Also why are you still going on about how I claimed its stolen when we've established it isnt, you're just dumb to think that disconnecting a cockpit would actually compress the file size, I can ask literally anyone else rn and they would tell you, you are wrong
@Aga2003 I play mobile too lol, so what you're saying is you're intentionally hiding your part count of your builds to get more downloads, ask literally anyone else in this community and they will tell you that this doesn't work that way
The reason you think this works is because it voids the check that the website makes for higher part creations, so when you disconnect the cockpit this warning for high part creations will not show because you made the website think it's only one part, I'm sure if you post this normally with the cockpit connected that the website will flag this as high part
my proof here, besides that if this really was a feature compress part counts. why aren't other people doing it. surely in the 10 years this game has existed someone would have already made awareness to this, i can also bet i've been playing this game longer than you
This build is still 2000 parts, the 1 part thing is just because the cockpit isn't connected to the build, the part count number is in relation to how many parts are connected to the cockpit, not how many parts are in the creation it's self. i can guarantee most mobile users can't run this because of it's performance cost. the performance cost is what you should focus on instead of the part count
@Aga2003 you realize the build is still at 2000 parts right? Disconnecting the cockpit does absolutely nothing. So in fact most people can't run this lmao
@MyBelovedHoshimachi so i don't know if you know about this trick or not but you can remove a cockpit from an already posted build and save the entire build as a sub assembly. and then reupload it, the 1 part listed below looks really sus and is why i thought it's potentially stolen
that's fine to like fictional cars @MasterPlanes101. i'm just saying most of them are just based on Ferrari's/Lamborghini's and they're only fictional to avoid copyright and are not fictional for reason of originality, especially GTA 5 online cars
@Aga2003 oh so you are trying to hide it from people so get more downloads.
Even the the performance cost is exactly the same regardless
@Graingy bro thinks disconnecting a cockpit from a 2000 part build compresses the file to 1 part and makes it run better
@Graingy get a load of this guy
Also why are you still going on about how I claimed its stolen when we've established it isnt, you're just dumb to think that disconnecting a cockpit would actually compress the file size, I can ask literally anyone else rn and they would tell you, you are wrong
Love it man
+1That's just really sad honestly
@Aga2003 I play mobile too lol, so what you're saying is you're intentionally hiding your part count of your builds to get more downloads, ask literally anyone else in this community and they will tell you that this doesn't work that way
That looks really good, Tag me when it comes out
Good on you for making an effort to change tho, i respect it
+1The reason you think this works is because it voids the check that the website makes for higher part creations, so when you disconnect the cockpit this warning for high part creations will not show because you made the website think it's only one part, I'm sure if you post this normally with the cockpit connected that the website will flag this as high part
my proof here, besides that if this really was a feature compress part counts. why aren't other people doing it. surely in the 10 years this game has existed someone would have already made awareness to this, i can also bet i've been playing this game longer than you
This build is still 2000 parts, the 1 part thing is just because the cockpit isn't connected to the build, the part count number is in relation to how many parts are connected to the cockpit, not how many parts are in the creation it's self. i can guarantee most mobile users can't run this because of it's performance cost. the performance cost is what you should focus on instead of the part count
Part count doesn't determine how a build runs, performance cost does
+1@Aga2003 you realize the build is still at 2000 parts right? Disconnecting the cockpit does absolutely nothing. So in fact most people can't run this lmao
+1@MyBelovedHoshimachi also can you show me how to get banned as many times as you?
@MyBelovedHoshimachi so i don't know if you know about this trick or not but you can remove a cockpit from an already posted build and save the entire build as a sub assembly. and then reupload it, the 1 part listed below looks really sus and is why i thought it's potentially stolen
that's fine to like fictional cars @MasterPlanes101. i'm just saying most of them are just based on Ferrari's/Lamborghini's and they're only fictional to avoid copyright and are not fictional for reason of originality, especially GTA 5 online cars
@Graingy Fat turret
+1Makes me want to make fat turret
+7why do i feel like this was stolen
+2@LunarEclipseSP honestly it looks more like a Lotus
+3NGL these look bland, all i see is Ferrari and Lamborghini based cars
+1I will never understand how you make things so big, it's like you just scale your builds up when your done with them to 1.5x everytime.
+2all Mapa did was make incredibly out of scale aircrafts
+15I have no idea who the top 3 are
+2@GuardianAerospace Master Shake Supremacy declares war on all opposing refreshments
+1@TheGliderGuy Very nice build
+1Glider time
The Bone Supremacy
+1T
+1Looking forward to it
+1oh no he's leaving
use !
Good
+1Love the build buddy
The Bone
+1Big step down from Grumman lol
The flying pencil
+1I like this
+2I'm an 8 year Pianist
@TheMouse Yes
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Tomska is funny
I like Planes
+1Nice i turned 3 years old the other day
+1Skibidi Mig-25
Love the Car mate
+1@LunarEclipseSP This is a United States FIghter Weapons School Trainer From 1993-1995, This airframe was apart of Adversary BadCats
+1@ToeTips I've spent about almost 2 years on this plane
countermeasures also are in the wrong spot as well
+1