This was poorly worded. Half its size =/= 2x its size. EDIT: Ex. if the pond was 32m^2 large, and the lilypad grew half its size (1.5x) from 1m^2 every day, the sequence would be 1, 1.5, 2.25, 3.375, etc, rendering the answer and its reasoning untrue. If it went up by a common ratio of 2, meaning it grew 2x its size daily, it would go: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, 32, making the day before the last having half its size. There is no answer because there are no numbers in the sequence that are halves of each other.
Very strange, each time I get one of the upvotes it tells me I have 2 notifications instead of 1. EDIT: Just realized you were referring to not getting a notification of the mention, same happened to me. @NovaTopaz
How about a rocket engine? Or maybe some sort of booster? And also greater ability to customize fuselage blocks (change length, width, and height of individual corners, allowing greater detail). Also, some effects of G-forces would be cool.
This is the HG III, and none were built. The HG II was of a much less radical design, looking much like the original 262, and as far as I know, only an HG I actually flew before the end of the war.
You could have done the prop cone yourself. For future reference, you can make any part fit where it normally can't just by rotating it four times. It will still appear red but in reality it will stay on, and the red will go away when you go to mirror it or after you play. Great work with the rest of the build though.
no @PlaneSmith
Ayy lmao
3
Both ratios lead to different numbers. @Dullwolf
Alright, now moving on to the math @Dullwolf
This was poorly worded. Half its size =/= 2x its size. EDIT: Ex. if the pond was 32m^2 large, and the lilypad grew half its size (1.5x) from 1m^2 every day, the sequence would be 1, 1.5, 2.25, 3.375, etc, rendering the answer and its reasoning untrue. If it went up by a common ratio of 2, meaning it grew 2x its size daily, it would go: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, 32, making the day before the last having half its size. There is no answer because there are no numbers in the sequence that are halves of each other.
99% sure it's a Bf 109...
Feet, inches, miles, etc @AeroEngineering
Interesting engine configuration and great flying. I love it!
You might need to make the vertical stabilizer bigger, or add some positive dihedral to the horizontal ones.
That challenge has ended...
Done!
@YoYoJ16
I like the idea. I'm in!
Makes sense @NovaTopaz
Didn't get that mention either @BigCat
Very strange, each time I get one of the upvotes it tells me I have 2 notifications instead of 1. EDIT: Just realized you were referring to not getting a notification of the mention, same happened to me. @NovaTopaz
Can I enter a plane I have already made, or does it have to be a new one? EDIT: Just reread it and saw the part about the bombs, never mind
WWII planes ftw
Thank you! Have some upvotes!
Hard to believe this was made on iOS!
Welcome to the club
How about a rocket engine? Or maybe some sort of booster? And also greater ability to customize fuselage blocks (change length, width, and height of individual corners, allowing greater detail). Also, some effects of G-forces would be cool.
Basically you just put the engines on rotators, make the range of motion from 15-45°, and set it so that they are controlled by pitch. @bolt
Exactly as advertised, I love it!
Nice, I have experimented with thrust vectoring as well. It's a real game-changer.
Smaller wings will make wing loading higher and decrease maneuverability. Bigger is better. @Planeez
Basically it needs to have the best maneuverability possible without sacrificing other areas of performance. @Planeez
Is there any practical use for this?
I love the idea!
Congrats! Just got silver myself too!
Thank you! @WWIIPlaneBuilder
@Bakon
Yeah, that's this? http://wowpp.gcdn.co/80EFB1/origin/2d/germany/me-262-hg2/germany-me-262-hg2-renders-en-1920x1080.jpg @GoblinDynamics
This is the HG III, and none were built. The HG II was of a much less radical design, looking much like the original 262, and as far as I know, only an HG I actually flew before the end of the war.
What??????????????????????????????
Heinkel Lerche
Yeah it's a pretty tricky part to get just right, couldn't get both good shape and length so I settled for the shape @Meawk
You could have done the prop cone yourself. For future reference, you can make any part fit where it normally can't just by rotating it four times. It will still appear red but in reality it will stay on, and the red will go away when you go to mirror it or after you play. Great work with the rest of the build though.
I love how smoothly it flies. Good job!
No problem @Remy9085
ayy lmao
Tried making it but it fried my potato
It performs just as good as it looks, flies straight and even outturns many prop planes I've made! @Meawk
Lmao same @Allstar
Noice
Besides the fact that the elevators are inverted I see nothing wrong. Just fix it in the wing settings by changing the inversion.
)))
A break @Meawk
The normal IL-2 didn't, the IL-2M did @WhenSupertogoPhysics
@swat132