I would also like to praise the painting of the F-80. Against the background of the sky, the white wing is poorly visible, which makes it seem that it is not there and the plane was shot down. This is a very cool camouflage that disorients the enemy.
This is my opinion, in principle, about all your planes. Each of them is very beautiful and comfortable to operate, but weak armament negates all its strengths. Concrete example: F-80 versus my S-9M2. Several accurate rounds of the F-80 failed to shoot him down. The very same F-80 fell at the first hit. From here comes the second problem - the fuel tanks in the wings, which are very easy to hit with a machine gun.
@3aa423 Thank you, but the S-7 and S-8 series are the worst. Best suited for aerial combat are the S-9M2, S-9K2 and the new S-10E. They have better maneuverability and more powerful armament.
The plane is beautiful, neatly made, but ... I did not understand for what reason, the plane periodically breaks into a tailspin. As for me, the aircraft has too weak armament for conducting air combat. (If what I compared with MC-1D and S-8M (P)).
Great, with the new engines it is faster and more powerful. The most important thing is that now the aircraft has a large modernization resource. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
The plane looks cool, but: The j 15 engines do not pull it, at least j50 or j90 must be installed with air intakes; no protection against missiles; the bomb load is too small for such a large aircraft. 2 more problems: poor weight distribution of the aircraft (the rear is heavier than the front), the aerodynamics are very poor (you can see through the scanner that the engines and the entire front of the aircraft are red).
Pros: fast, beautiful, small silhouette. Cons: clumsy, weak armament, no machine guns and missile traps. He cannot fight aircraft, either crashes on the ground, or is shot down in 12-20 seconds.
@Cerdd Well, it's better that the plane will live a little longer and do a little more :)
I would also like to praise the painting of the F-80. Against the background of the sky, the white wing is poorly visible, which makes it seem that it is not there and the plane was shot down. This is a very cool camouflage that disorients the enemy.
This is my opinion, in principle, about all your planes. Each of them is very beautiful and comfortable to operate, but weak armament negates all its strengths. Concrete example: F-80 versus my S-9M2. Several accurate rounds of the F-80 failed to shoot him down. The very same F-80 fell at the first hit. From here comes the second problem - the fuel tanks in the wings, which are very easy to hit with a machine gun.
@3aa423 Thank you, but the S-7 and S-8 series are the worst. Best suited for aerial combat are the S-9M2, S-9K2 and the new S-10E. They have better maneuverability and more powerful armament.
Cool👍🏻
Very beautiful, but the tail and elevators look ugly and rather weak armament.
А задержка через панель вводится ignitionDelay и время в секундах
@AdMiRaLSoviet Меня больше смущает, что при сбросе ракеты о створки люка бьются)
The plane is beautiful, neatly made, but ... I did not understand for what reason, the plane periodically breaks into a tailspin. As for me, the aircraft has too weak armament for conducting air combat. (If what I compared with MC-1D and S-8M (P)).
I have a building limit. I'll do it tomorrow.
@Clutch Thank you) I think that following the same principle, I will remake the SH-2K and make a new one based on the MC-1D.
@Clutch
👍🏻
Everything is great, only the tank is essentially useless.
👍🏻
Tomorrow there will be a ship-based version of this aircraft. The type will be VTOL aircraft.
👍🏻
@AdMiRaLSoviet привет)
Great, with the new engines it is faster and more powerful. The most important thing is that now the aircraft has a large modernization resource. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
The plane looks cool, but: The j 15 engines do not pull it, at least j50 or j90 must be installed with air intakes; no protection against missiles; the bomb load is too small for such a large aircraft. 2 more problems: poor weight distribution of the aircraft (the rear is heavier than the front), the aerodynamics are very poor (you can see through the scanner that the engines and the entire front of the aircraft are red).
👍🏻
@AdMiRaLSoviet Я уже тоже устал. Поэтому потихоньку начинаю в майнкрафт возвращаться.
@AdMiRaLSoviet экзамены?
👍🏻
Thank you)
I made it to carry 10 cleavers, but in the end he lifted 15.
@AdMiRaLSoviet И по высоте он достиг 46.000ft (без подвеса)
@AdMiRaLSoviet Да, у него грузоподъемность большая (15 тяжёлых ракет воздух-поверхность)
@AdMiRaLSoviet S-4PK (P- 50мм пушки, K- корабельный) готов, нужно вечера ждать, так как у меня лимит по постройкам(
@AdMiRaLSoviet по ттх S-5 лучше, но по визуалу - да, красивый)
Pros: fast, beautiful, small silhouette. Cons: clumsy, weak armament, no machine guns and missile traps. He cannot fight aircraft, either crashes on the ground, or is shot down in 12-20 seconds.
Hallo, Genosse!