51.4k JoshuaW Comments

  • Gs(experimental) 3 9.9 years ago

    Thank you very much,TheBuilder,but I don't understand what do you mean by"wing strut opattent", could you explain it a bit more clearly? Thanks again.

  • 13,600 mph rocket 9.9 years ago

    So many of this kind of toys using detached engines,not interesting at all.

  • B-2 Stealth Bomber (Final Update) World Record!! 9.9 years ago

    The original plane is made by me but I haven't seen any words of crediting.

  • SU-47 over1200mph 9.9 years ago

    Yes the coM is a bit too close to the coL ,so just move the lower nozzles forward making them near the intakes, it will be much stabler

  • F-15 v1.3 still over 1200mph 9.9 years ago

    Certainly, all my fighters turn perfectly even at the speed over 1200mph

  • SU-47 Berkhut 9.9 years ago

    Just look at this and find out the difference https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/93b3Bu/Nasassin-look-at-this

  • The Flash 9.9 years ago

    And this painting color make me wondering,may I know where you are from?

  • The Flash 9.9 years ago

    So happy to see my F15,and to my surprise that it doesn't broke with such an insane power

  • Monarch 9.9 years ago

    I would never have the idea to make such a beautiful plane, 5stars !!

  • Big Bird Bomber 9.9 years ago

    Oh I love your planes so much they are so beautiful and creative

  • 2000+ mph jet v2 9.9 years ago

    I am sorry that your plane make my phone slow in medium graphic, so I can't help you directly. But I have some exp for improve handling: put your COM a bit farther from the control surfaces on the tail,and don't put the COL too far nor too close to the COM,try making the red ball center being at about the edge of blue ball . Area of control surfaces is not the most important,the location of the wings and balls is

  • 2000+ mph jet v2 9.9 years ago

    if you have used detachable engine, just take off the engines on your plane,especially the big ones ,they are heavy and make much drag.

  • Quadcopter 9.9 years ago

    Very good design but why not use a VTOL engine? RCN will help a lot with controlling.

  • Over The 1300MPH ver.2 9.9 years ago

    Actually the amount of engines is not the key for speed,because more engines need more intakes and make more drag.My SU47 has the similar speed with yours but it only has 3 engines . I think it hard to make a plane with usual appearance much faster than 1200mph.

  • Purple castrato BETA 9.9 years ago

    Amazing looks but can't run on the phone

  • SU-47 over1200mph 9.9 years ago

    primary wing as main wing will certainly break in high speed, I have to use structural wings.

  • SU-47 over1200mph 9.9 years ago

    Actually I have another version a bit more maneuverable but this v6.1 looks better https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/F5aD4x/SU-47-Active

  • F-86 Sabre 9.9 years ago

    Very beautiful plane. It will break easily with low graphic setting on android,but after turning the graphic into medium ,it flies fluently .

  • SU-47 over1200mph 9.9 years ago

    Is the nose cone really more attractive than my plane??just kidding. Longer nose cone is in the older game edition,and I took it from a plane on the net.Just take the nose cone and put it into sub assemblies so you can use it on your plane.

  • Azmo-1 (1100+) 9.9 years ago

    replace your main wings into structural wings,put the rolling control on the horizontal stabilizer, and make the horizontal stabilizer smaller,that might help. Also I wonder if your intakes are enough for your engines. good luck