10.5k teodor99 Comments

  • M4A3 Sherman 2.8 years ago

    @Sparky6004 so i was right that there was something off?

  • Realism Aircraft folder 2.8 years ago

    @handitover the flame is already out.

  • M4A3 Sherman 2.8 years ago

    @WarHawk95 interesting. i havent heard of a M4A3 with the M4 Front so it was a bit odd to me.

    since the M4A3 is the M4A2 with the Ford GAA engine while the M4 being a M4A1 with the early Welded hull.

    so my first impression was the M4 with the HVSS

  • F4Q Super Corsair 2.8 years ago

    @DieLoaf ok

  • M4A3 Sherman 2.8 years ago

    hmm. not the right hull so.... M4 HVSS?

  • Realism Aircraft folder 2.9 years ago

    @Mlancer actually that really is an interesting idea so good request. atleast in my opinion

  • Jagdpanzer 4/70 (V) 2.9 years ago

    @X4JB "Anyway this is still very fast for my standards." i thought ye rushed the build. sorry for misunderstanding

  • Jagdpanzer 4/70 (V) 2.9 years ago

    its still a great build. but dont rush yerself ol chap. take yer time on what ye wish to build and just have fun.

  • Can anyone help me make this tabk good? 2.9 years ago

    what ye mean plain? the design is good. all ye need to do is just add some exhaust and radiators. some antennas, hatches and etc. just put some more time. its a good start. you can do it

  • EL-37 "N052, Little Mouse" 2.9 years ago

    @DragoransEscarti i see. very interesting story tho

  • EL-37 "N052, Little Mouse" 2.9 years ago

    my biggest question. how did these tanks fail the 1st invasion?

  • Republic P-97 Bulldog 2.9 years ago

    @FeatherWing good idea tho

  • Republic P-97 Bulldog 2.9 years ago

    @FeatherWing nah. design doesnt match it...

  • CURSED Gloster Gladiator 2.9 years ago

    whats cursed about it?

  • Realism Aircraft folder 2.9 years ago

    @rexzion ok

  • Realism Aircraft folder 2.9 years ago

    @Alvin77TheUser its been a while since he has done anything.

  • Sealth CHALLANGE! (CLOSED) 2.9 years ago

    @catzilla its spotlighted

  • Sealth CHALLANGE! (CLOSED) 2.9 years ago

    @catzilla no. i cant make stealthy planes. neither am i known for stealth. being more noisy than the hillybilly american attack memes so... id lose at once

  • can someone recreate this 2.9 years ago

    i lack the skill

  • can someone recreate this 2.9 years ago

    no

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries AP-29VL 'Cherosprey' 3.0 years ago

    @FeatherWing well its more dedication than my attempts. most planes i make i spend maybe an hour and then say its finished and start on a new model

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries AP-29VL 'Cherosprey' 3.0 years ago

    i must admit. you have improved extremely well with your planes. absolutely amazing.

  • p-400 2.8 3.0 years ago

    @divisor glad to hear. what you can do is using fuselage parts to streamline the wings and use the mirror function to copy all work from 1 side to the other. it should make most of the work much more easier as you dont need to worry about being precise on both sides.

  • p-400 2.8 3.0 years ago

    wouldnt say its a P-400 but close.... you did well but improvements are needed.

  • P-32b lead flinger 3.0 years ago

    its interesting. serving as an interwar plane with a 6 cylinder radial and 4x guns.

  • Prototype 108 3.0 years ago

    oh.... forgot about that.... piss

  • Prototype 108 3.0 years ago

    @99807 did what?

  • M4A4 Sherman 3.0 years ago

    @NotNiki i know. and i try to avoid editing. but everyone has a limit.

  • [TEASER] Messerschmitt 262 3.0 years ago

    @ManManTheWeaponsMan no worries

  • [TEASER] Messerschmitt 262 3.0 years ago

    eeh. image standpoint it looks a bit flattened. maybe some rework on the tail and lowering the cockpit would make it look much more pleasing

  • Citadel 3.1 years ago

    at this rate i wonder if someones gonna make a combine map to destroy

  • He-112 (Light Shark) 3.1 years ago

    bit of a nitpick and thats the wrong gun placement. the He-112 had the option for 2x nose mounted machine guns and 2x cannons [1 per wing] other variants had 1 motor cannon or just the 2x machine guns.

  • i seriously don't know how to call this 3.3 years ago

    Winger Mk I

  • All my unpublished mods 3.3 years ago

    is there any estimated time for the Winterland mod to be finished?

  • AGSRV MA 3.3 years ago

    @Diver then is there any estimated time of the map being completed?

  • AGSRV MA 3.3 years ago

    quite amazing. tho i wonder which map ye took those images at

  • Prototype 17 3.3 years ago

    @bps21 dont belive so. it was mostly meant as a early jet

  • Prototype 95X1 3.4 years ago

    @bps21 the elevators should be free to move. and i have never experimented with multifunctioned wings. but i can give it a go

  • SimpleBiplane (kinda) 3.4 years ago

    not entirely a great war biplane but it is simple

  • F4F-4 WILDCAT 3.4 years ago

    i really like this build. it has potential and ofcourse i have always wondered what would be if they updated the wildcat/martled to take the twin wasp from the hellcat

  • Prototype 14V10 3.4 years ago

    @XKRMilitary nah. i rarely do landing gears

  • Vortex Superheavy 1944 3.5 years ago

    yet again an excellent design

  • Prototype 53 3.5 years ago

    @Aviationfilms109 thanks? i just fiddle around with fuselage parts and get a general shape. any aircraft that comes to interest and i automatically want to make something to rival it. as for the built style. it was just something new

  • Panther M "Lily" 3.5 years ago

    its a cool design. but the tracks 2 version? will that be posted?

  • Prototype 66v2 3.5 years ago

    this uploaded anyway...

  • Realism Aircraft folder 3.5 years ago

    F4F wildcat
    Fw-190
    Bristol Blenheim

  • Mistel Me265/Me265 3.5 years ago

    permission to take the jet and modify it?

  • P-51D-30 Radial engine 3.6 years ago

    now i wonder if the mustang would be as a twin engine fighter. not the F-82 twin mustang. but the simple twin engine, single seat fighter

  • F4U D-30 Mustang 3.6 years ago

    @WholeLottaBread hmm lets see

  • F4U D-30 Mustang 3.6 years ago

    this is an interesting concept. tho i will have to ask why keep the bottom radiator if wing intake is large enough to support the radiators alone.