To all whom still look at this page, the B-24 D is being worked on, and is now 1/10 done it'll most likely take me a month to work on it since we're moving and all, but I'll try to finish it in a couple weeks.
@orbitaldrop I like a bit more realism to my planes, in fact, some are planes I hope to be able to make possibly, so realism is what I stick with... Plus I already knew that.
@Jacobdaniel Well, the fighter would need to be able to EASILY out run the bombers so that they can get ahead in mass, so I guess I'll build the bomber now.
@Jacobdaniel I removed 4 parts, I will post it in a little bit, also, I am doing a Bomber/Escort Fighter co-op, one person makes a Prop Bomber, the other makes a Prop Fighter to escort it, max part 250 Fighter, 350 Bomber, but most likely won't reach the limits, lol.
@Jacobdaniel https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/LebB3o/WS-16A jack of all trades master of none. Gute Nacht, it's now 00:53 here, I SHOULD get some sleep...
@Jacobdaniel I think it's best to use the 103 part count WS-16A it's a good fighter, and deals great damage, lol, I already posted it, but for this challenge I shall link you to it.
Without making an abomination of a plane, I can't make a good enough fighter to take EVERYONE out, I have a plane ready but the parts count is too high...…….. I use a lot of turn to my advantage along with good fire power...
@WOLFPACK123 I am planning on doing a co-op with anyone for now, someone in the co-op makes a bomber, the other makes a fighter that's in the bomber escort group, but prop only, anyone can do it with me, lol.(also I know, "that's what she said")
@Jacobdaniel Well, I will use the late variants, like the WS-262H-17 that's a real speedy, durable, just all around a good fighter, it's body is slightly altered from the earlier variants, for more speed, and durability, lol, I better go do my thing.
@Jacobdaniel Let me know when the next one is up, I have a plane to make for it, but no lock on missiles, that's like cheating, but the WS-262C-1 can counter lock on. lol
@pilotred233 It'll be a long time though, I can't afford a new PC and we have to move, by the end of the month..... So getting a better PC and a mic, are low priorities, as of now, I have to go it's 0131 here right now, 1:31 AM.
@pilotred233 lol, when I get a better pc and all that, I'll get my channel up, and that will be one of my first videos, I have a lot to do, jeez, TTYL, : )
@pilotred233 Well, it can compete with my WS-16A which is meant for HABI(High Altitude Bomber-Interceptor) missions. The WS-16B is much faster, sturdier, and has an extra two 37mm HF cannons. lol
Actually looks okay, and I bet it works well, my planes aren't for looks or functionality, they're a mix of both, :) I tend to make things look like they suck, but looks good, and make them surprise the enemy too, >:) but I see. You make it sound as if this plane looks bad but works well, but it looks good and works well. I made one for this challenge too, it looks weak, but, it, works, decently, >:D
Oh, a WWII Battle of Britain pack, thanks for letting me know, @Colonel1J2R3Wolf I now have ideas, but I don't design planes, m, does, and m is off, but won't tell me why...
LOL The P-26 PeaShooter.
To all whom still look at this page, the B-24 D is being worked on, and is now 1/10 done it'll most likely take me a month to work on it since we're moving and all, but I'll try to finish it in a couple weeks.
@orbitaldrop I like a bit more realism to my planes, in fact, some are planes I hope to be able to make possibly, so realism is what I stick with... Plus I already knew that.
@Jacobdaniel Yes.
@CALVIN232 Thanks.
@Jacobdaniel I sent one link, the other one is a successor
@orbitaldrop I don't do missiles, or I do them very rarely, I hate missiles...
@Jacobdaniel Well, the fighter would need to be able to EASILY out run the bombers so that they can get ahead in mass, so I guess I'll build the bomber now.
@Jacobdaniel Yeah it's a co-op, one of us makes a fighter the other makes a bomber, which one do you want to do?
@Jacobdaniel I removed 4 parts, I will post it in a little bit, also, I am doing a Bomber/Escort Fighter co-op, one person makes a Prop Bomber, the other makes a Prop Fighter to escort it, max part 250 Fighter, 350 Bomber, but most likely won't reach the limits, lol.
@Jacobdaniel It's three parts, lol, I'll do a bit of work on it to make it fit in the challenge.
@Jacobdaniel https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/LebB3o/WS-16A jack of all trades master of none. Gute Nacht, it's now 00:53 here, I SHOULD get some sleep...
@Jacobdaniel I think it's best to use the 103 part count WS-16A it's a good fighter, and deals great damage, lol, I already posted it, but for this challenge I shall link you to it.
Without making an abomination of a plane, I can't make a good enough fighter to take EVERYONE out, I have a plane ready but the parts count is too high...…….. I use a lot of turn to my advantage along with good fire power...
@Jacobdaniel please tell me that there will be no missiles in the normal prop battles, I don't want to have to make a large conversion....
@WOLFPACK123 I am planning on doing a co-op with anyone for now, someone in the co-op makes a bomber, the other makes a fighter that's in the bomber escort group, but prop only, anyone can do it with me, lol.(also I know, "that's what she said")
Good job, I can make a bomber escort fighter if you make a bomber for it to escort, or vise versa, let me know, :)
It might not be able to compete with the WS-17A-1, but I bet it'll do well against some opponents. :)
Good job.
@WOLFPACK123 Well then, Gute Nacht.
@WOLFPACK123 Well, then, what is the carrying capacity? Or do you mean a LAV?
Armored Personnel Carrier?
@WOLFPACK123 Okay, but I have a radial plane body ready if you need one.
@WOLFPACK123 Yeah.
@WOLFPACK123 No problem.
If you ever need help on an aircraft, if I'm not busy, I will work on it right away, :)
Project Code name: Bot Finder
@doge No problem! :)
@doge , I think this requires specialty.
Gut gemacht!
@Jacobdaniel Well, I will use the late variants, like the WS-262H-17 that's a real speedy, durable, just all around a good fighter, it's body is slightly altered from the earlier variants, for more speed, and durability, lol, I better go do my thing.
@Jacobdaniel Let me know when the next one is up, I have a plane to make for it, but no lock on missiles, that's like cheating, but the WS-262C-1 can counter lock on. lol
@Jacobdaniel please do, I enter with fighter plane challenges, I can make the WS-262A-1 if jets are allowed, if not the WS-35A-1 would do fine. :)
My WS-3A-1 would do well in this, but it's not very sturdy, too bad I came late.
@pilotred233 It'll be a long time though, I can't afford a new PC and we have to move, by the end of the month..... So getting a better PC and a mic, are low priorities, as of now, I have to go it's 0131 here right now, 1:31 AM.
@pilotred233 lol, when I get a better pc and all that, I'll get my channel up, and that will be one of my first videos, I have a lot to do, jeez, TTYL, : )
Good job, I can test bombers out in here now.
@ProcessedPlAnEs I have it, flaps also added, AG 8, and VTOL.
@pilotred233 lol, do you play BR? (Brick Rigs)
@pilotred233 Okay, I was letting you know, also because, I like to help people out.
I don't know..... But we need more of 'em...
+2What have you created...?!
I guess no one really likes this plane...?
Hmmm, your aircraft likes to stall a lot, if it turns too sharply, it stalls out and goes into a flat spin, until death....
@pilotred233 Well, it can compete with my WS-16A which is meant for HABI(High Altitude Bomber-Interceptor) missions. The WS-16B is much faster, sturdier, and has an extra two 37mm HF cannons. lol
Actually looks okay, and I bet it works well, my planes aren't for looks or functionality, they're a mix of both, :) I tend to make things look like they suck, but looks good, and make them surprise the enemy too, >:) but I see. You make it sound as if this plane looks bad but works well, but it looks good and works well. I made one for this challenge too, it looks weak, but, it, works, decently, >:D
Oh, a WWII Battle of Britain pack, thanks for letting me know, @Colonel1J2R3Wolf I now have ideas, but I don't design planes, m, does, and m is off, but won't tell me why...
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/LebB3o/WS-16A all specs are located here.
@Flameslinger That's how M makes them, LOL.
@Flameslinger I like your plane, may the best fighter win. :)
+1