@11qazxc but if you don't measure the sides and just measure the height from the base to the vertex, that will be equivalent to the length of the sides
very nice, but you used the wrong engines. the id is supposed to be 1, not 2. I tested it with 1 id engines and it went 188mph gs, and that weighted is 169.2mph. handling is great, 9/10 but if i were you, i would make another revision and get this to fly at higher speeds.
7/10 handling, 365.4 weighted gs. I said in the challenge description that you must change all engine scales back to 1, because the original ones are .5. I tested with scales of 1, and it is the 2nd fastest plane of the bunch. Very very nice job.
@11qazxc glitches as in bugs that make you obtain more speed of less drag. GS is measured by how fast your plane can fly until it stops speeding up. weighted gs = .9 x weighted gs, only if you have a twin aircraft. by no xml, i mean no using any kind of multipliers or scales that may be used to decrease weight, drag, or increase speed in any way.
max speed 251mph, and handling 5/10. I scaled the engines back to the normal drag and mass specs, I said to do that in the rules. anyway, good job. I will allow you to revamp yours because you didnt know.
I am an idiot. I set the engine drag and mass scale to 0.5 instead of 1. AHHH. I tested this after I changed it back to normal. This resulted in 3/10 handling, which is not great. The speed it though. I got it to go up to 397 mph, which makes it the fastest as of the moment. you got 72 points out of 100.
@Kangy ah. well. um. .............. i have no wind going, so what difference will it make? i am also testing them all at around the same altitude, so that wont really make a difference right?
you modded the engine to have half of the drag and weight. this is against the rules, so i just made it normal. I got it up to 257mph. it handles AMAZING. 9/10. it is a little slower than your last, but is still faster than the others at the time i am saying this. tell me if you want to keep the other one as your entry, this one, or if you want to fix this one.
@Mattyeboy a mobile divorce
+2attention to detail on this is purely incredible
+3beautiful.
this is high res in terms of pixel art. i love it
+2@trios21 idk, just make what feels comfortable. you dont need su27 handling, preferably not, but just smooth and responsive motions
@trios21 i think that your plane did not have poor handling, but anyway, really fast roll, almost no pitch, or any combination of those
@SpartanDelta1 your welcome
@11qazxc but if you don't measure the sides and just measure the height from the base to the vertex, that will be equivalent to the length of the sides
Among us
Thanks @Suubk27 glad to see you again!
+1weighted max speed is 800.1 mph
max speed 889mph, jesus christ. handling 9/10. that is what i call 1st place.
very nice, but you used the wrong engines. the id is supposed to be 1, not 2. I tested it with 1 id engines and it went 188mph gs, and that weighted is 169.2mph. handling is great, 9/10 but if i were you, i would make another revision and get this to fly at higher speeds.
+17/10 handling, 365.4 weighted gs. I said in the challenge description that you must change all engine scales back to 1, because the original ones are .5. I tested with scales of 1, and it is the 2nd fastest plane of the bunch. Very very nice job.
@trios21 yes
@trios21 which version do you want to be representative?
quadruple a10 coming near you..
@trios21 you can make as many as you want, but only one will be represented in the scores
@11qazxc glitches as in bugs that make you obtain more speed of less drag. GS is measured by how fast your plane can fly until it stops speeding up. weighted gs = .9 x weighted gs, only if you have a twin aircraft. by no xml, i mean no using any kind of multipliers or scales that may be used to decrease weight, drag, or increase speed in any way.
@GuyFolk
@ZHUAREVONI
@trios21
@Blockmanufacturer0228
@Exefune
@Dpdfuzz
@Ultimatepretzel9
@Shootlegger
@ACBrazil
Challenge scores here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bDiBA_Al0jMvSmdsZgMc-ZmtyOpqQPUPVee8YZLb1Oo/edit?usp=sharing
max speed 281mph gs handling 7/10
nice job
@trios21 you can use whatever cockpit you want and you can size scale it
@Ruskiwaffle1991 we need that
@LieutenantSOT me
+1you should still stack the engines to secure 1st place
@ZHUAREVONI ohhhhhh
you should stack the engines
your old one is actually way faster - 325nmph gs
ah yes this is what i thought i would see more of
@ZHUAREVONI funny funny
+1max speed 251mph, and handling 5/10. I scaled the engines back to the normal drag and mass specs, I said to do that in the rules. anyway, good job. I will allow you to revamp yours because you didnt know.
more engines would be nice
@GuyFolk you can stack engines if you want im not gonna stop you
@GuyFolk ah i see. i dont feel like DQing a bunch of people so im just gonna say its fine
@GuyFolk turning off collisions is not scaling
@GuyFolk yeah
I am an idiot. I set the engine drag and mass scale to 0.5 instead of 1. AHHH. I tested this after I changed it back to normal. This resulted in 3/10 handling, which is not great. The speed it though. I got it to go up to 397 mph, which makes it the fastest as of the moment. you got 72 points out of 100.
+1Make sure you change the scales of the engines to 1
@GuyFolk thanks very much. i am an idiot
@Coolman1000 sorry again..
@Shootlegger his was 96 out of 100, which is 1st place as of now
same thing for this. I noticed some size scaling, which again im very sorry.
sorry to disappoint you but in the rules it said no scaling of any kind. this includes size and drag points. im sorry bro :( nice plane though
@Kangy ok thats fine
@Kangy ................!@!#$@#$#!
+1@Kangy ah. well. um. .............. i have no wind going, so what difference will it make? i am also testing them all at around the same altitude, so that wont really make a difference right?
@ZHUAREVONI alright great job though yours is beautiful. again, i changed it to normal for testing and it got an insane score
btw it will have MANY more points than the last because it handles way better (96/100 which is OUTSTANDING)
you modded the engine to have half of the drag and weight. this is against the rules, so i just made it normal. I got it up to 257mph. it handles AMAZING. 9/10. it is a little slower than your last, but is still faster than the others at the time i am saying this. tell me if you want to keep the other one as your entry, this one, or if you want to fix this one.
@ZHUAREVONI ok