9,857 SkyJayTheFirst Comments

  • It's been a good ride. 2.7 years ago

    They had us in the first half, not gonna lie.

    Also, @AndrewGarrison thank you for making such a phenomenal game. It truly is worth every penny I spent on it, because I'm on it constantly. I play it on my phone, and it works so well!

    +10
  • Chengdu J-20 2.6 years ago

    Communist detected on American soil! Lethal force engaged!

    +9
  • How to use multiple custom screenshots (PC and mobile) [UPDATED] 2.9 years ago

    Really wish there weren't so many loopholes to go through to share custom images.

    +7
  • Petercopter 1.7 years ago

    I really hate Family Guy, but this meme is good :)

    +5
  • GAMF-02R Camille Pro [FT Remastered] 2.0 years ago

    @Yourlocalhuman sheesh, now I want a 3D printer.

    +5
  • F-16/79 Red Falcon 1.9 years ago

    COMMUNIST DETECTED ON AMERICAN SOIL! LETHAL FORCE ENGAGED!

    +4
  • Scientific detection equipment 2.3 years ago

    @ASBE bro, your hologram projectors just keep getting better and better. Would you be able to make a Radar-Warning-Receiver that points out incoming missiles?

    +4
  • 5th Generation Fighter Challenge [CLOSED] 2.4 years ago

    It's finally time for my Star Raven to shine.

    +4
  • Funky Trees! 2.4 years ago

    @WNP78 will you make a code in Funky Trees that allows things to focus on incoming hostile missiles? I wanna make a working Radar Warning Receiver.

    +4
  • PTA-03 BURUNG HANTU 10 months ago

    It looks like one of those weird looking frogs in that documentary meme.

    +3
  • Dassault Rafale C/F3R (100K Special) 11 months ago

    @MAPA Bonjoir, Misur Raptor!

    +3
  • PAK FA Sukhoi Su-57 Felon 1.5 years ago

    Ah, the city block of an aircraft that is the Su-57

    +3
  • F-35A Lightning ll 1.7 years ago

    Why no VTOL? Isn't that one of the main things the F-35 is known for? Or is it because the A variant has no VTOL ability? I thought all the F-35's did.

    +3
  • DARZ CONCORDE 1.7 years ago

    @DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL the nose be like, "Didn't I do it for you? Kermie!"

    +3
  • R3 T106 FA 1.7 years ago

    Ah, yes, the Italian cyber truck.

    +3
  • Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor remastered 1.8 years ago

    Ok, I love the Raptor just as much as the next guy, but this thing's acceleration and speed are far too unrealistic. No way can the Raptor reach Mach 2 in under 20 seconds, it just can't.

    +3
  • GPS (Functional) 1.8 years ago

    @IzzyIA can you make a version of this that doesn't require someone to activate 7 in order to scroll in and out? I would much rather prefer physical buttons in the cockpit.

    +3
  • HSTA-001 TAWONHITAM 1.8 years ago

    Ok, who turned the R3 into a helicopter?!

    +3
  • Northrop P-61 Black Widow 1.9 years ago

    Wish I could spotlight this.

    +3
  • 5th Generation Fighter Challenge [CLOSED] 2.1 years ago

    @tarikGR ayy, so what's the verdict on the submissions?

    +3
  • F-44-B7 Star Raven (For 5th Gen Challenge) 2.4 years ago

    @tarikGR here's my entry for your 5th gen fighter challenge!

    +3
  • B-29 SuperFortress 2.7 years ago

    So that's why it's getting very little attention. You blatantly took this plane from someone else's work.

    +3
  • CF-7X Denouncer 2.9 years ago

    @HorizonHitingxt I find it terrible that not even a quarter of the people who downloaded this didn't even consider upvoting it. This is an amazingly well done aircraft.

    +3
  • P-47-D "Thunderbolt" one month ago

    @WritersCrusadersAirCo2 just wanted to say your pinup looks real nice!

    +2
  • FA-51 Nemesis 3 months ago

    @Otana wait, I thought you abandoned this project! And weren't you gonna name this "Ryu Taka"?

    +2
  • SWL-120 Engine Sounds 4 months ago

    Anyone else think the engine at full throttle sounds like the Thunderscreech in its recording?

    +2
  • [CLOSED] Name = Part Count Challenge 8 months ago

    @BadahhMuscleCar001 don't know what would be more difficult: making an F4 Phantom using only 4 parts, or making a Mirage 4000 with 4000 parts.

    +2
  • F4X-B Archangel 10 months ago

    @Shimamurahougetsu
    @42
    @VeroViper
    *
    Thank you all for upvoting this! But there's a magnifying glass thingy, too! ;)
    *
    Don't spotlight! (Do it, you know you wanna do it! Lock it! Lock onto that magnifying glass button!) Ahh, missile memes.

    +2
  • F4X-B Archangel 10 months ago

    @50CalChicken
    @IceCraftGaming
    @TTL

    +2
  • F4X-B Archangel: Freebird Solo Teaser 10 months ago

    @F8boa
    @DatTrainGuy19
    @Majakalona

    +2
  • IA 3D Renderer V4.0 Stress Test - 500 Points 11 months ago

    It's always either you or @ASBE doing crazy things with funky trees. Not sure how either of you have the patience for it.

    +2
  • Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II (Stealth working) 1.1 years ago

    While it indeed does avoid detection from Ice Base missiles, it doesn't avoid missile detection in the SAM Evasion challenge.

    +2
  • A walking chainsaw! 1.1 years ago

    @tigercorn chainsaw man? I dunno, I don't watch new anime shows.

    +2
  • RAH-66 Comanche 1.2 years ago

    @realSavageMan really beautiful design. I'll bet if I had as many points as you though, my Stormhawk would've also reached front page on SP.

    +2
  • Funky Trees! 1.3 years ago

    @ToeTips it's all good. I'm no expert, but I know a thing or 2.

    +2
  • [FINAL TEASER] F-35B Lightning II -Burn- 1.4 years ago

    @GuyFolk ho ri sheet this is awesome!
    *
    However, I have a challenge for you...
    *
    As far as I can tell, there is not a single build on your profile that is completely original, such as my StormHawk. I challenge you...
    *
    To build a stealth fighter completely from scratch, using absolutely nothing but your imagination. I wanna see something of yours that is truly original. A jet fighter that doesn't exist anywhere, whether in real life, or in Ace Combat, or in Yukikaze.
    *
    Don't have much to give, but you think you're up for the challenge?

    +2
  • Funky Trees! 1.4 years ago

    @ToeTips the format you want is as follows: condition ? value if true : value if false
    *
    For example: let's say I set something to do a thing when I activate 1. Therefore, I would put: Activate1 ? 1 : 0

    +2
  • F1X-A StormHawk Coming This Saturday! 1.5 years ago

    @BeastHunter @Robomo119DerMustangKiller @Shimamurahougetsu

    +2
  • J-20A 1.7 years ago

    Everyone gangsta til the plastic melts off the engines upon takeoff.

    +2
  • Lockheed YF-22 1.7 years ago

    Well done. Only issues are:
    *
    1: your missile bay opens when you activate 2 instead of 3, whereas the missiles arm at activate 3.
    *
    2: Although it increases maneuverability, activate 1 doesn't allow it to post-stall maneuver, which is what supermaneuverability is.
    *
    3: This aircraft lacks afterburners.

    +2
  • Sweapstreak Peregrine F.2 1.7 years ago

    @UnmanagedReservoir just you wait; soon I'll have gold with a fighter that'll look so beautiful inside and out, that it may even surpass the upvotes you have on this!
    *
    Also, you get my upvote for sure.

    +2
  • Mf-102A Frühlingsschnee 1.8 years ago

    This needs fixing. First off, at high speeds, due to its pitch rate in the canards, elevators and engines, it likes to shake itself like crazy. Also, you need to disable aircraft collisions for some of your parts in the engine bay. That, and this thing's engine power seems way too strong. I'd recommend decreasing its power output while cutting down the drag on some of your parts, if you haven't already.
    *
    Apart from that, you get an upvote.

    +2
  • NF-15A VIGILANTE 1.8 years ago

    Very beautiful build indeed, but if I may suggest a couple things...

    1: The center of mass is WAY too far from the center of lift. I would recommend putting them much closer to each other, as that'll increase this aircraft's controllability.

    2: You're missing some variables that go to the search scanner on the right side of the cockpit. Look at @Leehopard 's FC-912-C to find those variables.

    3: If you want better control over your aircraft, rather than using thrust nozzles, I'd recommend putting in more fancy controls into your thrust vectoring. Try combining pitch controls with roll in the engines.

    That's all I got for now. Other than that, you get an upvote.

    +2
  • X-FA 8 Wandering Phantom 1.8 years ago

    @KaiYarushi did you design the cockpit yourself? If so, dayum, you're better than me at designing futuristic cockpits!

    +2
  • F-64-B Crowhawk 1.9 years ago

    @IceCraftGaming thanks

    +2
  • F-64-B Crowhawk 1.9 years ago

    @Farewellntchii @Panzerwaifu69 @HorizonHitingxt

    +2
  • F-64-B Crowhawk 1.9 years ago

    @IceCraftGaming @Otana @Souplane

    +2
  • Hover SPAAG 1.9 years ago

    We already have hover SPAA's, and they're called helicopters!

    Nice build, tho.

    +2
  • DARZ F30X 1.9 years ago

    @DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL dang, those look so nice. I might have to keep you in mind if I want to make a thumbnail for any of my future builds.

    +2
  • DARZ F30X 1.9 years ago

    @DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL did you take these screenshots yourself?

    Edit: Nevermind, I see you made the paintings. Nice.

    +2