@Pakdaaircraftindustries pffft no, this is actually pretty good. don't worry about the inaccuracy I wanted the glide kit with the wings because it looked funny and seen it in WarThunder. anyways thanks again for doing my request, I shall do one request from you as well whenever you feel like it :)
@V thanks I'm using AI to code to try and understand funky trees since I see it as a pretty complex thing so AI somewhat helped but nothing can truly replace the human mind. anyways thanks for helping 🙂
you forgot to tag me, anyways I have a question on the second round.. how many submissions will you accept? 1 or 2 like usual, and if so can it be a remake of a previous aircraft? (restarting from scratch to optimize the airframe and add more features in general)
also the Su-34 is very nice, can it carry the FAB-1500 which was modified to be a glide bomb?
also can you make a FAB-1500 glide bomb? I wanna see something like that
@Pakdaaircraftindustries and engine right? merkava I think has this configuration with turret behind and engine in front for survivability, at the costs that driver gets slightly worse visibility.
also I assume the tungsten plate is not too heavy right? it's still an IFV that should be light, if it's too heavy then it's either just a wheeled light tank or tank destroyer
@Pakdaaircraftindustries looks real nice and crisp, looks a bit front heavy though.
also can you PLEASE allow me to post just one submission for the 2nd round with custom wings🙏🙏🙏🙏. please dawg. custom wings that are low part is literally the life blood of my account
@Pakdaaircraftindustries lol, also when is the second round starting? it's itching me but I can't post because I only have something for the second round
@Pakdaaircraftindustries hmm, 'if' there were a second round from the builds what happens? another rating of the builds presented or new builds from the people that got in the second round
@Pakdaaircraftindustries the looks is understandable, can't have all at maximum. if you want something elsse to get a better rating score you'd have to make compromises
@Pakdaaircraftindustries also sometimes I use Gemini AI for funky trees coding because I myself can't understand it to some degree.
I train it first, sometimes it makes up an input which you need to correct it and sometimes things that doesn't even look like funky trees, and it can't make overly complex codes. even so I still use Gemini for some of the funky trees I use.
I'm not exactly sure if this'll work or not, I haven't tested it yet and it's not mine
((SelectWeapon = Weapon 1) ? FireWeapons : 0)
the code belongs to the input on the detacher. "weapon 1" can be named with the weapon you have or want like cleaver or set a custom name on a missile, then just place a delay from the detacher itself. also it's only for one detacher if you have multiple I think it'll start/activate after all of the selected weapon has been fired.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries is there still some negotiation room for me to squeeze in? what if you allow fusalage wings but you need to deduct 0.2 - 0.5 in all categories of the rating system?
@Pakdaaircraftindustries, nevermind actually I'll just post it normally since you clearly stated it
"It can't have a VR cockpit or custom fuselage wings! Neither it can have Custom weapons (you can change the name and parameters of the default weapons)"
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I'm actually thinking of posting another one since it's part of the rules. also thanks for the good rating, I hope I can still exploit thee loopholes again ;)
@Kav very near to posting, it still needs tweaks and fixes. also do you know how to solve the vibration? I've already set it past the maximum and went straight to 5 instead of 2.5 yet it still vibrates..
@SuperSuperTheSylph thanks but it's already past 100 parts and it's still not true super maneuverability because if it were a true cobra the canards would be facing the front, it's still got some tweakin to do. thanks :)
@DasAbhinab yes, I am on it. but I underestimated the little guy because it has the most complex wing shape I've ever encountered. it's very deceiving at a glance
@Kav hmmm, I did build a fictional 'variant' of it. but messed up the acceleration=top speed thingy which I can't fix because everytime I get a good acceleration or top speed it's at that point that you don't lose too much speed when pitching hard
@Pakdaaircraftindustries pffft no, this is actually pretty good. don't worry about the inaccuracy I wanted the glide kit with the wings because it looked funny and seen it in WarThunder. anyways thanks again for doing my request, I shall do one request from you as well whenever you feel like it :)
@Pakdaaircraftindustries never got notified, scratch that I think FAB-3000 UMPK would be fitting
@V thanks I'm using AI to code to try and understand funky trees since I see it as a pretty complex thing so AI somewhat helped but nothing can truly replace the human mind. anyways thanks for helping 🙂
@Pakdaaircraftindustries thanks :)
you forgot to tag me, anyways I have a question on the second round.. how many submissions will you accept? 1 or 2 like usual, and if so can it be a remake of a previous aircraft? (restarting from scratch to optimize the airframe and add more features in general)
also the Su-34 is very nice, can it carry the FAB-1500 which was modified to be a glide bomb?
also can you make a FAB-1500 glide bomb? I wanna see something like that
@Pakdaaircraftindustries imagine a 75mm flak cannon with air burst munition..
@Pakdaaircraftindustries and engine right? merkava I think has this configuration with turret behind and engine in front for survivability, at the costs that driver gets slightly worse visibility.
also I assume the tungsten plate is not too heavy right? it's still an IFV that should be light, if it's too heavy then it's either just a wheeled light tank or tank destroyer
@Pakdaaircraftindustries hooray
@Pakdaaircraftindustries looks real nice and crisp, looks a bit front heavy though.
also can you PLEASE allow me to post just one submission for the 2nd round with custom wings🙏🙏🙏🙏. please dawg. custom wings that are low part is literally the life blood of my account
+1@Pakdaaircraftindustries okay, I'm very excited
@Pakdaaircraftindustries does it have the same rules?
+1@Pakdaaircraftindustries lol, also when is the second round starting? it's itching me but I can't post because I only have something for the second round
@Pakdaaircraftindustries hehe
very niçe indeed also I saw what you did there with the nozzle insides try my technique with my mig-29, it's just a simple engine aesthetic
+1@Pakdaaircraftindustries hmm, 'if' there were a second round from the builds what happens? another rating of the builds presented or new builds from the people that got in the second round
@SilverStar indeed, I try very hard to not use gyro but it degrades controllability a ton because I am not used to making helicopters.
@ComradeBazookaBall what was it like? I don't play on PC
+1@Pakdaaircraftindustries
I'm doing a similar project but I got stopped by a problem, can you help me make it fly?
+1@Pakdaaircraftindustries tag me in future creations
now just give it a scattering effect by changing the strength of detacher and customizing the weight of the paratrooper
+1@Pakdaaircraftindustries the looks is understandable, can't have all at maximum. if you want something elsse to get a better rating score you'd have to make compromises
@Pakdaaircraftindustries thanks, also I'm not disqualified right? those are wing thickeners/roots where the swing wing and bays hide not decorative.
rating?
@Pakdaaircraftindustries it can do research on it if you command it to learn basic funky trees
@Pakdaaircraftindustries np :)
@Pakdaaircraftindustries also sometimes I use Gemini AI for funky trees coding because I myself can't understand it to some degree.
I train it first, sometimes it makes up an input which you need to correct it and sometimes things that doesn't even look like funky trees, and it can't make overly complex codes. even so I still use Gemini for some of the funky trees I use.
@Pakdaaircraftindustries hmm..
I'm not exactly sure if this'll work or not, I haven't tested it yet and it's not mine
((SelectWeapon = Weapon 1) ? FireWeapons : 0)
the code belongs to the input on the detacher. "weapon 1" can be named with the weapon you have or want like cleaver or set a custom name on a missile, then just place a delay from the detacher itself. also it's only for one detacher if you have multiple I think it'll start/activate after all of the selected weapon has been fired.
+1@Pakdaaircraftindustries sure go ahead
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I'm gonna post now~
also no cockpit and fusalage wings this time
@Pakdaaircraftindustries understandable. I'll chill for a while then since the contest is still early
@Pakdaaircraftindustries is there still some negotiation room for me to squeeze in? what if you allow fusalage wings but you need to deduct 0.2 - 0.5 in all categories of the rating system?
@Pakdaaircraftindustries, nevermind actually I'll just post it normally since you clearly stated it
"It can't have a VR cockpit or custom fuselage wings! Neither it can have Custom weapons (you can change the name and parameters of the default weapons)"
@Pakdaaircraftindustries I'm actually thinking of posting another one since it's part of the rules. also thanks for the good rating, I hope I can still exploit thee loopholes again ;)
Can I participate? what if I lessen the small details and replace it with fuselage wings to make it semi realistic
@DasAbhinab I actually have a Blackhawk just not the seahawk with the landing gear and grey finish
@Kav Sure I can tag you and no worries I'll probably figure it out. I'll it post tomorrow
+1@Kav very near to posting, it still needs tweaks and fixes. also do you know how to solve the vibration? I've already set it past the maximum and went straight to 5 instead of 2.5 yet it still vibrates..
+1@Kav thanks
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph thanks but it's already past 100 parts and it's still not true super maneuverability because if it were a true cobra the canards would be facing the front, it's still got some tweakin to do. thanks :)
+1@Andyj15 because I don't have the time or capabilities to arm an entire warship, I intend to use this as target practice or props
tag me next time too
+1@ChaseRacliot I do have a Mig-21 but it's the one used for the Tu-144 wing tests
+1@DasAbhinab Tejas Mk-1 is postponed for now since the airframe is not at the optimal performance, I'll be delaying Tejas for other projects
+1@LTHank the windows are giving me nightmares because I am not accustomed to those types of windows
@MobileBuilder21 I think these will do
@Boeing727200F nuclear pipe bomb
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph I'll try after I finish my current one
+1@DasAbhinab ohh I never touched blender before. for the SP controls.. it'll probably be fine
@DasAbhinab yes, I am on it. but I underestimated the little guy because it has the most complex wing shape I've ever encountered. it's very deceiving at a glance
+1@Kav hmmm, I did build a fictional 'variant' of it. but messed up the acceleration=top speed thingy which I can't fix because everytime I get a good acceleration or top speed it's at that point that you don't lose too much speed when pitching hard
+1