Hey, I see you used my Yak-27 and F/A-18E! Nice!
Also, the Yak-27 not a real Russian plane, but an original design. The thing you broke at the beginning was one of the props for the contra-rotating pusher assembly at the end. However, you flew it just fine, even with flaps on the whole time (Which was the main source of your problems lmao).
As for the F/A-18E, that was made when I didn't quite know what I was doing with rotators, so the inputs can be a bit much when trying to fly it. I also forgot to invert the trim on one wing before I uploaded it, so add another issue into that.
Just a note for future aircraft, you should put the cockpit back inside of the plane. The camera can still see through some of the parts, as it doesn't have textures inside (unless talking about hollow fuselages). However, this plane is really nice, so you get an upvote for the effort put into the plane.
@Bacondoggie You know, you can fly the non-meme build on high physics on your phone, right? I'm not even kidding.
And tbh, as long as the speed is low it's actually very useful! So congrats to you for that!
@DickBrazen Off topic, but okay. Wear some gloves.
As for the question at hand, I think enough people have said that that action speaks more words than actually commenting.
@Bacondoggie There is throttle, but no engines. It uses rotators and wings to propel it forward. You should just use throttle to go forward and brake to go backwards. It takes a while to get up to speed.
Listen. You’re a good lad. Just don’t be too over the top, and you’ll do fine.
That wing flex tho.
The best caw to dwive OwO
When Germany gets even more desperate.
This tank is very sexy tho
@WrecklessRacer02 It’s the least we could do, my friend. I hope you get better, depression is not a pretty ordeal.
I know @LeonardoEngineering figured something out for his stuff.
@FairFireFight Well, yes. Problem is they often they don't, and people have to be tagged on it if they showed interest in the project.
Foxy
I never thought of it as a biplane. Very cool!
@MrPorg137 That’s the name of the song...
Meanwhile I sit here, two months in, refurbishing my Alicorn
@MrPorg137 Taps?
@MrPorg137 Just take a Screenshot and crop it. That’s what I do
@Zanedavid So far, there's new funky trees inputs, as well as tracers for shells. That's what I've deduced so far.
I think that should cover it lol
@Vidal99977 I wish this wasn’t so true.
@Ghost8831 I think yours is arguably better, my friend! The detail on it is simply fantastic! But thank you for the compliment!
@ThisIsMyCreativeUsername None, I just have the beta
@Shnippy Lol, good one
@Warbirdnation Yup! Testing rn, and the issue with guns is no more!
@Braynie0904 okay, answer me this, heretical person.
To be, or not to be?
@AZAMGAMING Well, that’s good to hear!
@USSR no problem, comrade!
@TheKraken3 Basically.
@TheKraken3 As in it doesn’t actually work anymore as an airfoil, and can’t move the plane. For example, full up trim and full up pitch
@Bacondoggie Stay tuned, I might make more
Hey, I see you used my Yak-27 and F/A-18E! Nice!
Also, the Yak-27 not a real Russian plane, but an original design. The thing you broke at the beginning was one of the props for the contra-rotating pusher assembly at the end. However, you flew it just fine, even with flaps on the whole time (Which was the main source of your problems lmao).
As for the F/A-18E, that was made when I didn't quite know what I was doing with rotators, so the inputs can be a bit much when trying to fly it. I also forgot to invert the trim on one wing before I uploaded it, so add another issue into that.
Just a note for future aircraft, you should put the cockpit back inside of the plane. The camera can still see through some of the parts, as it doesn't have textures inside (unless talking about hollow fuselages). However, this plane is really nice, so you get an upvote for the effort put into the plane.
@Bacondoggie You know, you can fly the non-meme build on high physics on your phone, right? I'm not even kidding.
And tbh, as long as the speed is low it's actually very useful! So congrats to you for that!
@SemedianIndustries You’re very welcome, bruva!
@Notaleopard Friten = frighten
I am a F R I T E N
@Notaleopard You could also use mine, I made it as well.
His face would also be one of joy, as the railguns tear it to shreds.
@DickBrazen Off topic, but okay. Wear some gloves.
As for the question at hand, I think enough people have said that that action speaks more words than actually commenting.
A little build-breaking, but still a good idea.
@Bacondoggie There is throttle, but no engines. It uses rotators and wings to propel it forward. You should just use throttle to go forward and brake to go backwards. It takes a while to get up to speed.
@Natedog120705 Again, that's an XML code thing, accessible by designerSuite. Check here for codes to do so
@Natedog120705 It’s a modified cannon, with a velocity of about ~5500mph, however velocity is measured in m/s.
@Natedog120705 The names? It’s just an XML code change. Check the weapon’s name in designerSuite
Yes.
You should make a KV-2 with the 152mm BL-10. Make Mother Russia proud!
"Not that detailed"
Sorry, but I don't believe that. This ship is great!
@AZAMGAMING Oh, thank you!
Negative, I'm afraid of sharks!
@Mattangi2 LMAO
@Mattangi2 Nope, you were right, actually. I was thinking of the 103R.
Hey wait, wasn't the Fiesler the manned version?
@KerlonceauxIndustries Submersible Aviation Cruiser best aviation carrier
You can just upload pictures of this build in a teaser post in forums. Uploading a whole build doesn't do much to it.
Morning, GMT-6