@Eagleman101SP I actually messed up one detail. MH-60 is the designation for the US Navy's Blackhawk variant. I'm not sure why I thought it was the designation for the Army's MEDEVAC bird. Probably lack of sleep lol You'd think I would have remembered having worked on them IRL. 🤦🏻♂️
I love that you included functioning tail rotor blades instead of the typical "always on" tail rotor.
Couple of pointers: 1. The main landing gear should be set outside of the body. 2: MLG should be forward more of the crew window(between crew window and pilot door.) 3. Tail wheel should be forward a bit more(before the tail rotor pylon.) 4. MH-60 is a MEDEVAC airframe and wouldn't be armed(legally anyway lol)
Overall, fantastic job. I love the functionality of the main rotor and tail rotor blades(blade pitching accurately.)
@Eagleman101SP I actually messed up one detail. MH-60 is the designation for the US Navy's Blackhawk variant. I'm not sure why I thought it was the designation for the Army's MEDEVAC bird. Probably lack of sleep lol You'd think I would have remembered having worked on them IRL. 🤦🏻♂️
+1I love that you included functioning tail rotor blades instead of the typical "always on" tail rotor.
Couple of pointers: 1. The main landing gear should be set outside of the body. 2: MLG should be forward more of the crew window(between crew window and pilot door.) 3. Tail wheel should be forward a bit more(before the tail rotor pylon.) 4. MH-60 is a MEDEVAC airframe and wouldn't be armed(legally anyway lol)
Overall, fantastic job. I love the functionality of the main rotor and tail rotor blades(blade pitching accurately.)
+1@Michiko Seriously? The text on the back of this thing.
+1Garbage
Edgy kids posting BS 🙄