@PlanesOfNewton Your honestly a horrible person. Because someone has ASD doesn't make them a lowlife. Most of your comments are purely hate. You just prey on everyone you come in contact with, and hope you won't be caught out. Thankfully I'm reasonable in an argue meant, so just - Stop now. Really after reading your recent comments here I've come to DESPISE you to the bottom of my heart, which is a relatively hard thing to achieve, so congratulations vile thing.
@chaseharbaugh Well. VTOLs in simple planes are, VERY WEIGHT. For some reason everything is weighted backwards...so my idea of a very symettric VTOL was thrown, I couldn't balance it any more than this without destroying the design.
@PlanesOfNewton honestly, go away. Your not presenting any valid points, your only way of talking is 'OH YEAH, YOU HAVE BAD ENGLISH, AND IM A GOOD PERSON, YOUR NOT'
Litterally, thats all that your comments have been.
@PlanesOfOld maybe calm down. Some bad comments isn't something to throw a wobbly over. One of my light planes was prone to going down a bit so someone gave it 4 stars, I didn't throw a wobbly because they had a problem with it. I do accept newton was a bit wrong, but I agree bray was reasonable. To get 5 stars really a plane should: 1)Look good. 2)Fly easily. 3)Meet any challenges it set itself (E.G. look like the plane its meant to be)
@PlanesOfOld I do Simpleplanes on IOS as well, and I could do with some help, how do you do that thing where the bodies of the planes are made from really smooth wings?
@PlanesOfOld Hyper realistic series rely on THE ENTIRE plane, being very realistic (And if meant to be a hyper realistic real plane then to be like the real plane was) your series you'll want to make sure to mention is about cockpit view.
Also it states that its 'hyper realistic' yet which is partially why im more critical of this one in particular...because shaping of bits on the wings, odd bits elsewhere, and the overral painting isn't...as it was,
@Eric314 2 faults, which I wouldn't say are minor, and I gave it 2 stars, thats just below 'good' really.
also, @PlanesOfOld you can have an opinion to, thats what voting is for, you can give it 5 stars, but as I think its just not in my opinion as good as its said to be... Anyway, you can give any rating on a plane, or they'd not allow you to give below 3 stars...Its rude if you give it a harsh rating without and justification or reasons.
@eric314 on google images, the wings DO look bigger, it may be the lack of a curve on the end like on the real fairly that causes them to look smaller. I admit not noticing it saying new era correct paint BUT after checking the new era paint on google images, it still appears a bit over dramatic in the colour difference. He could have made the colours blend more if he did panelled wings.
Hey guys, a challenge I give out to all of you, make an EVEN MORE fuel efficient plane than this one, it'll be hard. It must be able to take off on its own, and be able to land.
@PlanesOfOld what powers your propellor?
@PlanesOfOld but he's still a horrid person for what he's done. Reputation is certainly what he's gained.
@Electra10 he's just a horrid person. He believes being autistic mis a bad thing and makes you a lowlife. God almighty I despise him solidly now.
@PlanesOfNewton Your honestly a horrible person. Because someone has ASD doesn't make them a lowlife. Most of your comments are purely hate. You just prey on everyone you come in contact with, and hope you won't be caught out. Thankfully I'm reasonable in an argue meant, so just - Stop now. Really after reading your recent comments here I've come to DESPISE you to the bottom of my heart, which is a relatively hard thing to achieve, so congratulations vile thing.
@PlanwsOfNewton has been reported for well, just unfairly downrating LOTS of planes by other users.
I more meant the windscreen @JMicah4
Could you make a detailed cockpit version @PlanesOfOld ?
Wings and back are good, but well... The front is a letdown.
Awesome cockpit as always. It's be cool if you could try an ultralight airplane.
@PlanesOfOld I have ASD to, but you have to TRY to remain calm. Also would you check out my latest plane.
@PlanesOfOld you were a bit aggressive to him to though. He was mean, but you were mean back.
@chaseharbaugh Well. VTOLs in simple planes are, VERY WEIGHT. For some reason everything is weighted backwards...so my idea of a very symettric VTOL was thrown, I couldn't balance it any more than this without destroying the design.
I like a lot of it, but crucially. Windscreen is such a letdown.
Could you explain Full Deflection Elevators Pros
@PlanesOfNewton honestly, go away. Your not presenting any valid points, your only way of talking is 'OH YEAH, YOU HAVE BAD ENGLISH, AND IM A GOOD PERSON, YOUR NOT' Litterally, thats all that your comments have been.
Cool. Quick question, how do you add modded things into your IOS simple planes?
@PlanesOfOld maybe calm down. Some bad comments isn't something to throw a wobbly over. One of my light planes was prone to going down a bit so someone gave it 4 stars, I didn't throw a wobbly because they had a problem with it. I do accept newton was a bit wrong, but I agree bray was reasonable. To get 5 stars really a plane should: 1)Look good. 2)Fly easily. 3)Meet any challenges it set itself (E.G. look like the plane its meant to be)
@PlanesOfOld I do Simpleplanes on IOS as well, and I could do with some help, how do you do that thing where the bodies of the planes are made from really smooth wings?
@PlanesOfOld Hyper realistic series rely on THE ENTIRE plane, being very realistic (And if meant to be a hyper realistic real plane then to be like the real plane was) your series you'll want to make sure to mention is about cockpit view.
Also it states that its 'hyper realistic' yet which is partially why im more critical of this one in particular...because shaping of bits on the wings, odd bits elsewhere, and the overral painting isn't...as it was,
@Eric314 2 faults, which I wouldn't say are minor, and I gave it 2 stars, thats just below 'good' really. also, @PlanesOfOld you can have an opinion to, thats what voting is for, you can give it 5 stars, but as I think its just not in my opinion as good as its said to be... Anyway, you can give any rating on a plane, or they'd not allow you to give below 3 stars...Its rude if you give it a harsh rating without and justification or reasons.
So switch weight forwards then. Well thanks. @karlosdarkness
Actually kind of cute.
Why frown apon reasonable criticm and opinions? @eric314
@eric314 on google images, the wings DO look bigger, it may be the lack of a curve on the end like on the real fairly that causes them to look smaller. I admit not noticing it saying new era correct paint BUT after checking the new era paint on google images, it still appears a bit over dramatic in the colour difference. He could have made the colours blend more if he did panelled wings.
I'm not as much of a fan of the crazy painting pattern and the wings look, TOO small compared to the body
Cool plane, I quickly wanted your opinion on my latest plane, the ecobine. It's a fuel efficiency maniac!
Hey guys, a challenge I give out to all of you, make an EVEN MORE fuel efficient plane than this one, it'll be hard. It must be able to take off on its own, and be able to land.
VTOL it?
Looks very cool, good attention to detail.
Hard challenge. Rotators and counterbalances would be needed.
Pointless, quite lame.
Nice plane, I liked your Cessna as well, I'd quite appreciate your opinion on my Cessna T303 crusader.
Shouldn't be hard, I'll try to go for detail I think
Thanks hypnotoad! The large thing on the front is the balancing mechanism, stranglehold physics makes weight naturally fall backwards.