@rickofrolls "However, if your variation does not offer any improvements over the existing airplane, then it may be removed."
and all you did was add a single part
"it was designed to give carrier air wings something modern, reliable, and versatile without relying entirely on the more expensive F-35C fleet." the F-15SE promised the same and ended up being more maintenance heavy and more expensive than the F-35 lol. it wouldnt be cheaper than the F-35C if the entire airframe gets redesigned and implements ram. the navy doesnt want more rhinos since it is really really really draggy, thats the whole reason why the FA-XX exist.
@CarGuy32SP cuz its mine, made for this dork
+1hope theres an alternative configuration in the F-15E where it has the CFTs
Air India flight 171 was not shot down
i am once again here with you for you to make a chinese tank
someone must have be holding RD at gunpoint cuz suddenly he adds folding wings to a naval fighter
+4your launch bar is in the wrong place. this is the correct position
+1@WinsWings also dunno why you added the pics of the F-47 and B-21, those are 6th gen aircraft.
@SumateraIndustries cmon its easy, i even did one myself
+1now do the F
disappointed that you used AI for the thumbnail because you can draw really good
+1lets be serious, do you really want a plane with engines that eat itself with no gun and suboptimal missiles?
+1welcome back T-80BVM turret
@SupremeDorian
@rickofrolls its literally 1 part, it is not an improvement.
@rickofrolls it is? moderators literally remove posts like these
@rickofrolls dont even try bringing up the rules, i know that like its the back of my hand.
@rickofrolls "However, if your variation does not offer any improvements over the existing airplane, then it may be removed."
and all you did was add a single part
@rickofrolls are you gonna remove it or what
@rickofrolls adding 1 part to a build and uploading it is against the rules
you posting this is in of itself, cringe
+5@SumateraIndustries thats the legacy hornet, not the super hornet
super hornets dont carry double racks/double amraams on the outer wing pylons
britain's most abysmally dogshit MBT
+2great way to dox yourself
@Adhil0312 im not stupid
@Adhil0312 you're using guyfolk's SU-57
incredible, mcdonnell douglas' new stealth technology that makes an F-15 look like an F/A-18
+1@LunarEclipseSP hold on maybe im wrong because it looks exactly like this build
+1this is not your build
+1the rear landing gear🥀
+1is it updated?
+1@ReinMcDeer what if, all models of the F-35
+2why would there be color on a cloud of metal?
also umm the countermeasures are in the wrong side btw
HOLY SHIT
@dekanii i guess thats a no? :(
can you make like a ztz-99 pweash it would totes be cool
+1front landing gear feels a bit too short, and the A-4 is known for its comically tall landing gear
+1"it was designed to give carrier air wings something modern, reliable, and versatile without relying entirely on the more expensive F-35C fleet." the F-15SE promised the same and ended up being more maintenance heavy and more expensive than the F-35 lol. it wouldnt be cheaper than the F-35C if the entire airframe gets redesigned and implements ram. the navy doesnt want more rhinos since it is really really really draggy, thats the whole reason why the FA-XX exist.
+1this is the forums, not the youtube community tab
+3the plane looks like it was bitten by mosquitoes
+4now do the ZTZ-99
@aeroplanefan possibly?
this is a forum, not twitter, nor facebook, nor discord.
+2can it play soccer?
@crazyplaness so the SP logo?
@WilosIndomie you're such a cornball, we know you really meant to upload a 9/11 post
+1SP players dont post something that aint too off-topic challenge (impossible!!!)
+6why do SP people post literally anything but aviation or the game itself
+3@Whills may i take the cockpit label displays? (with credits ofc)