17.4k karlosdarkness Comments

  • Biplane rocket 9.4 years ago

    Would have been five stars if you had it so the little plane was the one you continued to fly.

  • SwitchBlade 9.4 years ago

    Decent original idea a little tidying around the tail and it would be superb as a first effort.

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @Walrus aircraft feel free to alter as you see fit, just be careful not to make it too fast as that's why I left it with restricted airflow 200mph seems about right for the period.

  • TKH's Stunt plane challenge (ended) 9.4 years ago

    @TheKillerHawk21 power to 50% and just let it fly itself off.

  • TKH's Stunt plane challenge (ended) 9.4 years ago

    I've just had three goes and got the model B on the deck once suggest 5% power and fairly flat approach from behind.

  • TKH Stuntstar B 9.4 years ago

    Carrier approach runs lead to squeaky bum incidents but at about 5% power on approach you can get her on the main deck of the bigger carrier without breaking the gear, for USS Tiny your only hope would be a gear up belly landing.

  • TKH's Stunt plane challenge (ended) 9.4 years ago

    No one mentioned carrier landings!!! Argh.

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @WaterAirLand - black magic..... modded xml file to adjust the attachment point on the rotator and then it really is just a case of rotation and building. I personally blame @WalrusAircraft he's the first person I saw create the modified rotator and without him a third of my stuff would be wingless, without propellers or landing gear free.

  • Bell P63 KingCobra 9.4 years ago

    @TheChosenOne by doesn't take off I assume you can't get it to move? If that's the case then reread the instructions. 5 and push the slide up, deselect 5 push the slide up to the top to be ready to fold your gear, power up and off you go, 6 to fold your gear. If it's any other problem please do tell as I've just downloaded it and had an error free flight out round the carrier and back home.

  • Gloster SS.37 Gladiator 9.4 years ago

    Way too quick but apart from that it's excellent.

  • Gloster SS.37 Gladiator 9.4 years ago

    Looks stunning, downloading as I type.

  • Challenge stunt plane 9.4 years ago

    Simple and effective, no COL showing up is interesting.

  • Sea plane bomber 9.4 years ago

    You asked for clues as how to build better aircraft. 1 - have an idea as to what you would like to achieve 2 - have some useful bits saved as sub assemblies that you can drop into a build 3 - if you can't get a part to fit where you want try rotating it or blocks next to it to move it where you want 4 - if all else fails post it up and ask for help

  • Comet(I)plus 9.4 years ago

    Nicely built aircraft.

  • P-51 Mustang5 9.4 years ago

    Wing pitch controls needed inverting but otherwise an interesting concept, you probably don't need the rear set of engines either.

  • The Saber 9.4 years ago

    Flys great? This game is called simple planes not complex planes, not sure any of the vtol stuff or noseconse add anything but here's some points for original thinking.

  • Spincopter 9.4 years ago

    Can't see that you've added much other than floats so whilst I would love to get you off zero this isn't the way to do it.

  • Flock Class Night Strike Fighter 9.4 years ago

    Not a bad effort at all. Suggested improvement, move the rear gear forward 1 block (reduces take off speed), alter your wings so the ailerons are on the outer wing segment (improved roll rate), adjust the inner wing segments to a symmetrical profile (stops the floaty light nose).

  • TKH Stuntstar 9.4 years ago

    @JacobHardy64 version with more yaw just uploaded

  • TKH Stuntstar 9.4 years ago

    @JacobHardy64 you want more yaw I shall see what I can do, obviously is some currently but let's give it more!!!

  • TKH Stuntstar 9.4 years ago

    @KingDeadshot as above

  • TKH Stuntstar 9.4 years ago

    @JacobHardy64 I am not that worried helping those unable to rate is important, it only takes maybe 2mins to try most planes a few take a while longer, a few even keep you entertained long enough to merit a save.

  • TKH Stuntstar 9.4 years ago

    @KingDeadshot Almost my bedtime, another 8.5 hours and its time to get up for another busy day

  • TKH Stuntstar 9.4 years ago

    @KingDeadshot 14 seconds your slipping

  • X-36 Small1 9.4 years ago

    Great little fun aircraft.

  • SB2C Helldiver 9.4 years ago

    Making the wings fold may take a while, first effort everything just hasn't bonded at all.......

  • AVRO 621 "Tutor" 9.4 years ago

    Lovely looking replica, horizontal stabilizers are a bit bouncy though.

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @Cedy117 can I have a play with the wings on your Helldiver see if we could get the wings to fold?

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @blueangelproduction rather than reinvent the wheel here's a rather lovely Dauntless; https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1mOq1I/SBD-Dauntless

  • 1000 Point Special 9.4 years ago

    Well done an interesting little plane.

  • Waterplane 9.4 years ago

    As suggested alter the ailerons, even moving them nearer the end of the wings makes a big difference.

  • It doesn't fly just try 9.4 years ago

    Your right it's terrible, create an account and start with something a bit simpler?

  • DIY Flying Boat 9.4 years ago

    Great hull now make me a Short Sunderland.

  • Hypnotoadian Challenge 9.4 years ago

    Not my style at all but I will give it a whirl

  • Simple airliner 9.4 years ago

    Flys nicely.

  • Blueangelproduction Simplish Fighter 9.4 years ago

    @UnknownVectors thanks for the rating, did you by any chance have a fly of my biplane yesterday?

  • Easy jet 9.4 years ago

    Nice enough to fly keep working on your own designs

  • Blueangelproduction Simplish Fighter 9.4 years ago

    @JacobHardy64 thanks for the pre-emptive strike.

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @blueangelproduction I'm aware of the dauntless and also aware an excellent example already exists on here, will have a look and play.

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @Bartfartplanes I will look to dial out some of the nose sinkage on v1.1 when I next have this aircraft in for work.

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @Nightraider @thealban @LordofLego @planesnthings @hypnotoad @Vikdesigns @KinDeadshot @Viper28 @blueangelproduction @Bartfartplanes Many thanks for flying and rating this plane, appreciate when people like stuff I've done.

  • LHS 33 by 9.4 years ago

    Nice build the swing wings work well you need to set the rear horizontal surfaces to semis to dial out the Jose lift but other than that quite nice to fly. I would have linked the vtol nozzles to pitch personally and perhaps fitted modified X2 engines but apart from that and the weapons on the tail it's a good little plane.

  • exploding ram 9.4 years ago

    Fun just keep it slow.

  • DH Tigermoth 9.4 years ago

    Red in front of blue always, similar vertical axis helps, closer together they get the more responsive it tends to be. Yellow only becomes a major issue if you are looking to make a vtol aircraft.

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @CheekyMonkey @JacobHardy64 @Austinowen many thanks for the ratings and comments.

  • Panda's fighter jet 9.4 years ago

    It's a solid effort well done.

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @PlanesOfOld many thanks, any suggestions as to anything needing alterations?

  • Business Class XH-47 9.4 years ago

    I like it even though it's letahal as it is, tail need fixing and the gear could do with moving from behind the jet exhaust.

  • Carrier Fighter Challenge 9.4 years ago

    My pre WW2 biplane fighter would fit this ideally. https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/1C6JE4/1930s-Naval-Biplane-Fighter-v1-0

  • 1930's Naval Biplane Fighter v1.0 9.4 years ago

    @Me600 @Stormy780 You have both given useful feedback before, would be happy to hear your comments.