@Faust1001 i am studying engineering and i have done some research is the F-22 or F-35 design will be used as a basis for a 5th gen fighter because the designs are successful ones
@JPplays okay first, the AIM-9 will only activate if you actually look at the target directly because of the HMDS, and some switches are pure cosmetics only.
@Bilderman doubt that base on your last reply because you said "to catch up and be able to have a stand in a dogfight (I mean F-22 vs F-4) we can assume that the better plane will win the dogfight vtol."
if you did make papers about the F-22 then you wouldnr make such grammatical errors, and no one dogfights in VTOL.
@Bilderman vtol is not required in 5th gen and all stealth fighters look exactly like the F-22 is because its the most successful shape, allies or enemies of america will use the F-22 as a reference.
@PrussianAirlines so let me ask you this also, if you were developing an 5th gen fighter, what do you think would it look like? thats right, it will look like america's stealth fighters, wanna know why? because of STEALTH.
@TylerWildDog no one will, i recommend deleting your account if you have nothing to do than just say "I HATE MINORITIES BECAUSE A TWINK HURT MY FEELINGS"
@LoganAviation >posted only a block which counts as spam >plans to repost the block which is also spam
pffft idk you ask me, its almost like i havent been her for 3 years
@TylerWildDog no one is gonna complain about the prices being higher because your shit aint DCS level of fidelity anyways, you are just violating rules by monetizing models.
@Faust1001 i am studying engineering and i have done some research is the F-22 or F-35 design will be used as a basis for a 5th gen fighter because the designs are successful ones
+1@KevincastleSP if you knew from the start then you shouldn't upload stuff like this, shit is too off topic
waiting for the day you actually use a blueprint
+1you don't have to constantly remind us that you are not uploading, this is a forum, not your YouTube channel.
you never gained popularity in the first place
+2man re-invented the Mirage F1
+5@SPsidearm you could have literally just grabbed an AIM-120 since it has a range of more than 100km compared to the Barak 1 which is only 12km
wouldn't it be better if you just said you will make a Korean Air 747-300?
+2you just ripped the SAM from the missile launchers of the destroyers off
@JPplays okay first, the AIM-9 will only activate if you actually look at the target directly because of the HMDS, and some switches are pure cosmetics only.
@SPsidearm sure
@Diego76095 be greatful
+1israel happened
+3this is totally a Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II
@deaner me when I lie
all you did was just slap on a text image
+1lil bro, you aint suppose to be in this website
me when ctrl+c ctrl+v
+1finally, you didnt use the mock up SU-75
+1@ManfredVonRichthofen didnt know epstein was still alive
@Bilderman doubt that base on your last reply because you said "to catch up and be able to have a stand in a dogfight (I mean F-22 vs F-4) we can assume that the better plane will win the dogfight vtol."
if you did make papers about the F-22 then you wouldnr make such grammatical errors, and no one dogfights in VTOL.
@Bilderman uh huh? that doesnt mean anything though
philippines is cooked
+1you could have done the SU-33UB which is a TVC, tandem seat version of the SU-33
+1@Bilderman you really do not know what classifies as 5th gen
@PrussianAirlines you do not know what classifies as 5th gen
@Bilderman vtol is not required in 5th gen and all stealth fighters look exactly like the F-22 is because its the most successful shape, allies or enemies of america will use the F-22 as a reference.
flankers uses flaperons tho
@PrussianAirlines so let me ask you this also, if you were developing an 5th gen fighter, what do you think would it look like? thats right, it will look like america's stealth fighters, wanna know why? because of STEALTH.
@Bilderman let me ask you this, what do you think a 5th gen fighter would look like?
notice how im not here
@IonizedNutria okay but you are violating rules
the J-15/SU-33 has a different tail boom from the other flankers
+1@Noname918181818181818181
@LunarEclipseSP nah we call her "Slim Lim"
+1missed opportunity of naming it "Fritter"
+3also it can carry 6 PL-15E (folding fins variant) internally
btw if you didnt know already, the later prototype of the J-35A has hinge horizontal stabilisers like found on the flankers.
didnt the flanker proto had that weird airbrake/landing gear door hybrid?
@TylerWildDog no one will, i recommend deleting your account if you have nothing to do than just say "I HATE MINORITIES BECAUSE A TWINK HURT MY FEELINGS"
ah, its prototype number 1 in the airshow
its the protype that doesnt use the hinge type horizontal stabs like on the flankers
@LoganAviation turn your screen
@LoganAviation
>posted only a block which counts as spam>plans to repost the block which is also spampffft idk you ask me, its almost like i havent been her for 3 years
@TylerWildDog no one is gonna complain about the prices being higher because your shit aint DCS level of fidelity anyways, you are just violating rules by monetizing models.
imma enter kek
+1@crazyplaness
@Firecharge123 hmmm yes i like breaking rules
@LoganAviation so you're not gonna follow rules because "haha gyuz itz juzt a joke guyz pleaze laugh"
"why cant i post a penis in SP? its suppose to be a joke, theres no harm being done"
@LoganAviation the joke wasnt even funny, move on already