Development ideas:
1) Military assault aircraft.
2) Attack and multipurpose helicopters.
3) Light wheeled armored vehicles and trucks.
4) Attack and military transport ekranoplan.
I read all the rules and I had questions:
1) The number of towers and main guns. Let's say I want to make 2-3 independent combat modules. Is this allowed?
2) I looked after the wheelbase, but I don't really like it. Can I make major design changes? (I'm going to put 2 engines instead of one; move the fuel tanks; make the car waterfloat)
The armament is good. As for the helicopter, it will be possible to give it the name "match", because it burns out just as quickly. 10 out of 10 sorties ended after the first hit anywhere, after which the helicopter caught fire and fell.
@UAIBrasil By the way, about military aircraft. There is a challenge to build an attack aircraft. Do you want to take part?https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/rvPrOp/HVY-CAS-Challenge
@UAIBrasil Yes, I know, glass is better. I did not bother to remodel the cockpit on this aircraft, as the main goal was to gain experience in creating an engine with deflected vector thrust. In fact, all S-11s are experimental aircraft. I think the S-12 and all the aircraft after them will have a glass cockpit.
@UAIBrasil Thank you, I will continue to refine this car, or rather its ability to move on water. By the way, I installed the rearview mirrors from your truck.
Everything is fine, only the rear tail rotor screws are not needed with the coaxial scheme of the main propellers. They are superfluous, if you remove them, the helicopter feels better in the air.
@3aa423 And the origin is a moot point. I recognized the name - coaxial propeller. The idea of using a coaxial propeller in aviation belongs to Britain, but the idea itself was proposed in 1754 by Lomonosov. The first more or less successful helicopters with such a scheme were made by Igor Sikorsky, and almost all serial machines, and Kamov was the only one who began to massively make helicopters with such a scheme.
@3aa423 I don't remember the correct name of such a scheme, and since this scheme is probably only used by Kamov in the world, for clarity, I put it this way.
@3aa423 All helicopters of the Kamov family (KA-25, KA-27, KA-50, KA-52) have 2 main propellers that rotate in different directions. Helicopters with such a device are more stable in flight.
@Cerdd Yes, the fact is that the S-9M2 and the models based on it are more of an interceptor, which is bad in close combat. To compensate for this disadvantage, the aircraft has powerful weapons that prevent the enemy from approaching. At the same time, the aircraft has great speed and armor to withstand fire and break away from pursuit. This is a compromise: the lack of maneuverability is compensated for by firepower and survivability.
@UAIBrasil Thanks!
@NikitaAsus thanks!
Development ideas:
1) Military assault aircraft.
2) Attack and multipurpose helicopters.
3) Light wheeled armored vehicles and trucks.
4) Attack and military transport ekranoplan.
Very cool, I like it.👍🏻
With proper skill, the ekranoplan can move along flat beaches.
@AdMiRaLSoviet вообще-то нет, но теперь, думаю, да)
Instruction in English is available.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/KL1Qfu/BTR-282PBM-challenge
I was in a hurry, so I take off the BTR-282PB from the challenge. Instead, there will be a BTR-282PBM
[7]-lights l; [6]- drop ATGM boxs
I read all the rules and I had questions:
1) The number of towers and main guns. Let's say I want to make 2-3 independent combat modules. Is this allowed?
2) I looked after the wheelbase, but I don't really like it. Can I make major design changes? (I'm going to put 2 engines instead of one; move the fuel tanks; make the car waterfloat)
I'm join
The weapon system is very cool. Advice: on TAIL ROTOR, in the Mode item, set HEAD HOLD, then the helicopter will not rotate in the air.
The armament is good. As for the helicopter, it will be possible to give it the name "match", because it burns out just as quickly. 10 out of 10 sorties ended after the first hit anywhere, after which the helicopter caught fire and fell.
👍🏻
@TheDesignate ok
How many cars can one person submit to the challenge?
I am participating
@AdMiRaLSoviet Ага, самое интересное ниже этой машины.
FBM-7; SH-4M2M; STRELA-M6M и т.д.
Особо рекомендую VA-5PTM и MAV-2.
@UAIBrasil Thanks a lot)
@Walvis Thanks! 🙂
The cockpit is steep and the missiles move out steeply, but it does not correspond to the attack aircraft class at all.
@UAIBrasil By the way, about military aircraft. There is a challenge to build an attack aircraft. Do you want to take part?https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/rvPrOp/HVY-CAS-Challenge
@UAIBrasil Great, I'll wait for the new version)
@UAIBrasil Especially vertical, horizontal too, but not so critical.
Against the general background of a beautiful aircraft, the tail unit is not very beautiful
@UAIBrasil Yes, I know, glass is better. I did not bother to remodel the cockpit on this aircraft, as the main goal was to gain experience in creating an engine with deflected vector thrust. In fact, all S-11s are experimental aircraft. I think the S-12 and all the aircraft after them will have a glass cockpit.
Cool! I really liked this plane! 👍🏻👍🏻
@Clutch 😆👍🏻
@Clutch Thanks a lot!)
@UAIBrasil Thank you!
I forgot to specify [7] + [Throttle + VTOL] - vehicle control while driving on water. And also the car can fire on the move or afloat.
@ALTMTR This is for better stability when driving.
@UAIBrasil Thank you, I will continue to refine this car, or rather its ability to move on water. By the way, I installed the rearview mirrors from your truck.
@AdMiRaLSoviet Hallo, Genosse! Как проходит работа по освоению Дальнего Востока.
@UAIBrasil Yes, they are mostly on KamAZ, but they can also be found on DT-30 Vityaz, BTR-80/82 (Pantsir-C1-O) or BMP-3 (TKB-841)
@UAIBrasil "Pancir S1"
Congratulations!👏🏻🎉
@UAIBrasil Yes, I made the headlights like the UAZ-452 "Loaf", and the three upper lights like the ZiL-131 trucks)
Cool, very cool! Viet Cong liked🇻🇳👍🏻
Everything is fine, only the rear tail rotor screws are not needed with the coaxial scheme of the main propellers. They are superfluous, if you remove them, the helicopter feels better in the air.
Something this plane is not very successful in comparison with the previous ones.
Cool👍🏻
👍🏻
@3aa423 Sorry, I just pay a lot of attention to details :)
@3aa423 And the origin is a moot point. I recognized the name - coaxial propeller. The idea of using a coaxial propeller in aviation belongs to Britain, but the idea itself was proposed in 1754 by Lomonosov. The first more or less successful helicopters with such a scheme were made by Igor Sikorsky, and almost all serial machines, and Kamov was the only one who began to massively make helicopters with such a scheme.
@3aa423 I don't remember the correct name of such a scheme, and since this scheme is probably only used by Kamov in the world, for clarity, I put it this way.
@3aa423 All helicopters of the Kamov family (KA-25, KA-27, KA-50, KA-52) have 2 main propellers that rotate in different directions. Helicopters with such a device are more stable in flight.
The helical circuit is not very good. According to Kamov's principle, it seems to me it will be easier and better. And the look is cool.
@Cerdd Yes, the fact is that the S-9M2 and the models based on it are more of an interceptor, which is bad in close combat. To compensate for this disadvantage, the aircraft has powerful weapons that prevent the enemy from approaching. At the same time, the aircraft has great speed and armor to withstand fire and break away from pursuit. This is a compromise: the lack of maneuverability is compensated for by firepower and survivability.