@DasAbhinab not really, it's actually just an Su-30SM with changed colors but don't plan on publishing yet it since it's not 'simple' enough for me. plus I'm working on other stuff like things from beriev
Here ya go, it's not the best nor the most detailed plus no cockpit but I only do low part builds like this. I apologize if this isn't to your liking.. anyways happy flying ;)
@JustinSiregar I'll try it. I never do much requests but since it's been forever since I uploaded I'll do it. (Expect it in 5 days or more because of schedules)
I have a question, why are the guns on the top along side the bridge and other components?
It makes it top heavy and could flip over, maybe try making an airship with one front turret with the mechanics similar to how the bottom ball gunner on the B-29 so it can point down a bit, up a bit, and on the sides a bit. Also place the engines, props and other stuff on the other end to 'stabilize' the weight of the turret, the bridge should be under and just a few meters behind the main cannon from the airship to get greater visual cover and a smaller secondary bridge on the top for top view, the AA would be on the sides along with 2-4 secondary cannons 2 on each side. Worth noting that whatever gas is lifting inside it probably not gonna lift it. :)
@DasAbhinab I'll try, but it's probably gonna take me 5-8 days since I'm busy
+1@DasAbhinab what variant?
@DasAbhinab not really, it's actually just an Su-30SM with changed colors but don't plan on publishing yet it since it's not 'simple' enough for me. plus I'm working on other stuff like things from beriev
+1@Ihateuglyplanedesign, I have improved since last year
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore yep, except the pilots get a slightly better view because of the windows being ever so slightly taller..
@SuperSuperTheSylph hahaha lol, literally 😂
+1@DasAbhinab I did not know that.... I'm so sorry, my fault.
+1@DasAbhinab this one, Antonov airport. I use it for eastern Europe builds and pictures
+1@DasAbhinab, here is the Su-25. I couldn't make it fully stabilized, it wobbles a bit..
+1@DasAbhinab okay, I'll try to make it
+1@DasAbhinab also what Su-25? the one with the bigger cockpit that is colored blue?
@DasAbhinab ohh sure I'll try :)
@DasAbhinab I'll try, expect it in 4 days. also what's fully stabilized mean??
@SuperSuperTheSylph aww dammit.. maybe next time for the F-117 nighthawk, I've got a new building technique for the panels I want to try
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph, are PEA and Low part builds under 100 parts? if so I'm setting a new rule for myself to not exceed 100 parts
+1Also when you are in the cockpit cam, THERES A PERSON
+1can I use 'PEA' in my title for a project? it's bellow 100 parts
@Indo666 yeah, I didn't really do the code, I just copied it from a forum post after autoaim turrets. I'm not that good in that area
@MomoDesigns ah.. the nostalgia is coming back
@CessnaIsCool can I post another one?
Edit: nevermind I scrapped it because loss of interest
@LunarEclipseSP thanks, appreciated :))
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph same, I last played modern warships about 4 months ago this is a fun ship for me since it's just ramming others 😅
+1@LunarEclipseSP basically yeah, but mainly used for covert operations because it only supports 3-4 ka-27 helicopters
+1@CessnaIsCool also can I submit more than 1 entry? If so I can publish another creation I made a long time ago which is collecting dust
@MonsNotTheMonster 💯💯
+1@CessnaIsCool thanks, I appreciate the support :)
Helicopters sold separately
Ballasts don't exists, it's a myth
+4Damn, this is good 🙂
@ShinyGemsBro lol that's a better example 😂
@SuperSuperTheSylph dude fr you just spotlight everything I do, thanks :)
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph you don't have to spotlight every thing I post though.. thanks again ;)
+1Nevermind, I found the code.
smooth(FireGuns,1.5)
+1Works for me, but thanks for sharing your knowledge:)
@MobileBuilder21 thanks, a fan of yours ;)
@MobileBuilder21 thanks:)
@dekanii ah.. that's a bit disappointing, so a gyroscope makes the aircraft not spawn. Fine for me since I make air traffic zero and spawn manually
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph ;) I will
+1@LunarEclipseSP lol
+1@TitanVector yes the maneuverability is good but roll rate is a bit sluggish to my liking though.. enjoy :)
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph thanks
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore globe master is already awesome looking by itself :)
+1@CaptainNoble this was the inspiration which is arguably more weird
@JustinSiregar
Here ya go, it's not the best nor the most detailed plus no cockpit but I only do low part builds like this. I apologize if this isn't to your liking.. anyways happy flying ;)
+1@JustinSiregar I'll try it. I never do much requests but since it's been forever since I uploaded I'll do it. (Expect it in 5 days or more because of schedules)
+1@Object775blyat ya sure
+1I have a question, why are the guns on the top along side the bridge and other components?
It makes it top heavy and could flip over, maybe try making an airship with one front turret with the mechanics similar to how the bottom ball gunner on the B-29 so it can point down a bit, up a bit, and on the sides a bit. Also place the engines, props and other stuff on the other end to 'stabilize' the weight of the turret, the bridge should be under and just a few meters behind the main cannon from the airship to get greater visual cover and a smaller secondary bridge on the top for top view, the AA would be on the sides along with 2-4 secondary cannons 2 on each side. Worth noting that whatever gas is lifting inside it probably not gonna lift it. :)
Anyways here's my upvote, it's very nice
@BuildModifier thanks, but there are much much much more realistic both physically and function.. mine is more for AI control, simple and easy to fly
@Luchibat6 yeah, I'm somewhat responsible for the wonky housing because I just used an intake and connected it to the fuselage, but thanks again :)
@Luchibat6 no worries, it's fine. Also the TVC you implemented is pretty good, thanks bruv ;)
@SuperSuperTheSylph thanks, it's my first 'successful' main rotor and tail rotor helicopter :)
+1@Convex it's perfect on other eyes, from the creators point of view it's only flaws.. thanks :))