humans are basically nothing more than evolved pond scum. Therefore it’s consistent to say that human life is not inherently more sacred than a weed’s, because several billion years ago, we had a common ancestor. They might even argue that to cull the weak would be acting consistently with these alleged ‘laws of nature’. But of course Christians would define such actions as immoral.
“if life [in and of itself] were really what is sacred, then all life would be sacred. But nobody believes that … After all, weeds are alive. Hence, if killing were wrong just because it is causing death or the loss of life, then the same principle would apply with the same strength to pulling weeds in a garden. If it is not immoral to weed a garden, then life as such cannot really be sacred, and killing as such cannot be morally wrong
Soldiers in a battle are not prosecuted for killing enemy soldiers, and are in fact morally protected (at least on paper) against various forms of torture, punishment or mistreatment by the Geneva Convention for their work. This once again points to the potential lawlessness of a situation in civilian life where killing is no longer immoral and doesn't have any consequences that are significantly different from when one may refuse to kill in such a scenario. A soldier that does not kill on the battlefield is not afforded any special treatment compared to a soldier that does. Thus it is actually much better in this scenario to kill everyone who stands against you in order to secure your own safety.
@1997toyotasupra i would just accept it and fight back and try my best to kill you . if they die they die. i wouldn't call it anything its just part of nature. id do the same if a mountain lion came in. if they die they die if i die i die i would blame no one but myself for being either too slow or too weak. life is a struggle. shit happens. people live die kill thrive and do what it takes. the whole idea of murdering another only came about once people started getting weak. if you died in a fight with someone it was your fault. no one else was responsible for you being too weak to defend yourself or to follow through with your actions.
@KSPFSXandSP respect for the dead. ha. the dead are dead. there is nothing to respect but the stupidity of people who just dont move on with their lives and accept it happend and it will happen again
@KSPFSXandSP yes its unacceptable after the war but think of it as this. when invading a country you consider everyone a enemy. 300,000 civs? more like 300,000 future soldiers and spies. when you fight war there is no civilians. there are only enemies and allies. understand? thats what war is. you and the enemy. the enemy of my enemy id my friend. but the friend and family of my enemy is also my enemy. plain and simple understand,. if you beat someone to death your not going to go sleep with their sister are you? no because shed stab you in your back. plain and simple logical. that is all the Japanese did. and the soldiers thought . why the hell not enjoy it? so they did. that is what war is. its not a competition or a game. its for resources or causes or just for fun. there are no laws of war. there is no right or wrong on the battlefield there never has been. you do what you do to achieve your goal. and to eliminate future threats you also wipe out potential threats. and that is what your "civilians" are. potential threats and woman who can create future potential threats.
@KSPFSXandSP think of it this way war is hell you think it can be watered down? wait till a new great war comes. even if it isnt you picture it as if it was. do you think a army invading will take a chance with a soldier hidden among civilians? no . they wont. indiscriminate killing is part of war. the more you water it down the more you create friendly casualties. say in the gulf war. or vietnam. if we had killed without remorse or thought we wouldnt have had to worry about who is friendly and who is not. war is hell civilians die people die . war is HELL. it is the slaughter of our fellow men like lambs to slaughter. it just matters who swings first decides who is the "wolf" in sheeps clothing. the more you fight and thrive the better off you are. war is indiscriminate. just as is a gun. the only difference is who pulls the trigger. the more you restrict your men and their movements and actions. the more easily they are trapped and slaughtered. chemical weapons are illegal in war as are flame throwers. do you think the enemy cares? no they dont. your fear makes you vulnerable. like a knight in Armour without his breastplate. he is wide open. do you think when it comes down to it that you could crawl from the mud and blood and kill another or be killed? or would you hide in fear? or would you try to run? taking your chances against the aim of the enemy? war is literal hell on earth the more you try to restrict the number of civilian casualties the more you put your own men at risk. the more you put your friends and family and their friends families sons and daughters at risk . now would you want to be responsible for that? no. so you make it a "LAW: so you dont have to take responsibility. if they dont flee from a warzone. then they ARE the enemy. if they come from the warzone to your country then they are the enemy. war is not a game. it is total caos death and destruction the taking and slaughtering of fellow beings.
@Aerobako it means we are hypocrites and monsters my good sir. when it comes down to be killed or kill we kill. we slaughter everything for our gain. we kill we hunt we are animals. we breed and thrive. we are animals. the only different is our creativity and intelligence. our greatest creations where born from war.our greatest achievements where during conflict or war. our entire species has survived due to fighting itself and singling out the weak and picking them off. fighting ourselves and our environment for every inch. to kill and destroy is part of our existence as is war.
@Aerobako a heartless world a heartless man all in all we all turn to sand bone to dust flesh to ash. all in all. a fiery flash! so pillage and plunder . steal and kill. hunt and be hunted. enjoy life without restriction of word or belief!
@ZombieSloth genocide is jsut a word created to describe the loss of a great amount of people and the hands of others. as is murder is used to describe the loss of the life of one by another. it describes what happend. but not in depth. war is war. people die no matter what you do. when you fight you either fight to kill . or you die. and to put it simply we have always killed no matter what we have consumed our own kind before and yet now we label it wrong? we are animals no matter what we say. our wars are as you might say a slaughter on both sides at one point or another. as it is said war is hell. and no i do not justify it . im saying it happend and happens so just accept it. a grudge held over loss creates more loss. blood is spilt all the time and yet no one says a word. because it isnt considered to be in a war . so they call it murder. life is a war an endless bloody conflict you try to make it through as long as you can. blood is spilt life goes on. and death takes all in the end. yet to say the death of many is wrong? it was inevitable. as is mine and yours. as is everyone elses. murder is a word as is genocide. a "free thinker" is jsut a man seeking power who is either afraid or not content. a man who is willing to trust another with his life is either a fool or he has trust in the person with a deep bond of that similar to a brothers and that goes up in the ranks of a army so the trust goes down along with the order. thus no matter the side. they think they are righteous. only after the slaughter is it considered "wrong" . war is hell.
people . grow up . war is war . death is death . there is no watering it down. in this world there is no right or wrong . the way things are told is what is perceived as right and wrong . in the end everything is forgotten everything fades. but one thing will never change . war is hell. burning raping pillaging. death slaughter. bombs spears swords guns bows arrows sticks and stones siege engines. if a man is not willing to fight than he shall die. a man who shows mercy shall be shot in the back. a man who does not shoot first shall be shot. in the end its the survival of the one who is the true hunter. the ones who are not afraid but are feared. if in life you are afraid then you are prey.
@AviownCorp once i finish the frame im going to send you the body of the vtol gunship im making i need you to give it stable flight( like the ability to hover in place)
@CALVIN232 its a cannon and like all my others and the turrets and the guns on my ships and tanks and apcs can be fired by selecting the bombs and pressing fire
@TwinStarIndustries i tend to go in groups with my builds so never expect a repeat and i make variations on my aircraft often but my ships tend to each be different
@TwinStarIndustries when i build i build in sets i pick three names prior and plan them out to an extent the first 2 are destroyers this is a battleship i plan to do a aircraft carrier a submarine and also a a few aircraft
humans are basically nothing more than evolved pond scum. Therefore it’s consistent to say that human life is not inherently more sacred than a weed’s, because several billion years ago, we had a common ancestor. They might even argue that to cull the weak would be acting consistently with these alleged ‘laws of nature’. But of course Christians would define such actions as immoral.
“if life [in and of itself] were really what is sacred, then all life would be sacred. But nobody believes that … After all, weeds are alive. Hence, if killing were wrong just because it is causing death or the loss of life, then the same principle would apply with the same strength to pulling weeds in a garden. If it is not immoral to weed a garden, then life as such cannot really be sacred, and killing as such cannot be morally wrong
Soldiers in a battle are not prosecuted for killing enemy soldiers, and are in fact morally protected (at least on paper) against various forms of torture, punishment or mistreatment by the Geneva Convention for their work. This once again points to the potential lawlessness of a situation in civilian life where killing is no longer immoral and doesn't have any consequences that are significantly different from when one may refuse to kill in such a scenario. A soldier that does not kill on the battlefield is not afforded any special treatment compared to a soldier that does. Thus it is actually much better in this scenario to kill everyone who stands against you in order to secure your own safety.
@1997toyotasupra i would just accept it and fight back and try my best to kill you . if they die they die. i wouldn't call it anything its just part of nature. id do the same if a mountain lion came in. if they die they die if i die i die i would blame no one but myself for being either too slow or too weak. life is a struggle. shit happens. people live die kill thrive and do what it takes. the whole idea of murdering another only came about once people started getting weak. if you died in a fight with someone it was your fault. no one else was responsible for you being too weak to defend yourself or to follow through with your actions.
@KSPFSXandSP in war there is no murder. just the slaughter of one side or the other.
@1997toyotasupra my mind hast been corrupted i was always thinking like this. its this world that is corrupted beyond comparison .
@KSPFSXandSP respect for the dead. ha. the dead are dead. there is nothing to respect but the stupidity of people who just dont move on with their lives and accept it happend and it will happen again
@KSPFSXandSP yes its unacceptable after the war but think of it as this. when invading a country you consider everyone a enemy. 300,000 civs? more like 300,000 future soldiers and spies. when you fight war there is no civilians. there are only enemies and allies. understand? thats what war is. you and the enemy. the enemy of my enemy id my friend. but the friend and family of my enemy is also my enemy. plain and simple understand,. if you beat someone to death your not going to go sleep with their sister are you? no because shed stab you in your back. plain and simple logical. that is all the Japanese did. and the soldiers thought . why the hell not enjoy it? so they did. that is what war is. its not a competition or a game. its for resources or causes or just for fun. there are no laws of war. there is no right or wrong on the battlefield there never has been. you do what you do to achieve your goal. and to eliminate future threats you also wipe out potential threats. and that is what your "civilians" are. potential threats and woman who can create future potential threats.
@KSPFSXandSP think of it this way war is hell you think it can be watered down? wait till a new great war comes. even if it isnt you picture it as if it was. do you think a army invading will take a chance with a soldier hidden among civilians? no . they wont. indiscriminate killing is part of war. the more you water it down the more you create friendly casualties. say in the gulf war. or vietnam. if we had killed without remorse or thought we wouldnt have had to worry about who is friendly and who is not. war is hell civilians die people die . war is HELL. it is the slaughter of our fellow men like lambs to slaughter. it just matters who swings first decides who is the "wolf" in sheeps clothing. the more you fight and thrive the better off you are. war is indiscriminate. just as is a gun. the only difference is who pulls the trigger. the more you restrict your men and their movements and actions. the more easily they are trapped and slaughtered. chemical weapons are illegal in war as are flame throwers. do you think the enemy cares? no they dont. your fear makes you vulnerable. like a knight in Armour without his breastplate. he is wide open. do you think when it comes down to it that you could crawl from the mud and blood and kill another or be killed? or would you hide in fear? or would you try to run? taking your chances against the aim of the enemy? war is literal hell on earth the more you try to restrict the number of civilian casualties the more you put your own men at risk. the more you put your friends and family and their friends families sons and daughters at risk . now would you want to be responsible for that? no. so you make it a "LAW: so you dont have to take responsibility. if they dont flee from a warzone. then they ARE the enemy. if they come from the warzone to your country then they are the enemy. war is not a game. it is total caos death and destruction the taking and slaughtering of fellow beings.
@Aerobako it means we are hypocrites and monsters my good sir. when it comes down to be killed or kill we kill. we slaughter everything for our gain. we kill we hunt we are animals. we breed and thrive. we are animals. the only different is our creativity and intelligence. our greatest creations where born from war.our greatest achievements where during conflict or war. our entire species has survived due to fighting itself and singling out the weak and picking them off. fighting ourselves and our environment for every inch. to kill and destroy is part of our existence as is war.
@Aerobako a heartless world a heartless man all in all we all turn to sand bone to dust flesh to ash. all in all. a fiery flash! so pillage and plunder . steal and kill. hunt and be hunted. enjoy life without restriction of word or belief!
@Aerobako XD hahahahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahaahaha
@ArmiaKrajowaDidNothingWrong diamonds?
@Meawk psst its better to fly at night
@ZombieSloth genocide is jsut a word created to describe the loss of a great amount of people and the hands of others. as is murder is used to describe the loss of the life of one by another. it describes what happend. but not in depth. war is war. people die no matter what you do. when you fight you either fight to kill . or you die. and to put it simply we have always killed no matter what we have consumed our own kind before and yet now we label it wrong? we are animals no matter what we say. our wars are as you might say a slaughter on both sides at one point or another. as it is said war is hell. and no i do not justify it . im saying it happend and happens so just accept it. a grudge held over loss creates more loss. blood is spilt all the time and yet no one says a word. because it isnt considered to be in a war . so they call it murder. life is a war an endless bloody conflict you try to make it through as long as you can. blood is spilt life goes on. and death takes all in the end. yet to say the death of many is wrong? it was inevitable. as is mine and yours. as is everyone elses. murder is a word as is genocide. a "free thinker" is jsut a man seeking power who is either afraid or not content. a man who is willing to trust another with his life is either a fool or he has trust in the person with a deep bond of that similar to a brothers and that goes up in the ranks of a army so the trust goes down along with the order. thus no matter the side. they think they are righteous. only after the slaughter is it considered "wrong" . war is hell.
people . grow up . war is war . death is death . there is no watering it down. in this world there is no right or wrong . the way things are told is what is perceived as right and wrong . in the end everything is forgotten everything fades. but one thing will never change . war is hell. burning raping pillaging. death slaughter. bombs spears swords guns bows arrows sticks and stones siege engines. if a man is not willing to fight than he shall die. a man who shows mercy shall be shot in the back. a man who does not shoot first shall be shot. in the end its the survival of the one who is the true hunter. the ones who are not afraid but are feared. if in life you are afraid then you are prey.
@AviownCorp once i finish the frame im going to send you the body of the vtol gunship im making i need you to give it stable flight( like the ability to hover in place)
@RAF1 hey ive returned from the dead ^^ also good camo
@Jetliner101 ill work on one as a side project ^^
hey @AviownCorp im back and i need your help i have a special thing planned for my return to the game
merry christmas lil timmy
RIGHT HERE
@CALVIN232 ok
@CALVIN232 sure how big?
@CALVIN232 its a cannon and like all my others and the turrets and the guns on my ships and tanks and apcs can be fired by selecting the bombs and pressing fire
@Supercraft888 ehhhhhhhhhhh
@MechWARRIOR57 yes it is and one i really need done
@Halphas thanks
@AviownCorp what do you think?
@TwinStarIndustries you might find this one a lil bit enjoyable its an older creation though
@TwinStarIndustries thanks
@TwinStarIndustries i tend to go in groups with my builds so never expect a repeat and i make variations on my aircraft often but my ships tend to each be different
@Halphas
@TwinStarIndustries when i build i build in sets i pick three names prior and plan them out to an extent the first 2 are destroyers this is a battleship i plan to do a aircraft carrier a submarine and also a a few aircraft
@MechWARRIOR57 ok ill be waiting with a MINI yamato
@MechWARRIOR57 ok and im running on a junk pc from 2007 how can a new one not handle that?
@MechWARRIOR57 ok..........10000 will be my limit in multiplayer i can run up to 12000
XD ill be waiting for you with my the yamato
@MechWARRIOR57 though what do you think of.....this.....thing
@MechWARRIOR57 ah forgot about that stupid mobile restriction
@MechWARRIOR57 too big?
@OverlordAeronautics XD
@TheBigEgg thanks
@kukimuki1234 i used your insignia's on this my man
@Seeras ok
@ViperGB thank you good fellow
@MechWARRIOR57 XP
@Supercraft888 XD so its just around minimum wage
@Supercraft888 is it too big already?
@Himynameiswalrus @Supercraft888 @SteadFastContracting thanks