Add another set of wINgs BEcause at the moment ITs actually a monoplane, you could add more parts lIke that. Thats not to say you couldnt do more detaIl around the cowlIng, whIch would add at least 2 more parts, then theres the cockpIT and Blah Blah Blah. (To stop the awkward landing lower the elevators and horizontal stabilisers because the high CoL is causing the flipping)
It’s nice, although the gyro is unnecessary and ill have to count it as an extra part, so your position might take a hit from that, but really nice otherwise
Although there are some points i agree with here, as upvotes are very easy to farm and a lot of the time people with amazing builds can be pushed out of the spotlight, although upvote trading is very rare at best, but i dont see why people would want to post or go on the website if there was no way of gaining recognition or filtering out worse crafts, there will always be anomalies and theres not much you can do about people upvoting german corsair or things along those lines. Upvotes are reliable
REALLY sorry that i couldnt make it a successor, i tried moddin the xml it didnt work, anyway take my stupid build please https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4zGn12/Su-27-block
@TheOneAndOnlyToad why would you…
Poor helicopter
Do you mean Custom?
+1Prize for 1st is nitro for a month I guess lmao
+1ALRIGHT!
+31st https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/dJ83a6/M12K-Moth-Assault-Drone
2nd
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/7791t4/F4U-1C-Corsair
3rd
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/SuyVv0/Flanker-50-Parts
Yup@1471A
+1@UmTeslaCybertruck1907 thats not what im saying, you cant follow someone because they followed you and advertise it. Thats against the rules
Hey, maybe change your bio, upvote/follow trading isnt really allowed.
Nice build! Historical accuracy isnt too good, but the actual build is really cool!
+1@NEWCOUNTVIA so why would you say SimplePlanes is bad when you where the weak link, not the game?
10 days left
+1I cant accept this for 2 reasons, 1. It’s a not a successor 2. It has to be strictly 50 parts with no deadweights
@NEWCOUNTVIA why would you say that here
@FairFireFlight ok will do
+1I just learnt that my plane’s name is unoriginal
Because its just for the thumbnail, and I added one too many deadweights
+1🥵🥵🥵
+5Flat spin time
+2He be poggin
+1@FalcoOne yup, no weight editing, avoid using no collision but that wont take away points and you can use funky trees
+1Use the hollow fuselage part it will make your life a million times easier
Wow..
Add another set of wINgs BEcause at the moment ITs actually a monoplane, you could add more parts lIke that. Thats not to say you couldnt do more detaIl around the cowlIng, whIch would add at least 2 more parts, then theres the cockpIT and Blah Blah Blah. (To stop the awkward landing lower the elevators and horizontal stabilisers because the high CoL is causing the flipping)
Not Bad, I would recommend gIVING It a cockpIt canopy as otherwise the claIm that Its hIgh altItude makes no sense, exuse typos, my keyBoard Broke
It’s nice, although the gyro is unnecessary and ill have to count it as an extra part, so your position might take a hit from that, but really nice otherwise
Really nice! This is first so far
+1@Panzerwaifu69 as long as it doesnt affect preformance and if it’s something like that ill let it pass
+2@SpartanBallistics please stop being petty. i am going to be the one judging your build too.
+1It has to be a successor
@CommanderKeegan nope
+1@ColonelCanada sadly there’s a good chance it never will due to the nature of SimplePlanes
+2Im waiting for someone to do a one part cockpit lmao
+1Very nice!
+1@Panzerwaifu69 nope, as i said to @Bryan5 , if i never specified so you can go crazy with it
+2@XWorks no, he’s a 2nd cousin of mine though lmao
+1Very detailed boxes! Well worth the updoot!
+1@Bryan5 all, i never said it had to be a specific period
+1@Miguel38531 sim, é um exemplo.
+2Cute! :D
+1@XWorks well the counted it, and we both know it was ment for the challenge
@MrCOPTY as long as it obides by the rules, yes
+2(This applies to all of you!)
@XWorks i was just joking about the fact that you made an su-27 after me for the same challenge
@Reworkable ill see
+1Although there are some points i agree with here, as upvotes are very easy to farm and a lot of the time people with amazing builds can be pushed out of the spotlight, although upvote trading is very rare at best, but i dont see why people would want to post or go on the website if there was no way of gaining recognition or filtering out worse crafts, there will always be anomalies and theres not much you can do about people upvoting german corsair or things along those lines. Upvotes are reliable
I would love to see what would happen if the character was male
+6@MrCOPTY he never said under 25, he said over 25
+1you son of a…
:hehehehaw:
@SheriffHackdogMCPE curators are chosen by hand, not randomly.
REALLY sorry that i couldnt make it a successor, i tried moddin the xml it didnt work, anyway take my stupid build please https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4zGn12/Su-27-block