25.5k Mustang51 Comments

  • Russian armored vehicle typ-??? 2.6 years ago

    Ah nice! Some target practice

    +2
  • KE-48A Schwalbe 2.6 years ago

    @KUBI my god this is fantastic! Honestly one of the coolest looking realistic fictional aircraft I’ve seen on SP

    +1
  • Northrop F-5 Tiger 2.6 years ago

    @KUBI hey friend! Of course I remember you! I’d be glad to check out your page. I’ve been on the SP website a lot more recently but I never stopped building. No promises but I’ll try to stay active again :)

    +1
  • Flag of canada 2.6 years ago

    Poor Canadians

    +1
  • a bullet chambered in .45 acp (with barrel, flies) 2.6 years ago

    “I carry a .45 Cus they don’t make a .46” @ReinMcDeer

    +7
  • A-7 Corsair 2.6 years ago

    @Hedero One of the best comments I’ve ever seen 😂

  • Northrop F-5 Tiger 2.6 years ago

    This plane on the surface looks good but some things could definitely be improved. The dimensions of the plane are quite a bit off but proportionally it’s still good. However, the flight characteristics need some work. The engines are waaaay too powerful for a plane which can’t hit mach 2 in real life and the take off length is virtually nothing. If you reduce the drag (I’m not sure where you have over 3000 points of drag from actually), and give it a realistic thrust with an increase around 95% for the afterburner, it will fly way more realistically. I also love the detailing you did on this aircraft. Makes it look fantastic, especially with this engines!

    +2
  • Mig-15bis / Lim-2 2.7 years ago

    I absolutely love this build! The control stiffening speed was a fantastic addition. The one thing that could be better is a more realistic acceleration rate. Reducing engine power and drag (on parts other than the wheels) would definitely help with that. To maintain a realistic loss of airspeed during certain aircraft manoeuvres, you can make air breaks which open when pitch is input. Nevertheless I love this build!

    +2
  • Funky trees help (never exceed speed) 2.7 years ago

    @Kangy haha no one said it. I just feel that way myself unfortunately. I’ll post a couple and tag you. I’ll also add you on discord 👌🏼

    +1
  • Fuel Consumption Rates? 2.7 years ago

    @spefyjerbf okay thanks!

    +1
  • Mirage F-1 with Fly by Wire system 2.7 years ago

    @Posadas I completely understand what you mean. I started playing this game in 2013 or 2014 and it took me forever to get the hang of it too. If you want any tips or tricks on how to make planes that look good perform realistically as well feel free to ask! I don’t upload anymore but I’m constantly making new aircraft and they fly more realistically every time hahaha

  • F/A-18 Super Hornet Block III 2.7 years ago

    Apart from the copy pasted hud, I’m not sure there were many improvements lol

  • Custome landing gear-2 2.7 years ago

    Ah yes, now my builds can be in the thousands of parts

    +3
  • [25 parts] SU-25 2.7 years ago

    This is a perfect AI aircraft!

    +3
  • Mirage F-1 with Fly by Wire system 2.7 years ago

    This plane looks really cool! Huge jump from what you were making only a few days ago. Did you get any help on it or was it all you? Also while it looks good it’s flight characteristics are “interesting”. I suggest trying to make it fly more like the real thing. Then you’ll have a fantastic build!

  • Funky trees help (never exceed speed) 2.7 years ago

    @lxnylx hey buddy! Sorry for my super late reply but I remember you!

  • Funky trees help (never exceed speed) 2.7 years ago

    @CarrotSlicingCompanyCat @Kangy hey y’all. I’m still playing SimplePlanes but I don’t really upload anymore. I felt that every time I uploaded I had to make the plane better than the one before and it started to take out some of the fun. I’ve made lots of cool and fun stuff though I can show you in unlisted posts if you’d like :)

  • Fuel Consumption Rates? 2.7 years ago

    I know this is old but do you know if fuel consumption goes up or down when you change the power multiplier on the engine?

    +1
  • Small Feature Wish List for v1.11 Update 2.8 years ago

    It would also be great to have rocket motors which would use separate fuel. Not as extensive as SR2 but a choice to have solid or liquid fuel would be great. This would be fantastic for making JATO like accessories and rockets in general.

    +6
  • Small Feature Wish List for v1.11 Update 2.8 years ago

    It would be great if you could choose which fuel tank to use first. This way drop tanks could actually be useful and dropped once they are empty

    +13
  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 2.8 years ago

    No one said it would have been hahaha @Gramgramofficial

  • T2J-1 Buckeye 3.1 years ago

    I think you alone got me to platinum. Thank you so much my friend!

    +1
  • Funky trees help (never exceed speed) 3.1 years ago

    @Default4 @TatsuTheOtaku thanks guys!

    +2
  • A-37B Dragonfly RVNAF 3.2 years ago

    This is a fun one to fly!

    +1
  • Columbiair FB-7 Lion Divebomber Interceptor 3.2 years ago

    Better late than never :)

  • B-20A Aerofortress 3.2 years ago

    @CommandPuppy2 lol I guess you don’t know how to fly then

    +1
  • F-84F Thunderstreak 3.2 years ago

    I love your taste in aircraft!

    +1
  • Saab 37 Viggen 3.2 years ago

    This is great! Awesome build

    +1
  • Funky trees help (never exceed speed) 3.2 years ago

    @SilverStar I keep losing track of which funkytrees guide to follow. Thanks for that!

  • Funky trees help (never exceed speed) 3.2 years ago

    @SilverStar I’ve been working with that so far. Is there also a way to make it activate based on g force?

  • N-900 Prometheus (Manual control to hit the target) 3.2 years ago

    Looks like someone needs SimpleRockets2 lol

    +2
  • RG-MiG-15 3.2 years ago

    Love me some MiG-15s that exceed mach 1 in a climb

  • Can you name them all? 3.2 years ago

    Thought it would be easier to talk here :) I’m working on a B&V P208.1 at the moment but I also have an almost complete F-84G and Supermarine Type 553. I’m gonna finish all and then I also have a challenge that I think people are going to enjoy

    +1
  • Bereznyak-Isayev BI 3.2 years ago

    @Kangy yup! That I am :)

    +1
  • Bereznyak-Isayev BI 3.2 years ago

    This is really cool!

    +1
  • Funky trees help (never exceed speed) 3.2 years ago

    @FeatherWing thanks for this! Maybe it’ll make it work

  • Hawker Siddeley Trident 3B 3.2 years ago

    @Tang0five I was actually looking at how you made them. I’ve been trying to make nice swept back wings for a while but I always end up going back to one large half circular front section with pointy flaps and ailerons at the back hahaha. Nice work though!

  • Hawker Siddeley Trident 3B 3.2 years ago

    Absolutely beautiful! Looks right and flies great too

    +1
  • Simple F-106A 3.2 years ago

    @EngineerOtaku I’ve been collecting for 15 years. HobbyMaster is definitely a good one but often very pricey compared to similar models from other brands like corgi and herpa. You got any questions about collecting just let me know :)

    +1
  • Simple F-106A 3.2 years ago

    HobbyMaster is one of my wallets biggest enemies

  • Volksian Heavy Industries HF-85IP Hellfire 3.2 years ago

    Nice! It’s like if the cavalier mustang somehow had a tolerance for infinite g force lol

    +1
  • SR & EE Sea Sparrow FGA.1 3.2 years ago

    @JuanNotAnAlt have we talked before?

  • phoebe - 3.2 years ago

    I saw a yacht that looked similar to this while on holiday is Croatia. It was owned by Joe Lewis I think and had a full sized tennis court inside.

  • SR & EE Sea Sparrow FGA.1 3.2 years ago

    @JuanNotAnAlt hey!

    +1
  • AN 225 3.2 years ago

    To remove it entirely, you have to add a new part connection between the tips of the wings to the end of the fuselage part you used to make the wings look better

  • German Corsair 3.2 years ago

    Just so confused

  • Republic XF-84H Thunderscreech 3.2 years ago

    Pretty good! It looks nice and you got it to be loud but the roll rate could really use an increase. The turn radius is also a bit too tight. Overall though I like it!

    +1
  • Manshu Ki-98 3.2 years ago

    Very nice! Flies well and looks pretty good too

    +1
  • HO-7 3.2 years ago

    Pretty cool build :)

  • HE-117 3.2 years ago

    Pretty nice!