@JacobHardy64 Simple spamming wouldn't be the main issue anyways, and well, just avoiding trolls shouldn't be too hard (what is the chance of them even reaching silver before grtting banned?). Having a mod verify ebery single case of this would be very timeconsuming, and a lot of pretty useless extra work, IMO.
Let's say someone copies a plane. Then, someone notices it (and for whatever reason doesn't report it), and comments about it being a copy. Now, if this would be implemented, that comment could simply be removed. I think that this would work fine, as long as both users had to accept the comment being removed, using some sort of setting for it.
@Wahoo12 IIRC E-75 Flakpanzer is made up? Not that it really matters, but I'd rather not do the E-75. E-100, E-50 and E-10 are very likely on the other hand.
@Himynameiswalrus Well, you weren't really able to do it justice because of not being able to use XML edit or nudge, but, having that in mind, it's decent. Oh, and also, I know I'm being annoying, but it's the PanzerkampfwagEn.
A caliber-slider for wingguns (please, make them attachable to all objoects) would do fine here, I think, for the sound. Then you could set reload, shell velocity and shell weight wwith sliders, so we don't need to XML edit as much.
The American month/day/year system makes no sense, it's like someone tried to make it as weird as possible, but hey, all ways are good except the bad ones, I guess.
I think it would be near impossible to make them rotate. But no, I'm not kidding you. This is the way my Cromwell is going to look when completed. @Flightsonic
@HkZeyco Alright. I have a strategy that sometimes work, put a wing (structural wing or structural panel) behind the nosecone (after removing nose) and then attach desired number of guns, and after that, reattach nose.
@JacobHardy64 Simple spamming wouldn't be the main issue anyways, and well, just avoiding trolls shouldn't be too hard (what is the chance of them even reaching silver before grtting banned?). Having a mod verify ebery single case of this would be very timeconsuming, and a lot of pretty useless extra work, IMO.
Let's say someone copies a plane. Then, someone notices it (and for whatever reason doesn't report it), and comments about it being a copy. Now, if this would be implemented, that comment could simply be removed. I think that this would work fine, as long as both users had to accept the comment being removed, using some sort of setting for it.
@KCferrari Thanks for the tip, will try.
@KCferrari Yeah, I'm experimenting with that right now. The problem I'm getting is that the pitching flaps are insufficient.
@KCferrari Alright, do you think I can get away by simply nudging additional wings into the existing ones? I don't want to ruin the way it looks.
@TehDuck Greatly appreciated!
@Hadesrocksz Thanks! This is just way too good looking (by my standards) for me to give it up easily :)
@Delphirier Well, I could make it, but I don't really feel like building it (or the E-75).
@Wahoo12 IIRC E-75 Flakpanzer is made up? Not that it really matters, but I'd rather not do the E-75. E-100, E-50 and E-10 are very likely on the other hand.
@TehDuck Would probably be a good idea, since I could use the hull twice, and potentially reuse on of the turrets for the Maus.
@Himynameiswalrus Well, you weren't really able to do it justice because of not being able to use XML edit or nudge, but, having that in mind, it's decent. Oh, and also, I know I'm being annoying, but it's the PanzerkampfwagEn.
Good job. But, it's the Pz VIII, Pz VII was the Löwe.
A caliber-slider for wingguns (please, make them attachable to all objoects) would do fine here, I think, for the sound. Then you could set reload, shell velocity and shell weight wwith sliders, so we don't need to XML edit as much.
Yes please!
The American month/day/year system makes no sense, it's like someone tried to make it as weird as possible, but hey, all ways are good except the bad ones, I guess.
@ValtsuAircraftIndustries "! [] ( link ) " But without the spaces between the ] and (.
@Himynameiswalrus Take a close look at my StuG III G and compare it to this...
@Nickasaurus Thanks, do not expect this anytime soon though, doing the whole tracks in one session would be so insanely annoying.
Are all "your" creations copies?
I think it would be near impossible to make them rotate. But no, I'm not kidding you. This is the way my Cromwell is going to look when completed. @Flightsonic
First time one of my planes have gotten copied. I hope you understand why I report you?
Last week had ridiculous ammounts of Draken and Su-29.
@Lalalalalalalal Alright
I feel like this has been posted before? Same user, who removed it, perhaps?
@Hadesrocksz Nice :)
@TehDuck Same with my StuG. Thanks :)
@AlphaOneIndustries Sure, but not very soon I think. Next project is very likely going to be IS-2/ISU-152.
@ChazPlayzGamez No problem.
@BRuthless Nah will probably do a replica of something, G7a or Long Lance probably.
@deusalgor Yeah, I forgot that, thanks for pointing it out. Will edit the post at the proper place.
Cool, I'll try to make something for this!
@Halfstrike I know but, I've already found a good way to do that. Look at my StuG III G which was done without XML, and you'll see that I succeeded :)
@MaleticAirplanes Thanks :)
@MaleticAirplanes Hopefully :) Depends on how many I can build next week, and if I can maintain the quality of the Cromwell.
@deusalgor @TehDuck @DestinyAviation Do you agree?
Nice! I'm hoping to reach 5k this week.
@Cedy117 Thanks, yes, it's a nice tank. Honestly though, it isn't my favourite T6 medium, that would be the A-43, aka T-34M.
@Seeras No problem.
@burgergaming Unless it gets all too time consuming, I'll have 4 parts between each track-link.
It's an MG, and another MG, does it really matter?
@TheMasterSoldier Thanks :)
Agree 100%
@Lypero No problem, it's a really nice creation.
@DestinyAviation Ok.
@HkZeyco No problem
It can actually be flown backwards with AG3, unless you removed the VTOL engines :)
Really nice, but you can barely see what it is from the first photo, I think that's why noone saw it earlier.
@HkZeyco Alright. I have a strategy that sometimes work, put a wing (structural wing or structural panel) behind the nosecone (after removing nose) and then attach desired number of guns, and after that, reattach nose.
It looks epic!
@DestinyAviation No problem, I can't wait to see yours, or my own finished :p