Stats:
Speed 400 mph @ 10,000 ft (without engine mod)
Maneuverability: (at regular level speed 350 mph)
8 seconds full turn at 2000 ft (23 seconds at 30,000 ft)
4 seconds full roll at 5000 ft (4 seconds at 30,000 ft)
Armament:
1 x 30mm motor cannon 800 rpm 200 rds
2 x 20mm auto cannon 1000 rpm 500 rds each
Optional
2 x 20mm gondola 100 rds
1 x 500 kg bomb
1 x 300 litre drop tank
Armor:
Skin 0.5-0.55mm
Fore and aft bullet proof glass 67mm
Back seat 20mm
Floor 5mm (limited, only directly below pilot)
Front 15-20mm, thickens to 20mm when extending beyond engine frontal area
Time to climb:
15,000 ft 1.25 minutes (3 realistic)
30,000 ft 2.5 minutes (7 realistic)
Automatic supercharger
Self Sealing fuel tanks
Dimensions: (real dimensions, altered from original)
11.05m length
14m wingspan
Yes, I do, I wasted your time, confused you, and might theoretically possibly have annoyed you which is an adequate requirement for an apology. I read that you said a unique and etc aircraft would probably be featured. So under the assumption that a small carrier based fighter with a flight time of 5.3334 hours would be unique... No I don't want it sponsored, it's too simple and it would disgrace the front page. @TheLatentImage
My Zero ish object can fly for 5.33 (infinite repeating) hours on internal tank. Is that not unique for an aircraft of LESS than 9000 lb of mass?@TheLatentImage
And now apparently... Well; https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=brown%20noser and https://www.google.ca/search?q=obsequious&oq=obsequious&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
It does now seem that looking up to an excellent designer is a crime XD
I hope you would review my Type 27. I have flown it myself and it far outstrips the Type 8 mod.3 (previously renowned for being maneuverable; by myself alone) in maneuverability! It also has almost the same airspeed as the Type 8 Mod.4 with the same engine power. Granted, it has extremely dangerous ground handling and landing qualities which have to do with it having a poor landing gear arrangement, and the cowling is ugly, but I'd like to see how you like it
while the sides and front views aren't as good as the top view. It is a so very perfect aircraft. The sides and front don't seem as historically accurate as the side though, very sorry. I could not make an aircraft with this level of perfect. It is, well, excellent!
I do wonder, could it carry my torpedo? If you remove the fuel mass I added it would be much lighter. I do believe my torpedo is acceptable in performance. With a slight roll to starboard that is about 10m after traveling for 5 minutes. Maximum roll mind you.
I am sorry, I am very new to this field. You have turrets that can be affixed to the deck rather than my prototype bricks that require partial hull integration?
Ehh? I like constructive criticism. Tell me everything wrong with my planes and I'll take it without flinching. Please do. Just me though, I think I qualify as a bit thicker skinned than average, well now anyway.
They have no grounds for the harassment. You are an excellent designer, outstripping my own abilities considerably. Ignore all the hateful comments. I in fact am being hated on for listing issues with a plane that CANNOT TAKE OFF and giving it a 5/5. Welcome to logic, it's the internet, what more can you expect?
Depends on what you classify as "amazing". You see, it did not make the necessary design goals, so technically it has failed. But regardless, I thank you greatly for the rating and your opinions.
With the necessary armour required to stop an anti tank round which would in the first place punch through both sides without detonating is impossible. The supposed "Nazi tech" stuff is highly off. But I like the build, so you get a well deserved upvote.
I pray that you will give me a 2750 hp 200 inch propeller engine... @Walrusaircraft
While it is beautiful, the hind quarters of the aircraft look like they were hit by a shrink ray
Could you make a 2750 hp 200 inch propeller for me?
Stats:
Speed 400 mph @ 10,000 ft (without engine mod)
Maneuverability: (at regular level speed 350 mph)
8 seconds full turn at 2000 ft (23 seconds at 30,000 ft)
4 seconds full roll at 5000 ft (4 seconds at 30,000 ft)
Armament:
1 x 30mm motor cannon 800 rpm 200 rds
2 x 20mm auto cannon 1000 rpm 500 rds each
Optional
2 x 20mm gondola 100 rds
1 x 500 kg bomb
1 x 300 litre drop tank
Armor:
Skin 0.5-0.55mm
Fore and aft bullet proof glass 67mm
Back seat 20mm
Floor 5mm (limited, only directly below pilot)
Front 15-20mm, thickens to 20mm when extending beyond engine frontal area
Time to climb:
15,000 ft 1.25 minutes (3 realistic)
30,000 ft 2.5 minutes (7 realistic)
Automatic supercharger
Self Sealing fuel tanks
Dimensions: (real dimensions, altered from original)
11.05m length
14m wingspan
How about having the ability just to type in the size you want. That would work quite easily for the user.
@tominator http://www.tuskegee.edu/sites/www/uploads/files/About%20US/Airmen/NineMythsAbouttheTuskegee_Airmen.pdf
"_" between words nine myths about the Tuskegee airmen
@NovaTopaz
How is limitless beyond stupid? This way you could make non modded propeller blades for a helicopter.
Propeller engines
NACA profile, such as leading edge, trailing edge, etc
Skin thickness will increase or decrease weight, will dictate never exceed speed and measure durability.
Hardpoints ingame are not particularly suitable. There are no launch rails, no bomb racks, no internal bays etc.
Fly by Wire, hydraulics, etc.
Why I wrote underwater running I don't know, but I mean engines that are able to operate in vacuum, maybe I meant for torpedoes...
Which is naturally why there is a game with the map editing feature.
Are you sure about that? In the wing menu punch in angle numbers on the keyboard. Is it really that impossible?
You can alter the scale of the aircraft. It is so you can do smaller and more detailed small aircraft
Which is naturally why you can just add an ingame editor.
@tominator During the war...
They actually did lose a few bombers...
Is this based on my plane??? The only semblance I can see is the primary fuselage... Do I not get a cookie?
It was meant to be a guided ballistic missile. Of course I could control it! is bigger than USS tiny
I don't recall ever bothering to take a shot at it. In a plane of course, I made 100,000ft+ in a missile? Or Is it a spaceship? @Skua
At 100,000 ft. I don't suppose I should know why you got up there.
So much better than before... Relative to your previous aircraft of course
Yes, I do, I wasted your time, confused you, and might theoretically possibly have annoyed you which is an adequate requirement for an apology. I read that you said a unique and etc aircraft would probably be featured. So under the assumption that a small carrier based fighter with a flight time of 5.3334 hours would be unique... No I don't want it sponsored, it's too simple and it would disgrace the front page. @TheLatentImage
So that means it's nothing at all special right? I will delete my previous posts on this to clean up the mess I made. Sorry. @TheLatentImage
My Zero ish object can fly for 5.33 (infinite repeating) hours on internal tank. Is that not unique for an aircraft of LESS than 9000 lb of mass?@TheLatentImage
Lower fuel load out to 212 gallons for a realistic flight time and down to 170 gallons to be the actual load out.
Because you get 5.3334 hours of flight time with the 514 gallons...
@FlOu Yes, I am sorry to have confused you.
Freaked out? Do you understand how inaccurate and stupid red tails is? Do you understand me at all? No.
Comparing people is not at all a good thing. If you do it also depends on what you are comparing.
Also:
"Save us from the red tails. For the movie turned the actual people into monsters!"
If this counts as freaked out, your reply counts as an immortal hell fire.
And now apparently... Well; https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=brown%20noser and https://www.google.ca/search?q=obsequious&oq=obsequious&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
It does now seem that looking up to an excellent designer is a crime XD
I hope you would review my Type 27. I have flown it myself and it far outstrips the Type 8 mod.3 (previously renowned for being maneuverable; by myself alone) in maneuverability! It also has almost the same airspeed as the Type 8 Mod.4 with the same engine power. Granted, it has extremely dangerous ground handling and landing qualities which have to do with it having a poor landing gear arrangement, and the cowling is ugly, but I'd like to see how you like it
Why are you copying my boat?
I mean it is not an exact perfect like RL val, but it is awesome
You answered it lol
Not exactly a Val but so very excellent nonetheless
voted it first!
while the sides and front views aren't as good as the top view. It is a so very perfect aircraft. The sides and front don't seem as historically accurate as the side though, very sorry. I could not make an aircraft with this level of perfect. It is, well, excellent!
I do wonder, could it carry my torpedo? If you remove the fuel mass I added it would be much lighter. I do believe my torpedo is acceptable in performance. With a slight roll to starboard that is about 10m after traveling for 5 minutes. Maximum roll mind you.
I hate on red tails a bit. Sorry. Just all the historical inaccuracies, the really predictable plot. Etc.
Save us from the red tails. For the movie turned the actual people into monsters!
Correction; it is a super cruiser.
Senpai, could you test my torpedoes with your excellent sub? I need your expert opinion!
I am sorry, I am very new to this field. You have turrets that can be affixed to the deck rather than my prototype bricks that require partial hull integration?
Sorry for the error: No modded engines.
Ehh? I like constructive criticism. Tell me everything wrong with my planes and I'll take it without flinching. Please do. Just me though, I think I qualify as a bit thicker skinned than average, well now anyway.
exactly what does he mean by harassment?
@WeeBabySeamus could you say tell me where to put my suggestions?
They have no grounds for the harassment. You are an excellent designer, outstripping my own abilities considerably. Ignore all the hateful comments. I in fact am being hated on for listing issues with a plane that CANNOT TAKE OFF and giving it a 5/5. Welcome to logic, it's the internet, what more can you expect?
@goboygo1 the term spawning existed long before minecraft did.
... Honestly? My plane is getting COPIED?
Is that a good thing or a bad thing?
For those of us on mobile, it is unconvienient for you to make such a high part count. Could you make a simpler sub 150 part version?
The small elevators were to ensure you would not roll too fast and disable the elevators while turning. Thank you though!
Hey mate, give the original created credit.
How about a simpler version so my game can actually run this thing hmm?
use language in your titles? Do you mean his titles cannot have text? ;-) ______________ . @WeeBabySeamus, where do I toss my suggestions?
Depends on what you classify as "amazing". You see, it did not make the necessary design goals, so technically it has failed. But regardless, I thank you greatly for the rating and your opinions.
The description hurts my eyes but a good build.
With the necessary armour required to stop an anti tank round which would in the first place punch through both sides without detonating is impossible. The supposed "Nazi tech" stuff is highly off. But I like the build, so you get a well deserved upvote.
No, I mean how on earth is this even possible?!
What, how, just how do you do this?!