The Erlik missile is dangerous to the plane that launched it. She writes somersaults in the air and cannot catch up with more than one plane. The plane itself is good, it is small, which makes it difficult to get on it.
The plane is beautiful, neatly made, but ... I did not understand for what reason, the plane periodically breaks into a tailspin. As for me, the aircraft has too weak armament for conducting air combat. (If what I compared with MC-1D and S-8M (P)).
Great, with the new engines it is faster and more powerful. The most important thing is that now the aircraft has a large modernization resource. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
The plane looks cool, but: The j 15 engines do not pull it, at least j50 or j90 must be installed with air intakes; no protection against missiles; the bomb load is too small for such a large aircraft. 2 more problems: poor weight distribution of the aircraft (the rear is heavier than the front), the aerodynamics are very poor (you can see through the scanner that the engines and the entire front of the aircraft are red).
Проект крылатой бомбы с ручным управлением. (2 - сброс правой бомбы, 4 - парашут), (3 - сброс левой бомбы, 5 - парашут) обе бомбы управляются правым джойстиком. Я пока не могу разделить управление бомбами и самолётом носителем. Если кто знает как это сделать, напишите пожалуйста в комментариях.
Poor weight distribution, too sharp roll control, poor vertical maneuverability. Firepower and fuel are excessive. With a sharp maneuver at a speed of less than 500, the aircraft goes into a tailspin. Obviously, the plane is an attack aircraft in class, but for an attack aircraft it is too fast, plus a lot of shaking during the flight.
@Selcukk Aircraft models from S-2md-2 (Sh.) To S-4PKM-IP and S-5IVP are multipurpose aircraft with a bias towards the attack aircraft or interceptor. Low maneuverability is a compromise. But I think the next "S" series aircraft will be more maneuverable in the future.
The aircraft has become much better, but the maneuverability for air combat at close range is not enough (S-5IVP and S-4IBP twist it and destroy it with a machine gun). But it is 100% protected from missiles (S-5IVP never hit it with a missile)
Pros: fast, beautiful, small silhouette. Cons: clumsy, weak armament, no machine guns and missile traps. He cannot fight aircraft, either crashes on the ground, or is shot down in 12-20 seconds.
The Erlik missile is dangerous to the plane that launched it. She writes somersaults in the air and cannot catch up with more than one plane. The plane itself is good, it is small, which makes it difficult to get on it.
+1А задержка через панель вводится ignitionDelay и время в секундах
@AdMiRaLSoviet Меня больше смущает, что при сбросе ракеты о створки люка бьются)
The plane is beautiful, neatly made, but ... I did not understand for what reason, the plane periodically breaks into a tailspin. As for me, the aircraft has too weak armament for conducting air combat. (If what I compared with MC-1D and S-8M (P)).
I have a building limit. I'll do it tomorrow.
@Selcukk :)
+1@Clutch Thank you) I think that following the same principle, I will remake the SH-2K and make a new one based on the MC-1D.
@Clutch
👍🏻
Everything is great, only the tank is essentially useless.
👍🏻
Tomorrow there will be a ship-based version of this aircraft. The type will be VTOL aircraft.
👍🏻
@AdMiRaLSoviet привет)
Great, with the new engines it is faster and more powerful. The most important thing is that now the aircraft has a large modernization resource. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
The plane looks cool, but: The j 15 engines do not pull it, at least j50 or j90 must be installed with air intakes; no protection against missiles; the bomb load is too small for such a large aircraft. 2 more problems: poor weight distribution of the aircraft (the rear is heavier than the front), the aerodynamics are very poor (you can see through the scanner that the engines and the entire front of the aircraft are red).
👍🏻
@AdMiRaLSoviet Я уже тоже устал. Поэтому потихоньку начинаю в майнкрафт возвращаться.
@AdMiRaLSoviet экзамены?
Проект крылатой бомбы с ручным управлением. (2 - сброс правой бомбы, 4 - парашут), (3 - сброс левой бомбы, 5 - парашут) обе бомбы управляются правым джойстиком. Я пока не могу разделить управление бомбами и самолётом носителем. Если кто знает как это сделать, напишите пожалуйста в комментариях.
+3👍🏻
Poor weight distribution, too sharp roll control, poor vertical maneuverability. Firepower and fuel are excessive. With a sharp maneuver at a speed of less than 500, the aircraft goes into a tailspin. Obviously, the plane is an attack aircraft in class, but for an attack aircraft it is too fast, plus a lot of shaking during the flight.
+1Thank you)
I made it to carry 10 cleavers, but in the end he lifted 15.
@AdMiRaLSoviet И по высоте он достиг 46.000ft (без подвеса)
@AdMiRaLSoviet Да, у него грузоподъемность большая (15 тяжёлых ракет воздух-поверхность)
@Selcukk Aircraft models from S-2md-2 (Sh.) To S-4PKM-IP and S-5IVP are multipurpose aircraft with a bias towards the attack aircraft or interceptor. Low maneuverability is a compromise. But I think the next "S" series aircraft will be more maneuverable in the future.
+1@AdMiRaLSoviet S-4PK (P- 50мм пушки, K- корабельный) готов, нужно вечера ждать, так как у меня лимит по постройкам(
The aircraft has become much better, but the maneuverability for air combat at close range is not enough (S-5IVP and S-4IBP twist it and destroy it with a machine gun). But it is 100% protected from missiles (S-5IVP never hit it with a missile)
+1@AdMiRaLSoviet по ттх S-5 лучше, но по визуалу - да, красивый)
Pros: fast, beautiful, small silhouette. Cons: clumsy, weak armament, no machine guns and missile traps. He cannot fight aircraft, either crashes on the ground, or is shot down in 12-20 seconds.
Hallo, Genosse!