@LuciferOfPoland Ok. It is your own opinion. I understand it doesn't handle that great, but it does not look autistic. If you didn't know, "autistic" is not a way to describe someone's or something's appearance. Autism is a very serious desease. And what kind of stupid guy says he can't build good planes and goes out of it's way to curse three times a tank from a guy that is currently 1533 points above him? This is like me talking trash about QingyZhou, Sauce, etc. But you know why I don't? Because I respect their builds. I understand that Sauce's Fighting Falcon is extremely complex and impossible to be mobile friendly - but I don't mock that. Your anger managing issues can be easily fixed. Go see a psychologist. It might help you (Seriously - It might). Back to the initial comments about the tank's looks - It looks the way I pictured it to be. If you don't like it, build a better one yourself! If it is because the tank's tracks are made from tires, deal with it. If it is because of the tank's lack of complexity, deal with it. To sum it all up, DEAL WITH IT!
@DerekSP I personally think that the 797 will replace the 757 and, if it has a high enough capacity version, maybe even the 767. As you said, the A321 has already a very respectable range , but, if a low fares airline (e.g.: EasyJet) wanted to fly a huge route (e.g.: Singapore to New York - Singapor Airlines Route operated by the A350-900 ULR) on a plane the size of an A321, it might need a new plane. To deliver an astronomical range - similar to the A350 - it might need the updates Airbus fited the A350-900, A350-1000 and A350-900 ULR, like composite materials on the wings and fuselage, allowing for a more complex but streamlined shape. The current sharklets on the A321neo would need to be replaced by something like an A330neo's winglet. Returning to the 797, it would fit the middle-of-the-market airliner spot just as well as the 757 if it can be used as an ETOPS Plane. I believe that the 797 will mix the 737 Max, 757, 777x, 787 and a few technologies from the A330neo and A350. I also believe that the 797 will have a wing bend like a 787, but will sport split winglets like a 737 Max. It's cabin will mix a 787's with the A350's. The construction will be similar to the 777x and A350. In proportion to the wings, the engine will appear to be, approximately, the same as the 787. Talking about the A322 you mentioned, it won't be happening, because the A330neo can fit that spot. I can see that you know what you're talking about.
That is a Lockheed Martin L-1011 TriStar's S-Duct. It is very hard to build because of the inlet's geometry. But Sauce made the world's most detailed F-16 with nice CURVES so he can probably make this.
@THEAIRCRAFTCRAFTER Sorry, I tried to make it without the Tracks Mod but the tyre track system wasn't working for me, as it would either be too soft and shatter or too stiff and not even budge (probably due to connections but I don't know).
Thank you, @AtlasSP, @Armyguy1534, @StrikeFighter04, @CrashFighter05, @ThePilotDude, @Stormfur and @BuiltBionixInd10 for the upvote and @DeathStalker627 for the spotlight!
@Homemade How come? I've tested the missiles and they're greatly modified from the stock Guardian missiles in-game. I'd reckon that, later on, he could make a new version with this core and a custom shell.
@Sm10684 Nice. I've been grounded, but fine nonetheless. I'm back in the virtual engine making business with a naturally aspirated hot-V6 for a FWD front engined hot hatch.
I recommend the TB-30 Epsilon, nice and small propeller trainer plane. Plus I might be a bit biased to it. Also I would be interested in those videos. Hopefully I'm not too late.
@fridolin Hm. Almost like you're the only player who can't play with mods in the world. It's just that people who can use mods to their benefit will use mods to their benefit. It's simple.
I know about the 60 minutes rule. In 1972 I think, the rule was adapted and the A300 was born.
+1What if the 3 engines together were as efficient as the two on the A350ULR?
+1@GhostHTX I did! Thanks for noticing! I've also shortened the nose cone and extended the wings a little. I'm really glad you like it!
+1@Dllama4 Any potato version coming? I need a sub-900 part version to run on my PC.
+1@randomusername I will improve that.
+1@Sarin I will fix that!
+1@Sarin Maybe. But it is a twin-seater F-16, sooo....? I think it is the right length.
+1@danman12 Fair.
+1@XjayIndustrys Thanks, man! Appreciated it!
+1@LuciferOfPoland Ok. It is your own opinion. I understand it doesn't handle that great, but it does not look autistic. If you didn't know, "autistic" is not a way to describe someone's or something's appearance. Autism is a very serious desease. And what kind of stupid guy says he can't build good planes and goes out of it's way to curse three times a tank from a guy that is currently 1533 points above him? This is like me talking trash about QingyZhou, Sauce, etc. But you know why I don't? Because I respect their builds. I understand that Sauce's Fighting Falcon is extremely complex and impossible to be mobile friendly - but I don't mock that. Your anger managing issues can be easily fixed. Go see a psychologist. It might help you (Seriously - It might). Back to the initial comments about the tank's looks - It looks the way I pictured it to be. If you don't like it, build a better one yourself! If it is because the tank's tracks are made from tires, deal with it. If it is because of the tank's lack of complexity, deal with it. To sum it all up, DEAL WITH IT!
+1It's either a Chevy Malibu or an Impala
+1Isn't the A321 an Airbus?
+1I downloaded this plane, hopped on Google and started adding detail. I will publish a more detailed, AI Friendly version soon.
+1I NEED THEM! We can make blimps with those!
+1@DerekSP I personally think that the 797 will replace the 757 and, if it has a high enough capacity version, maybe even the 767. As you said, the A321 has already a very respectable range , but, if a low fares airline (e.g.: EasyJet) wanted to fly a huge route (e.g.: Singapore to New York - Singapor Airlines Route operated by the A350-900 ULR) on a plane the size of an A321, it might need a new plane. To deliver an astronomical range - similar to the A350 - it might need the updates Airbus fited the A350-900, A350-1000 and A350-900 ULR, like composite materials on the wings and fuselage, allowing for a more complex but streamlined shape. The current sharklets on the A321neo would need to be replaced by something like an A330neo's winglet. Returning to the 797, it would fit the middle-of-the-market airliner spot just as well as the 757 if it can be used as an ETOPS Plane. I believe that the 797 will mix the 737 Max, 757, 777x, 787 and a few technologies from the A330neo and A350. I also believe that the 797 will have a wing bend like a 787, but will sport split winglets like a 737 Max. It's cabin will mix a 787's with the A350's. The construction will be similar to the 777x and A350. In proportion to the wings, the engine will appear to be, approximately, the same as the 787. Talking about the A322 you mentioned, it won't be happening, because the A330neo can fit that spot. I can see that you know what you're talking about.
+1That is a Lockheed Martin L-1011 TriStar's S-Duct. It is very hard to build because of the inlet's geometry. But Sauce made the world's most detailed F-16 with nice CURVES so he can probably make this.
+1What's that map from the screenshots? I need it.
This is the predecessor for the T-10. The hull is actually a mix of the IS-6's and IS-3's, with a sprinkle of new design put on it.
Your design looks pretty neat though.
I have a reccomendation but it's not a hypercar per se. Only a hyper-sounding car. Can you do the Porsche 917K, please?
@THEAIRCRAFTCRAFTER Sorry, I tried to make it without the Tracks Mod but the tyre track system wasn't working for me, as it would either be too soft and shatter or too stiff and not even budge (probably due to connections but I don't know).
Thank you, @AtlasSP, @Armyguy1534, @StrikeFighter04, @CrashFighter05, @ThePilotDude, @Stormfur and @BuiltBionixInd10 for the upvote and @DeathStalker627 for the spotlight!
I must see it.
@AtlasSP Thank you very much!
@AtlasSP Can you take a look at this and consider it for your tank display? Thank you!
@AtlasSP I use the PC too, but I cannot run or make 1000 piece tanks, so I was wondering if I could make something with a lower part count.
@AtlasSP To make an appearance, does it need to be a 1000 part tank or can it be somewhat more mobile friendly but still detailed?
@Homemade How come? I've tested the missiles and they're greatly modified from the stock Guardian missiles in-game. I'd reckon that, later on, he could make a new version with this core and a custom shell.
Also, @IDoStuffTho, welcome to SP!
@Sm10684 Give me a sec, you'll be tagged right away!
@Sm10684 Want a lil sneak peek?
@Sm10684 Sure thing!
@Sm10684 Nice. I've been grounded, but fine nonetheless. I'm back in the virtual engine making business with a naturally aspirated hot-V6 for a FWD front engined hot hatch.
@Sm10684 How are ya bro?
@Sm10684 YeS. After a long time, tho.
@TheMitsuboshiBoi I cannot do it. Literally. Due to recent circumstances I can't.
@TheMitsuboshiBoi I cannot do it. That is why.
Unlisted or not wouldn't matter.
@TheMitsuboshiBoi Sorry, no.
@Othawne My pleasure.
I recommend the TB-30 Epsilon, nice and small propeller trainer plane. Plus I might be a bit biased to it. Also I would be interested in those videos. Hopefully I'm not too late.
@Homemade I didn't predict anything. You were just not paying enough attention. Lol.
@fridolin You don't say.
@fridolin Hm. Almost like you're the only player who can't play with mods in the world. It's just that people who can use mods to their benefit will use mods to their benefit. It's simple.
@Spikerya Lost interest, frankly.
@RailfanEthan You'll be able to see it from the start.
@RailfanEthan Amazing work! Sorry to be buggy, but could you help me with making a TGV? I have the framing for the conducting carriage done.
@Spikerya I... gave up on it.
@Plane66373637 POP POP POP POP POP UP AND DOWN HEADLIGHTS!
@Brendorkus Lagged for me too, I feel your pain.
@destroyerP Hell yeah!
@destroyerP No problem, it's my favourite tooo- voooooooooooooo- vrooooooooo- vro- pop pop or something, no one can replicate it
@Starmang10 Never said you should delete it, maybe learn to read?