@jamesPLANESii , i've gotten into something of a competing position with AeroTactical, so can you make a backstory for this for my company standpoint? It was going out of business till the YAF-173 was built, and then the company(me) made the KR-19.
Design: 10/10(reminds me of an F-4)
Top speed: 5/10
Turn rate: 12/15
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 13/15
Taking this one for the contest, it's rated higher.
Design: 9/10
Top speed: 4/10
Turn rate: 4/15(turns fine, but sluggish)
Climb rate: 7/15
Final rating: 13/15
So close! Keep up the good work- you do get one more submission, after all!
Hold it. I put in structural wings, which can't have control surfaces, yet it's one wing which does have it. Sorry, i have to disqualify- you replaced the structural wings with primary wings.
Design: 10/10
Top speed: 4/10
Turn rate: 3/15(turns fine, but very sluggish)
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 9/15
Aerodynamically sound, but needs improvement.
@AeroTactical you did not say ANYTHING that it had to be realistic! Even then, this is (loosely) based on the Bv-141! Even if it's disqualified, can you still rate it?
Design: 8/10
Speed: 5/10
Turn rate: 11/15
Climb rate: 13/15
Final rating: 12/15
Excellent! Also, i see what you wrote on the fuselage. I'm not a dog (-_-"), but it's very clever!
Imagine you're just flying something around, and then you see this flying at you- i just realized how scary this could be after an AI spawned in one and it ended up right behind me and ended my life in seconds-
@MiG15bis Technically, it's your younger brother- wait WHAT
+1This... just. Why? (This is a joke)
+1Tasty- dies from eating lava
@Warthundertypegy1 @MiG15bis What?
Oh jesus christ.
@WzNick It's physically impossible to stress me out with this challenge. I have another one going at the same time.
Alright, thanks for the clarification @WzNick ! @Halcyon215 , that would be a fine thing to build!
@Warthundertypegy1 how did a literal 2nd generation jet comment on this post?! @MiG15bis ?!?!
@WzNick Thanks for the spotlight!
@Halcyon215 Sure!
Alright, that'll take a while but it's not impossible.
While testing this just now, i figured out it can kind of fly with all of the main wings on one side missing. Don't ask how i figured that out.
@jamesPLANESii , i've gotten into something of a competing position with AeroTactical, so can you make a backstory for this for my company standpoint? It was going out of business till the YAF-173 was built, and then the company(me) made the KR-19.
@jamesPLANESii Alright, thanks!
@SupremeSpeed25 You don't get into this, this is a 'competing companies only' argument.
I don't know what that is, @Halcyon215 . Go ahead.
@Enthusiastic1planes Rated it and spotlighted it.
I have one issue, it noses down very hard with the slightest turn in Supersonic mode. 8/10 though, pretty good!
@Warthundertypegy1 I agree with @USAMustang . This is absolute cinema- i'm sorry for the brainrot, but it's true.
@Enthusiastic1planes Now, is that sarcasm?
Design: 10/10
Top speed: 9/10
Turn rate: 14/15
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 14/15
I'm not even joking, this thing might actually win the contest.
@Halcyon215 I'd love to see your take on this challenge!
@Halcyon215 You're not wrong. I assume he used a Boom 25 because it's lighter.
@AeroTactical Alright, i deserved that one.
@AeroTactical Just you wait and see.
@AeroTactical Soon, we will be competing fiercely...
@ThatrandomguywholikesSP Would you like to make an aircraft to compete with the KR-19 i just recently posted?
@AeroTactical A competing company emerges...
If this gets 5 upvotes, i will make an even more asymmetric aircraft.
@Halcyon215 Use this on the ice base. You will very rapidly see it's not.
The new one, @ThatrandomguywholikesSP , got a higher rating, so i'm taking that one for the contest.
Design: 10/10(reminds me of an F-4)
Top speed: 5/10
Turn rate: 12/15
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 13/15
Taking this one for the contest, it's rated higher.
@ThatrandomguywholikesSP Alright, i'll take your word for it. No longer disqualified.
@Liensis If you want an example of asymmetry, check my build. It doesn't count for points, but it's helpful.
@AeroTactical Okay, i figured it out. Sorry again.
Design: 9/10
Top speed: 4/10
Turn rate: 4/15(turns fine, but sluggish)
Climb rate: 7/15
Final rating: 13/15
So close! Keep up the good work- you do get one more submission, after all!
I apologize. I'm not sure how, and i didn't know i had to ask.
Hold it. I put in structural wings, which can't have control surfaces, yet it's one wing which does have it. Sorry, i have to disqualify- you replaced the structural wings with primary wings.
Design: 10/10
Top speed: 4/10
Turn rate: 3/15(turns fine, but very sluggish)
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 9/15
Aerodynamically sound, but needs improvement.
@Supersoli8 Well, dammit.
@Liensis The sides are not the same. Look up the Bv-141, that's a great example of this.
@Liensis I'd honestly like to see you make an asymmetric submission. I'll rate that one, too, and we'll take the highest number, eh?
I'm uprating this to 9/15- it can fly on one engine, although not well.
Design: 10/10
Turn rate: 4/10
Top speed: 6/15
Climb rate: 10/15
Final rating: 8/15
It's alright, but could use some improvement.
@AeroTactical you did not say ANYTHING that it had to be realistic! Even then, this is (loosely) based on the Bv-141! Even if it's disqualified, can you still rate it?
Also, it's based on the Bv-141.
You did not say that in the post!... Even if it's disqualified, can you rate it?
I'm going to raise this to 13/15. I set the engines to different groups with ZeroonDeactivate active, and it flies very well on one engine.
Design: 8/10
Speed: 5/10
Turn rate: 11/15
Climb rate: 13/15
Final rating: 12/15
Excellent! Also, i see what you wrote on the fuselage. I'm not a dog (-_-"), but it's very clever!
Imagine you're just flying something around, and then you see this flying at you- i just realized how scary this could be after an AI spawned in one and it ended up right behind me and ended my life in seconds-