@Thegamer01 this looks kinda like a copy. I can see some small changes, but I'm not convinced that they're enough. Can you explain what you changed for me, please?
@Mox if there's a good functional change, I'll leave it up. Otherwise, removal.
As mentioned by other users, please do not name planes after YouTubers. This post will be removed, but it can be put back up if you change the name and reply to me.
All of your uploads so far have been copies. They have been removed, so I hope you will start afresh and upload your own content instead of stealing it from others. Further copying will result in a ban.
@CanofBeans flat bottom airfoils produce the most lift at no angle of attack. Symmetric produces none, semi symmetric is in the middle. Those are for making sure that your plane flies level with no control input
Waisting - this is only really relevant at transonic speeds, which is why today's fighters don't have it - they have enough sheer power to bulldoze straight through the transonic region and in to higher supersonic regions, where waisting isn't so useful any more. SP doesn't really include mach effects like that anyway.
Swept wings - whilst this is really important in real life, SP doesn't actually model it.
Canards - not specifically better for high-speed flight, but often useful because jet-engined planes will have their CoM pretty far back. Canards can be further away from this and therefore make better use of a smaller control surface.
Please don't swear on the site. This post has been removed, but if you sort the language and reply to me then I'll put it back up. This goes for all five of your planes.
@BaconEggs obviously take the sensible precautions to back up everything that you should, but I personally feel that 10 is an enormous improvement. I kinda hated 8, though, so my opinion is a little coloured by that.
Please don't name planes after YouTubers. We get a lot of people doing this, and it's basically just spam to everyone else. This post has been removed, but it can go back up if you change the name and reply to me.
@Sutairs mate, come on. I hate that I need to remove Honda posts but it's to prevent potential serious legal action against Jundroo. I know it sucks, but that's the way it is.
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
That plane is cool, I haven't seen that before. It seems like a pretty good idea if the technical challenges can be overcome, turnaround would be virtually zero.
My own choice is probably the Fanwing, which is similar to Anton Flettner's Magnus effect designs.
@HellFireKoder this seems relevant to your interests
@AceSquadIndustries unless Jundroo decide to do something like buying the rights for the multiplayer mod, I don't think it could be paid for anyway
@Mod @Flightsonic you guys are making me blush. See, even my Mod icon has gone all red
Please don't upload things that you didn't make. Uploading edits is fine but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify it.
@SimpleTechAndResearch that's the account's only activity ever, so I've just deleted it
@Thegamer01 this looks kinda like a copy. I can see some small changes, but I'm not convinced that they're enough. Can you explain what you changed for me, please?
@Mox if there's a good functional change, I'll leave it up. Otherwise, removal.
Please don't upload things that you didn't make. Uploading edits is fine but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify it.
As mentioned by other users, please do not name planes after YouTubers. This post will be removed, but it can be put back up if you change the name and reply to me.
All of your uploads so far have been copies. They have been removed, so I hope you will start afresh and upload your own content instead of stealing it from others. Further copying will result in a ban.
@SimpleTechAndResearch there's not really anything I can do about that, sorry
@jamesPLANESii I can try if I get time
@USA2001 also I didn't realise this was from so long ago, someone just reported it. Sorry about that
@USA2001 no worries, just be careful in future. Thanks!
Please don't upload things that you didn't make. Uploading edits is fine but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify it.
@PINK nope, very definitely flat bottom > semi-symmetric > symmetric in order from highest to lowest lift.
@Spudgun239 no worries, just try to keep it a bit more reasonable in future.
@stealthyfan thanks!
@CanofBeans flat bottom airfoils produce the most lift at no angle of attack. Symmetric produces none, semi symmetric is in the middle. Those are for making sure that your plane flies level with no control input
A couple of corrections:
Waisting - this is only really relevant at transonic speeds, which is why today's fighters don't have it - they have enough sheer power to bulldoze straight through the transonic region and in to higher supersonic regions, where waisting isn't so useful any more. SP doesn't really include mach effects like that anyway.
Swept wings - whilst this is really important in real life, SP doesn't actually model it.
Canards - not specifically better for high-speed flight, but often useful because jet-engined planes will have their CoM pretty far back. Canards can be further away from this and therefore make better use of a smaller control surface.
The other stuff is good, though.
Don't beg for upvotes, that's just spam. Andrew's photo shows up on literally the first row of google images if you search his name anyway.
@Itamar3553 I think BaconAircrafts was just frustrated that s/he had to wait to upvote you
@pixelconcqueror well, criticism is fine, but it needs to be something useful and constructive. Bonehead's comment wasn't that
Please don't post things that you didn't make. It's fine to post edits, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify it.
Please don't post things that you didn't make. It's fine to post edits, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify it.
Please don't swear on the site. This post has been removed, but if you sort the language and reply to me then I'll put it back up. This goes for all five of your planes.
Please don't swear on the site. This post has been removed, but if you sort the language and reply to me then I'll put it back up.
@BaconEggs obviously take the sensible precautions to back up everything that you should, but I personally feel that 10 is an enormous improvement. I kinda hated 8, though, so my opinion is a little coloured by that.
@kikasshes yeah, I reckon that those should count as punctuation anyway. It's like a happy full stop!
If you're on Windows 10, the built-in game recording thing is pretty handy
@kikasshes in my defence, there was no capital because the quote originally started with "Warbrine". The full stop was... definitely laziness hahaha.
@Flightsonic yeah, by this point I basically just avoid using it whenever possible haha
Please don't post things that you didn't make. It's fine to post edits, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify it.
@Simpleplanesnumber809070 no problem, just remember the rules in future
@kikasshes that's the one. This seems fine anyway, since it does actually make a pretty big functional difference by adding the new wheels
@Manboy yeah, basically it's so that the features can help newer players get some attention
Please don't post things that you didn't make. It's fine to post edits, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify it.
Please don't name planes after YouTubers. We get a lot of people doing this, and it's basically just spam to everyone else. This post has been removed, but it can go back up if you change the name and reply to me.
@Sutairs that's fine now, thank you
@dawidsowa no problem, it's fine if it's just an accident. How fast have you managed to get this going?
@Sutairs mate, come on. I hate that I need to remove Honda posts but it's to prevent potential serious legal action against Jundroo. I know it sucks, but that's the way it is.
Couldn't agree more. Med is the man.
This post has been removed until the title is cleaned up. Reply to me when it has been sorted and I'll approve it
@ParadoxAircraft alright, no worries, just be more thoughtful in future, yeah?
@Mox @Dalton02 the original creator seems happy enough, so I'll leave it
@Flightsonic too real :|
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
Please do not upload things that you didn't make. Continuing to do so will result in a ban. Editing planes is fine, but you must make substantial changes and improvements to justify uploading it.
Yeah, I'm afraid that name change really isn't going to cut it. Reply to me once it's sorted and I'll approve the post again.
That plane is cool, I haven't seen that before. It seems like a pretty good idea if the technical challenges can be overcome, turnaround would be virtually zero.
My own choice is probably the Fanwing, which is similar to Anton Flettner's Magnus effect designs.