Little known fact:
Owning a cat is not owning a pet, it is coexisting with a genetically engineered killing machine that you do not own because it owns you.
@TheCommentaryGuy I found those after I finished the plane on an X-Planes 11 modding forum as well. I'm guessing the model is ripped from AC7 since it has the laser pods. If I do a darkstar again, I'll use them and see how off I was.
@FujiwaraAutoShop Lockheed Martin's website page for the Darkstar makes no mention of the designation SR-72.
.
In this article, a Lockheed Martin Spokesperson states that the Darkstar shown in the film is not representative of the work actually happening at Lockheed Martin.
.
Additionally, the Darkstar is manned while the SR-72 is projected to be a UAV, according to Lockheed Martin as of 2015.
.
While it is commonly referred to as SR-72, I have not seen the Darkstar designated SR-72 in neither the film or official statements from Lockheed Martin yet. And I can't think of a reason to reveal your new military tech in a movie? (Then again, this is America...) AlThOuGh It'S tHe GoVeRnMeNt AnD tHeY'rE oBvIoUsLy HiDiNg SoMeThInG or something.
It could be asymmetric drag or lift.
- Check the drag viewer
- Make sure your wings are the same type on each side
- Make sure any vertical wings are set to symmetric
@Directbean724 @IMFLYINHERE War thunder low tier USA is stacked
SBD-3 w/ DGP-1 gunpods = 6x 50 cal at BR 1.7, which can be reduced to 1.3 in air AB
You can literally get a double ace every match without even trying very hard
The only reason Gaijin hasn't uptiered it yet is because not a lot of people know about this exploit
@rexzion I put a torque cancelling system for the rotary engine since it became uncontrollable when rotating at full speed
.
I had issues with it before but that might've completely removed it actually
Although I guess its easier to take off now :v
@BeastHunter not quite
+1all gas no such thing as brakes
:D
+1Little known fact:
+2Owning a cat is not owning a pet, it is coexisting with a genetically engineered killing machine that you do not own because it owns you.
@OrionIndustries I didnt even realize it was all your stuff lol
I just see callsign in the title and monke brain gets neuron activation
Simpolplans 2???🤨
+9<<This is AWACS FartStar, confirmed. Intercept and identify the bogies.>>
FOR THE EMPEROR!
+1I also made some slight changes to the F/A-18F's flight model to be consistent with this one.
@TRD @Ren @BestBuilderEverNOCAP
@TheCommentaryGuy @BeastHunter @donkski
+1@TheCommentaryGuy I found those after I finished the plane on an X-Planes 11 modding forum as well. I'm guessing the model is ripped from AC7 since it has the laser pods. If I do a darkstar again, I'll use them and see how off I was.
This should be closed now, shouldn't it?
+1@AdmiralWheatman Yes, it is going through final checks
@asteroidbook345 I always associated that song with the war in general, but I guess it's more of a huey vibe lol
IAS/343 will give you mach at sea level.
+1There probably is a way to make it account for altitude but I haven't tried that
using it i think
<<This is AWACS PooperScooper, you are to take off and fly heading 070 and yeet some bogies.>>
+2time to celebrate
before the green
@FujiwaraAutoShop Lockheed Martin's website page for the Darkstar makes no mention of the designation SR-72.
+4.
In this article, a Lockheed Martin Spokesperson states that the Darkstar shown in the film is not representative of the work actually happening at Lockheed Martin.
.
Additionally, the Darkstar is manned while the SR-72 is projected to be a UAV, according to Lockheed Martin as of 2015.
.
While it is commonly referred to as SR-72, I have not seen the Darkstar designated SR-72 in neither the film or official statements from Lockheed Martin yet. And I can't think of a reason to reveal your new military tech in a movie? (Then again, this is America...)
AlThOuGh It'S tHe GoVeRnMeNt AnD tHeY'rE oBvIoUsLy HiDiNg SoMeThInG or something.
@Harder258 @FujiwaraAutoShop It is never referred to SR-72 in the film. The SR-72 is a completely and slightly more real different development.
+2You're gonna have to take them from my cold, dead hands!
Tell a friend?
@Nerfaddict That is innaccurate
+2@Reworkable im weird and like the low poly aesthetic
@asteroidbook345 Find out next time on...
+1@Ren @BestBuilderEverNOCAP
@G2 @OkaNieba @donkski
@TheCommentaryGuy @X99STRIKER @Bryan5
@HighMike @TheFlyingHusky @BeastHunter
+1How stable is it in VTOL?
Always save before undoing
I miss the dislike button...
big rip
+1Welcome to the club
+1suspension
@HuskyDynamics01 you did the thing
+1smooth(brain,0)
+5trstr
+2God I love playing chess and then getting to use a BGM-71 TOW missile to assert my dominance
+7It could be asymmetric drag or lift.
- Check the drag viewer
- Make sure your wings are the same type on each side
- Make sure any vertical wings are set to symmetric
@Directbean724 @IMFLYINHERE War thunder low tier USA is stacked
+3SBD-3 w/ DGP-1 gunpods = 6x 50 cal at BR 1.7, which can be reduced to 1.3 in air AB
You can literally get a double ace every match without even trying very hard
The only reason Gaijin hasn't uptiered it yet is because not a lot of people know about this exploit
Wow its actually less parts than mine
Witwenmacher
37mm howitzer, tricycle landing gear on a single-engine prop during the 40's, car style doors, MID ENGINED?
+6God the P-63 is weird but I love it
@TheWeebREBORN jeremy clarkson brain activated
+1Oh you like SimplePlanes? Name every user,
+8Reworkable:
@Nerfaddict Your sacrifice will not be in vain
+1@G2 👀
+2@KnightOfRen Thanks! That's weird to think about
@Tookan When you're in a flight of 8 S.E.5a's and a triplane is outflying all of you
@rexzion I put a torque cancelling system for the rotary engine since it became uncontrollable when rotating at full speed
+1.
I had issues with it before but that might've completely removed it actually
Although I guess its easier to take off now :v