I usually try not to do it @Awsomur
Hi@ForeverPie
I think we still have new neutrality@FlyingThings
Mostly @PorkyClown3
It got repealed, we are saved@PorkyClown3
Nevermind it got repealed, we still have it
You sure?@PorkyClown3
I'll check out your link@TheLatentImage
Ok@TheLatentImage
All credit goes to @ForeverPie for this paragraph, he wrote all of it in his post, I just want to put his words out there.
To be honest, not much is going to come out of this, at least not in the first few weeks. However, I think as soon as it is cleared in the supreme court (a stupid decision if you ask me since it rids us of some freedoms that the court is supposed to protect), the major ISPs and internet companies will immediately take advantage of throttling. However, I think it will mainly be news and moderately-large websites that are affected. SimplePlanes is safe, because it is simply too small, and virtually nobody has heard of it.
The internet companies were the only people who supported repealing net neutrality, and for good reason. They want to monopolize the internet. Remember a few years ago when the supreme court stopped Comcast and Time-Warner from merging? Well, now the net neutrality thing made it easier for now Spectrum and Comcast to try again, making the ultimate internet/cable monopoly. Verizon, AT&T, and others are also now in total control of what we do online. This will kill domestic competition from all areas, and our economy will therefore ultimately crash if it's as extreme as people say it will be. Small businesses will be destroyed as well.
Despite millions of petitions (not including the 2 million false ones) against net neutrality, pro net neutrality propaganda, multiple death threats, a bomb threat, and over 20,000 letters written to the FCC to keep net neutrality, the FCC decided to end it, despite more than radical measures taken by the citizens. This is unacceptable in my opinion, and should be taken seriously by the Supreme court, as well as the senate.
FCC chairman Ajit Pai was appointed by Donald Trump, as his predecessor was appointed by Barack Obama. This means when we elected Trump, we elected Pai, so Pai, as chairman of the FCC, should have the FCC represent the American people, not big biz interests (which BTW is completely against the founding fathers vision for America). Also, Pai made a public video where he actually made fun of people who were for net neutrality. I believe Pai has no interest in the People's interests, but that is just an opinion. However, I see where Pai is coming from. The basis for the 2015 Net Neutrality laws were founded off of the Communications Act of 1934, which are old rules. Still though, they are needed rules and they do not need to be edited since Net Neutrality passed in 2015
Also I know but I just need to put it out there, it really gets me mad@PorkyClown3
Thank you@TheLatentImage
Good one @ForeverPie
Lol@ForeverPie
We sure are@MrDoolittle
Wish there was weapons but still great build
+1Sexy
Np@EpicPigster1
Alright then@MrVaultech
Yeah, I can agree with that @MrVaultech
Would we base it after other experimental German Prototypes?
That seems great@MrVaultech
I love German engineering just too put it out there @MrVaultech
What do you want to work on if you do?@MrVaultech
Any @WaffleCakes
Pretty good man@KHH
P47 rant man?
Amazing as always
Super hard to fly
Drawing*
I replicated your build @DestinyAviation
Fat boy@phanps
It's ok@LeoTanaka2243
You can add my description in yours @grantflys
Tú-144 was first ssc plane, although Russian spies gathered many documents and blueprints on the Concorde and it was all copied. It's first flight was 3 months before the Concordes, but the Tú-144 was pretty horrible, uncomfortable, flawed, and loud.@grantflys
The engine is supposed to have two props
I think it's smoke launchers @GermanWarMachine