50.4k Stingray Comments

  • Stock Weapons Cessna 150 - for Simple Fighter Challenge 5.8 years ago

    Thanks, although winning was not the main goal here, assumes you use AI dogfight and AI Oceanview to test, because the results could surprise even a veteran like yourself. The build is new for your contest; in AI dogfight it’s a match for most of my jet fighter builds. On Oceanview the run time is about 50 seconds, kinda slow. @hopotumon

  • EH Project - ISD 5.8 years ago

    Could be medium physics on my iPad. Don’t sweat it. The link I sent you was a competition winner for Doomsday air/space ships, which I also built on medium physics on an iPad. Just fyi. @Mickk

  • Stock Weapons Cessna 150 - for Simple Fighter Challenge 5.8 years ago

    Thanks @SodiumChloride

  • EH Project - ISD 5.8 years ago

    This thing blows up shortly after launch. Counter proposal: Use one of the very few working battlecruisers so far posted on SP. (Yes, it uses vtol for launch, has weapons and warp speed)
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/nLpW23/USS-Sword-of-Damocles

  • Simple Fighter Challenge (Closed) 5.8 years ago

    Comment. Too bad about the 50 part limit. My unposted most competitive propeller fighter+Speedway build is 70 parts. Ergo, not gonna see it here. Maybe on another challenge. BTW, I often use engines that were modified (xml or nudged) from public “feel free to use” SP posts. I cannot use fine tuner on iOS, yet integrated parts work well. A gray area of your general rules.

    +2
  • AT-2 5.8 years ago

    A flying wing V1.0 ; I like simple.

  • Simple Fighter Challenge (Closed) 5.8 years ago

    See update comment please, @hopotumon

    +1
  • Simple Fighter Challenge (Closed) 5.8 years ago

    @hopotumon The primary concerns/ comments I’m receiving on this valid challenge regard features of Jundroo (nudging) that work on all platforms and other features (fine tuner) that are tailored to a specific user. Request you update the General Rules. If you desire competitive entries.

    +1
  • Simple Fighter Challenge (Closed) 5.8 years ago

    50 % of my builds use nudged construction, via iOS. They had better be allowed, since @hopotumon cannot run an xml scan on standard nudged parts. Just a hint. @marcox43

  • Simple Fighter Challenge (Closed) 5.8 years ago

    IMHO, countermeasure "icon" pod causes more damage than good. Opionion, only. However: explain 1-layer wings to newbies. One Q: can I use my menu "infernos" or "Guardians" that are slightly modded as subassembly items?

    +1
  • General Aviation Challenge [CLOSED] 5.8 years ago

    Thanks

    Clarification appreciated. @EternalDarkness

  • General Aviation Challenge [CLOSED] 5.8 years ago

    Is this challenge to show off fancy camera views within the cabin, or does pilot + cabin view suffice?

  • Killer Stealth (VTOL) 5.8 years ago

    I’ve done that 3 years ago. Handling was lousy, time for a re-design for Klingon birds. @JediWolf

  • USS Sword of Damocles 5.8 years ago

    Thank you! @JediWolf

  • Killer Stealth (VTOL) 5.8 years ago

    Thanks @Gameboy21

  • Boeing 747-100 City of Everett 5.8 years ago

    Yes, I discovered by trial and error. @Vidal99977

  • Boeing 747-100 City of Everett 5.9 years ago

    Request you add wheels up protocol for all users.

  • Tsunami 5.9 years ago

    I submitted other entries. @Legal

  • SST CHALLANGE (Closed) 5.9 years ago

    Thank you.

  • O-Ringer 5.9 years ago

    Sleek, slick!

  • Tsunami 5.9 years ago

    Thanks @Legal

  • Steam Mandate 5.9 years ago

    Yeah, thanks for the heads up! @RailfanEthan

  • Dauntless 5.9 years ago

    Guess that was only me, using medium physics on iOS. In any case, an upgrade could include more speed+maneuvering via usind roll=rudder steer for iOS users (who do not evet use yaw). @bang091

  • Concorde v4 5.9 years ago

    Easily. Try --
    https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/k89J3v/SST-CHALLANGE

  • Does anyone even remember me? 5.9 years ago

    You build advanced concepts. Wish you were still posting.

  • C-130 SAS DROP-TRANSPORT CHALLENGE 5.9 years ago

    OK.This is clearly a "flashy airplane" challenge, so I doubt I'll be entering. FYI I just landed my protototype cargo lander, TWICE, with fearless Jarhead Marine figurines to the bottom base of the Krakabola Volcano. I saved the location. I wish Jundroo would allow sharing of compatible starting points for launch: sea, land, and snow with other SP community members. @TMach5

  • C-130 SAS DROP-TRANSPORT CHALLENGE 5.9 years ago

    Congrats hope you win! @TMach5

  • Ship hulls 5.9 years ago

    Long credit overdue for other’s builds. Gotta try these sometime myself.

  • C-130 SAS DROP-TRANSPORT CHALLENGE 5.9 years ago

    Nice troop deployment trick, great build!

  • Biggest bomb ever on a plane 5.9 years ago

    Bigger Jundroo bombs do not BOOM any bigger.

  • Dauntless 5.9 years ago

    Tested: too much mirroring. Build explodes upon any launch site. Recommend start from scratch, avoid mirroring. Good luck!

  • SST CHALLANGE!!!! 5.9 years ago

    Based loosely on the Lockheed L-2000 mockup, never flown. This is a slow Mach 3 build, cause it simply handles with more ease than my Mach 7 builds. Hope you save, and enjoy! @Vidal99977

  • SST CHALLANGE!!!! 5.9 years ago

    Thanks @QingyuZhou

  • SST CHALLANGE!!!! 5.9 years ago

    Thanks @PlanesAndThings2

  • SST CHALLANGE!!!! 5.9 years ago

    Thanks @hopotumon

  • SST CHALLANGE!!!! 5.9 years ago

    Thanks @SledDriver

  • SST CHALLANGE!!!! 5.9 years ago

    Thanks @Feanor

  • SST CHALLANGE!!!! 5.9 years ago

    Thanks @NFIGMT

  • Tsunami 5.9 years ago

    @DORIANCVS Thank you!

  • Tsunami 5.9 years ago

    Thank you @SimpleEric

  • Tsunami 5.9 years ago

    Thanks, that’s realistic. I usually proceed to Snowstone Island just to destroy the dual missile battery, then fly back to Murphy or Wright, @SimpleEric

  • raft 5.9 years ago

    Cute, below 20 mph. Could you add a "Wilson" basketball to the raft?

    +1
  • J-79 5.9 years ago

    NP. Don’t forget to eventually add an afterburner. @Fishy26

  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 5.9 years ago

    I meant to tag you on my comment to your question on a comment to ChickenMcNuggets007 @flyingsteve88

  • B-2 Spirit Bomber AV-11 - Northrop Grumman 5.9 years ago

    That’s a negative @ChickenMcNuggets007 Background substitutions are a dead giveaway that a PC builder posted the build. My Steam account on OSX has many stores and alternative games. Which do not always work on a desktop Mac. The new release of Jundroo SR2 on Steam is a case in point: without PC mouse left click and PC mouse right click a user simply cannot build a space model. Yeah, I performed hours of Beta testing and my comments fell on deaf ears.

    +1
  • J-79 5.9 years ago

    Here’s another upvote from someone who knows first hand what a J-79 engine is. Very detailed and difficult build!

    +3
  • [CLOSED] Watercraft Challenge 5.9 years ago

    OK, I'll wait for another month prior to removing several of my posts, will probably will include the ones mentioned and other posts. Judge either version of Visby Corvette. Basically, my posts are being copied rather than being upvoted, so I do basic housecleaning of public posts about once a year. @Fluffiboo

  • Tsunami 5.9 years ago

    Funny. Thanks for reminding me about Jundroo SP limitations. I’ve posted builds that handle 100,000 ft thru 200,000 ft via Jundroo SP software quite well. Nobody was interested in those builds. They lacked flashy insignia. They used VTOL powered reaction thrusters efecttivly. Control above 100,000 ft on SP is possible and accomplished. Very socially incorrect to discuss, however, since we are all supposed to be using Steam and SR2. I guess.. @Spectre2520

  • Tsunami 5.9 years ago

    Thank you @Fluffiboo

  • Watercraft Challenge Re-Post one 5.9 years ago

    Thank you @Fluffiboo