@destroyerP Never heard of it.. "Aesthetics"
Not everyone comes out of the US or UK.
Also i did not know you accepted OVER-doing XML. xd
Can i make another version?
@destroyerP It's an air superiority vehicle not a SAM emplacement...
Is it fair to Judge on that?
Tell me what is wrong....
Also.. How can you properly detail a plane without fuselage & what on earth are Aesthetics?!
There are some problems such as: The Ailerons should be on the tips of the wing,
The elevator part was not swiped and but straight, so where the main wing-tips..
Also the cockpit should be more upfront...
AND the engine looks weird, The landing gear.. is a bit off i'd say.
The elevators are also the full surface of the craft and not
.__
| |-------|
But more
.__
|-----------|..
All out of my memory...
But it's still pretty cool for a new-er user
Well done lad!
MEERKAT is right ... Upscaled engines or Downscaled easily fail at: the scale of the props, attaching, and also hitboxes can freak out.
@IAmMyBoss i can do it right now..
AC-130 still?
@Victor039 Turned out to be 120 parts... that was noticed too late :3
Could not UN-Predecessor it.
@Victor039 thx
@Texasfam04 yup
When you have 68 downloads and 5 upvotes 😤-😧-😒-😞-😏-😌-😊-😁-😃-😂😂😂😂
How did this happen XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
@destroyerP oki
@Texasfam04 thx alot!
Sorry accidentally reply'd to myself..
@ProKillaV12
@Texasfam04 @SuperSix True
look on side bluepriny they are
@MakeshiftPlanes i think that is shadowing..
@MakeshiftPlanes where? i have no idea what you mean... i think they are,,,
@ProKillaV12 wut?
THX for the upvote guys :D
@Franticmatty
Victors it was supposed to be for the 75 part challenge but got too much parts my actual thing will come soon sorry for the trouble..
3 for dropping all bombs at once and 4 for dropping the rocket pods..
@destroyerP Never heard of it.. "Aesthetics"
Not everyone comes out of the US or UK.
Also i did not know you accepted OVER-doing XML. xd
Can i make another version?
@SpiritusRaptor nah, just wanted to know.
@destroyerP It's an air superiority vehicle not a SAM emplacement...
Is it fair to Judge on that?
Tell me what is wrong....
Also.. How can you properly detail a plane without fuselage & what on earth are Aesthetics?!
@GlargiBoo No worries man
@SpiritusRaptor darn...
My entry.
@destroyerP
There are some problems such as: The Ailerons should be on the tips of the wing,
The elevator part was not swiped and but straight, so where the main wing-tips..
Also the cockpit should be more upfront...
AND the engine looks weird, The landing gear.. is a bit off i'd say.
The elevators are also the full surface of the craft and not
.__
| |-------|
But more
.__
|-----------|..
All out of my memory...
But it's still pretty cool for a new-er user
Well done lad!
I see...
@EternalDarkness True
Nice one however ^^
No copy-cats yet?
(i am suprised)
@SpiritusRaptor with AG's?
@SpiritusRaptor XDDDDD.
Rip!!!
Also, how the heck did you get different vehicles in your cinematics?!
@Razor3278 Allright : )
Wait...
USAF?
You ment NASA right?
The shadow on Picture one looks like an Ultra-Me-262
@Texasfam04 Have you seen the X-4 i posted?
You did not respond...
(i @'ed) you too!
@Sebastiantem Wut?
What happend?
WHY ARE YOU 225 IF YOU BUILD TIS GOOD?!
@Texasfam04 Thx buddy
;D
@Texasfam04 and also minimized detail so i can work on bigger stuff comming soon! ^^
@Potkuri I think...
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@Texasfam04 Awesome plane man!
Looks 5/5
Dat for sure (ill get in serious stuff later XD)
Enterededed :3
Well...
I do know the F5-E Tiger II
And you dont submit false stuff..
I dont even have to check out the wiki :3
YOU ARE ENTERED!!
@Texasfam04 Tommorow i should wrap the darn thing up...
9 P.M ...
Codename Bedtime :3