@TUNDERTEAM thanks. the design pretty much is based of a mix of realistic (well as realistic as it can get) layouts. and fantasy design. so it looks like a fantasy plane from some random anime no one ever heard about. but in theory can be produced IRL
actually question: is there any maps from videogames that could be ported in to Simpleplanes thats somewhat large enough without being too costly on files?
@asteroidbook345 the V1 were more a flying bomb. the V2 i could agree to an extent but its more questionable than likely. not to mention the sources being recently put into question
we would like to place an order for 150 models with the following changes:
|
Larger engine
Retracting landing gear
4x Machine guns
2x hardpoints for 250lbs bombs or drop tanks.
|
optional:
Enclosed canopy
was about to say its not a yak 7 but when i looked around it turns out you were right. so not only is it an excellent build but i also learnt something new.
@Cennix ah. then i may have to nitpick a bit as the drivers position is blocking the part for the driveshaft. i would recommend putting the drivers position a bit to the side
@Titaninferna aye very detailed tho my first impressions were not so impressed. by first the exhaust looked like it was taken from the Mk V, then i wondered why the smaller oil cooler remained. then it was the "goshawk engine"
@Sparky6004 disregard last comment. i looked a bit further and noticed some M4 models have the HVSS suspension. but said models were also paired with a 105mm howitzer. the closest 2 models would be M4A4 105 or M4A3 105E [E for Early]
quite good
+1Starvation. Sounds soviet enough
+1these planes are overhyped.... but nice work
+1is there any possibilities to join any of these multiplayer sessions?
+1looks good
+1thats actually extremely cool
+1@TUNDERTEAM if you say so.
+1@TUNDERTEAM no... I m not good woth any of that. To worsen the situation i have a policy of not directly copying or recreating real life aircraft.
+1@Axartar well thats decent
+1@Freerider2142 not sure how i did either... anyway thanks for helping out.
+1Fuselage is a no no?
+1@Axartar thats understandable. try extending the barrel. that should make it resemble a cannon then.
+1the front of the turret is the only thing that bothers me. but overall its extremely good. better than what ill ever be able to.
+1@TUNDERTEAM my pc is barely able to work when i use this vehicle
+1looks cool
+1thats actually very cool
+1@TUNDERTEAM thanks. the design pretty much is based of a mix of realistic (well as realistic as it can get) layouts. and fantasy design. so it looks like a fantasy plane from some random anime no one ever heard about. but in theory can be produced IRL
+1@TUNDERTEAM thanks for the compliment.
aslong as others like it. then its good enough
+1congrats
+1i dont really want to be rude... but... its not really a world war two fighter.
its more of a early cold war fighter
+1@Kaveman interesting. ill look at the next posts with great interest
@Kaveman i see. tho id probly advice you to put the canopy a bit forward and lengthen the hull to accommodate said engine
it looks cool. but if i can be a nitpicking annoyance. wheres the engine placement? since it doesnt seem to be enough space in the back
@WaltySimplePlanes69 or simpleworks
@AndrewGarrison dumb idea. simpletanks
@FlyingPatriot i see. anything similar?
actually question: is there any maps from videogames that could be ported in to Simpleplanes thats somewhat large enough without being too costly on files?
@FlyingPatriot i see. bit of a bummer
@FlyingPatriot i see. but arent almost all maps there days bigger than GTAV?
@asteroidbook345 until proper sources can be found and confirmed. ill remain skepitcal
@asteroidbook345 the V1 were more a flying bomb. the V2 i could agree to an extent but its more questionable than likely. not to mention the sources being recently put into question
@asteroidbook345 experimental only. fired maybe a few times but never used
@Numbers2 yeah people still put memorial posts so its unlikely anyone follows it
@Ummmhelli so am i yet i try to improve
we would like to place an order for 150 models with the following changes:
|
Larger engine
Retracting landing gear
4x Machine guns
2x hardpoints for 250lbs bombs or drop tanks.
|
optional:
Enclosed canopy
@Ummmhelli well doesnt stop ye from improving so give it a try. ye might be able to make something amazing
so its some water effects and a sonic boom. ok
was about to say its not a yak 7 but when i looked around it turns out you were right. so not only is it an excellent build but i also learnt something new.
so heres an upvote
@BoganBoganTheKid dude... uncalled for
anyway it doesnt really look in place as a ww2 tank. but it is an interesting design overall.
@RomanoMilos ah. also i think the road wheels are a bit too small. but thats my opinion
probly rude of me... but how is a japanese tank.... tagged as china?
how is the tank? any critics?
@HighMike its not meant to be flyable. just an attempt on canopy design
@Dkuz not sure whats sad about that but arigh
@Dkuz on a previous post i had said i would only make 1 plane with it and then never again. so its unlikely ill ever use cockpit parts
@Cennix ah. then i may have to nitpick a bit as the drivers position is blocking the part for the driveshaft. i would recommend putting the drivers position a bit to the side
its an interesting design. tho im a bit curious. the sprockets. are they at the front or the back?
@Titaninferna aye very detailed tho my first impressions were not so impressed. by first the exhaust looked like it was taken from the Mk V, then i wondered why the smaller oil cooler remained. then it was the "goshawk engine"
hmm interesting design but now im curious about the building behind
@Sparky6004 disregard last comment. i looked a bit further and noticed some M4 models have the HVSS suspension. but said models were also paired with a 105mm howitzer. the closest 2 models would be M4A4 105 or M4A3 105E [E for Early]