Well, it depends on how you want your engine to be. You can use rotators or pistons in several configurations to create an engine that doesn't use fuel.
I use a particular input on a rotator and attach it to a propeller (not a pre built one, you have to build one yourself) like on this plane
@BadahhMuscleCar001 i would have done so either way, you got second place but i can't give you the prize and that's the problem. Is it okay if i give it to the next in line or do i just leave it. Sorry but I'm really confused as to why i can't go to your profile.
Not really relevant to the question, but his account also started commenting on some builds recently. For example, before getting banned he made an entry for my Microcar challenge and yesterday i got a comment from his account asking about the results.
@BadahhMuscleCar001 hey man, i just checked and i can't access your profile page by clicking on your username. Is it ok if i grade your build but give the prize to the next in line? Is there a way i can fix this problem? Just wanted to ask before posting the results.
@BadahhMuscleCar001 i'll post them either today or tomorrow, i've been away for almost the entire month so i didn't have time to judge the builds properly.
@TheMouse basically it was a mess. Passed 5 years waiting for what turned out to be an unfinished, buggy early access that costed as much as the regular KSP without most of the features.
@Biological3DPrinter to attend all entries should be successors of the challenge (basically they should be based on the cockpit part of the challenge)
After that the build should respect the rule criteria that you can find on the challenge post's description.
If you want to enter this i suggest making the build a sub-assembly and use it on the cockpit part from the challenge.
@Nyamomin yes it does include side mirros since i'm using the site's measurements to count which builds count or not.
But if the width Is like 1.6/1.7m with side mirros i can make and exception.
uhhhhhh, sorry man but i just checked the size and i unfortunately have to disqualify this.
It's 2.4 meters wide so it doesn't fit the rules.
Still cool build, i hope you can modify this so it fits in the size limits.
@BYardley i managed to find some information about the size and it unfortunately doesn't count. It's a 4 meters long and 1.8 meters wide car so it's more of a B segment Subcompact than a Microcar.
T
+1Hey, just a little advice, could you put a "challenge" tag on this post. That way it will be easier to find
Well, it depends on how you want your engine to be. You can use rotators or pistons in several configurations to create an engine that doesn't use fuel.
I use a particular input on a rotator and attach it to a propeller (not a pre built one, you have to build one yourself) like on this plane
All tags are partecipants of the challenge
@BadahhMuscleCar001
@SamTheUncle i forgor 💀
All tags are partecipants of the challenge
@Biological3DPrinter
@SCSP
@30
@BadahhMuscleCar001 i would have done so either way, you got second place but i can't give you the prize and that's the problem. Is it okay if i give it to the next in line or do i just leave it. Sorry but I'm really confused as to why i can't go to your profile.
+1@BadahhMuscleCar001 what should i do?
+1Not really relevant to the question, but his account also started commenting on some builds recently. For example, before getting banned he made an entry for my Microcar challenge and yesterday i got a comment from his account asking about the results.
@BadahhMuscleCar001 hey man, i just checked and i can't access your profile page by clicking on your username. Is it ok if i grade your build but give the prize to the next in line? Is there a way i can fix this problem? Just wanted to ask before posting the results.
+1@BadahhMuscleCar001 i'll post them either today or tomorrow, i've been away for almost the entire month so i didn't have time to judge the builds properly.
+1All tags were requested
@DatFiat126Fan19
@TheMouse
Bro think he's on the team💀
+1"I am completely mentally stable"
+10....
...
"Oh hey look a civilian airliner!"
hold this
+2Great entry 👍
+1Hur hur
+1hurhur hur
hur hurhur, hurhur
hur hur, hurhur
hur hur, hurhur
@HuskyDynamics01 good point
@TheMouse basically it was a mess. Passed 5 years waiting for what turned out to be an unfinished, buggy early access that costed as much as the regular KSP without most of the features.
+1@Graingy i mean, i hope it doesn't end up like the KSP2 launch.
+1WE'RE GETTING THE ENTIRE SP COMMUNITY HYPED UP WITH THIS ONE🗣️🗣️🗣️💥💥💥‼️‼️‼️‼️
+1I always build with a lot of passion and try to keep high quality, so much so that this was crowned by the SP community as my best work.
+2H word? which H-word? Those are "Jonda Civic" and "Jonda NSX", no H required.
There's no H-word in ba sing se
+3@DatFiat126Guy19 well that sucks :(.
I hope it's not a big real and that you can post it anyways.
10/10 screenshot
+1@Biological3DPrinter to attend all entries should be successors of the challenge (basically they should be based on the cockpit part of the challenge)
After that the build should respect the rule criteria that you can find on the challenge post's description.
If you want to enter this i suggest making the build a sub-assembly and use it on the cockpit part from the challenge.
@Nyamomin yes it does include side mirros since i'm using the site's measurements to count which builds count or not.
+1But if the width Is like 1.6/1.7m with side mirros i can make and exception.
Damn, this could have been real good in my microcar challenge
+2...since i'm still waiting for this to be judged for a challenge :\ ...
@30 no problem bro 👍
@theNoobCountry2 this Is meant to be an entry for my Microcar challenge, i wasn't talking about the site's rules
That's cool, could you add a description with a bit of info about the car, so you can respect all of the rules.
+1🤨📸
@DatTrainAndCarGuy19 Oppenheimer stare.png
@Kerbango i think you could just shorten them up a bit and it should be fine, because otherwise this car is a really good little thing.
uhhhhhh, sorry man but i just checked the size and i unfortunately have to disqualify this.
It's 2.4 meters wide so it doesn't fit the rules.
Still cool build, i hope you can modify this so it fits in the size limits.
oh wow, this is cool
+1"Your remake is worse than Megamind 2🗣️🗣️ !!!! 🔥🔥🔥"
+3@DatTrainAndCarGuy19
Bro was so fast he upvoted before the build finished publishing 💀
+1ALL TAGS WERE REQUESTED
@DatTrainAndCarGuy19
@BYardley
@Mousewithamachinegun122
LIVE AIRLINERBUILDER REACTION
+1HEY!
+1Well that was fast💀
+1Step 1: go back to monky
+1Step 2: ??????
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Profit
sorry man but the car should have at least 20 parts to enter the challenge, so this is disqualified. You can try again, no worries.
+1@SBACERT yeah it seems to fit all of the rules. I'll test this out later
@BYardley i managed to find some information about the size and it unfortunately doesn't count. It's a 4 meters long and 1.8 meters wide car so it's more of a B segment Subcompact than a Microcar.
+1@SBACERT your build should have at least 20 parts to be accepted in the challenge. Any lower Is certain disqualification
@001 sure!
+1@SBACERT don't be afraid to take your time, you've got more than 2 months ahead of you to build so no worries.