19.2k Waemoth Comments

  • Help Needed 8.6 years ago

    @AviownCorp Obviously.

  • Help Needed 8.6 years ago

    @AviownCorp I already have a rudder
    It just doesn't do much at all

  • Help Needed 8.6 years ago

    @aseder Yeah :/

  • Type 10 Assault Gun (Thanks for 10k) 8.6 years ago

    @zackattack316 Yes it does.

  • Type 10 Assault Gun (Thanks for 10k) 8.6 years ago

    @Solarisaircraft Lol :)

  • Type 10 Assault Gun (Thanks for 10k) 8.6 years ago

    @Upquark @General360 @bjac0 Thanks!

  • Royal Ordnance L11A5 8.6 years ago

    @Luke92778 I don't think so?

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @Flakmagnet Yeah, it's pretty :)

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @FlOu Yeah, my PC started to get slower and slower to load it, lol.

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @FlOu Thanks, but to be honest I had to cut down on the in order to not make the part count go crazy. I wanted to have grilles for an example.

  • STEALTH HAWK TEASER!! 8.6 years ago

    @AviownCorp No problem, it looks cool.

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @bjac0 As I've stated, the point of having that in the title was not to get more points. It was just a happy remark, just like gold, silver or platinum-build. Now, I do however realize that others take it differently, and I have thus removed it.

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @bjac0 Not asking anyone to upvote it by any means. I just assumed that this would get the required points (Teaser got 15 upvotes). I guess we just think of the word differently, but I do see your point.

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @Flash0of0green Glad you like it :)

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @bjac0 I just don't really see the difference between this and making forum posts that promotes your builds, something which we both have done.

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @bjac0 I've just worked on it for such a long time that I really wanted to get it over with, and I just wrote that, I've removed it now.

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @General360 Yes please, it took me like 9 hours to build it.

  • Type 10 Heavy Tank 8.6 years ago

    @BritishNarwhal Congratulations on gold man!

  • Heinkel P.1077 Julia 8.6 years ago

    @Seeras Epic!

  • Messerschmitt Me. 266-C3 Eisvogel 8.6 years ago

    @Seeras Julia.

  • Messerschmitt Me. 266-C3 Eisvogel 8.6 years ago

    @Seeras Have you ever considered building a He P.1077?

  • Messerschmitt Me. 266-C3 Eisvogel 8.6 years ago

    Good job!

  • O-II 150 Teaser II 8.6 years ago

    @Solarisaircraft It's my first tank that really feels like a tank, it looks massive ;)

  • O-II 150 Teaser II 8.6 years ago

    @TehDuck Thanks :)

  • e 100 8.6 years ago

    Really good, and I highly recommend using PC and XML editing, if you do that you can get great results.

  • SAAB JAS-39C 'Gripen' 8.6 years ago

    I think that this deserves a feature!

  • O-II 150 Teaser II 8.6 years ago

    @Earthbenderrwefa No, this is far bigger. The Tiger II was my main inspiration, though.

  • O-II 150 Teaser II 8.6 years ago

    @DeezDucks Thanks :P

  • O-II 150 Teaser 8.6 years ago

    @UnknownNate That can be tricky, but it's very satisfying when it works out. I have made mudguards for this, and they look brilliant.

  • O-II 150 Teaser 8.6 years ago

    @UnknownNate It's mostly about patience, and getting the proportions right. Adding the smaller details to angled surfaces and/or having a camo scheme is annoying, though.

  • Ke-89 8.6 years ago

    @General360 Thanks, I actually had to mod the engine for less power in order for it to not be too fast.

  • Ke-89 8.6 years ago

    @UnknownNate Thanks :)

  • URGENT! Please Help! 8.6 years ago

    @DeezDucks Try to downscale the links? I think that they're simply too big.

  • O-II 150 Teaser 8.6 years ago

    @Wahoo12 This is "using" a naval gun (secondary of Yamato) with a penetration of 108mm at 15000m, so if we imagine that tank warfare goes crazy and uses this sort of gun, you need more armor than a Tiger II.

  • Rover 8.6 years ago

    @SUPERSAMROCK Wow, you can't have beat me by more than 0.5 sec.

  • O-II 150 Teaser 8.6 years ago

    @DeezDucks Thanks, but sadly I dont know much about that. My tanks are mostly about looks, and basic features.

  • O-II 150 Teaser 8.6 years ago

    @Wahoo12 Well, it's more a case of wanting to be safe against the next gen of allied tanks. But yeah, probably a bit overkill.

  • O-II 150 Teaser 8.6 years ago

    @aseder No this is a foctional Japanese development of it, description will be there soon.

  • Guys,read this!!!! 8.6 years ago

    @DanAviation Well, 03:00 GMT is US morning, the other is US morning. Most of the playerbase lives there. Personally I play most around 20:00, which is why I think that 03:00 is what'll work best.

  • Guys,read this!!!! 8.6 years ago

    @DanAviation I haven't got a clue, GMT is +-0.

  • Guys,read this!!!! 8.6 years ago

    Around 03:00 GMT, I've found.

  • Want your creation in a video? 8.6 years ago

    @T0PD0GDEFENSIVECO It's one of my older ones, but I think the outcome was good. Feel free to use any of my other creations though.

  • Want your creation in a video? 8.6 years ago

    How about my Ostwind?

  • Please add hollow parts - Suggestion 8.6 years ago

    @ElGatoVolador While both of them are outstanding builders, neither of them has really done this.

  • Please add hollow parts - Suggestion 8.6 years ago

    @ElGatoVolador I'll believe you the moment you make a really good MiG-15 or F86.

  • Please add hollow parts - Suggestion 8.6 years ago

    @ElGatoVolador Let's say I want a round nose intake. That merges perfectly with the fuselage behind, that just can't be done without this.

  • Please add hollow parts - Suggestion 8.6 years ago

    Yes, especially the inlet feature would be very, very helpful

  • Su-35 Flanker E 8.6 years ago

    @RedFalcon You can make fuselage pieces of whatever size you want, and move whatever you want wherver you want. There are a lot of other neat features, but those are the mosr important ones to me.

  • Triebflügel-C Thrust Wing Fighter 8.6 years ago

    @haidebiany Thanks a lot! Greatly appreciated.

  • Triebflügel-C Thrust Wing Fighter 8.6 years ago

    @kikasshes How do you scale parts, anyways? I've thought about this for some time.