Profile image

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

101k Wallaby  4.8 years ago
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    101k Wallaby

    @DanishArrasuliZen Bruh #2

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Bruh

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Okay. It was just an idea. @ForeverPie

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    101k Wallaby

    @Boeing777x no

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @ForeverPie Maybe instead of the plane I linked you to, would you like to create a 777XL, a double decker and much larger and higher capacity (900-1300 pax) version of the 777X sometime this summer? Just a yes or no question.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @DPSAircraft It could be due to having the same technologies as the 787.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    It looks kinda like the MD-12, but there are quite a few differences. First of all, the 797 Superliner is significantly larger at approximately 262 feet from nose to tail with a 280-290 foot wingspan, whereas the MD-12 is only 208 feet long and has a 212 foot wingspan. Secondly, the 797 Superliners’s fuselage is circular allowing for a passenger capacity of 1000 or more, whereas the MD-12 is slightly more ovoid with single class capacity of only 800 passengers. Third, the engines on the 797 Superliner are based of the GEnX on the 787, whereas the engines on the MD-12 are smaller and more similar to the engines on the Boeing 747-400. Finally, the 797 Superliner has 32 main landing gear wheels whereas the MD-12 has only 16 main landing gear wheels. Now you might know what I’m saying. @ForeverPie

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    101k Wallaby

    @Boeing777x Thats literally an MD-12

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Numbers To tell you the truth, I'm not really into building planes, especially very complex ones, I just like looking at them. Also, I don't seem to have enough time to build one as I have a program that I go to twice a week, and I also like to spend time with my family. But thanks for the offer though. ;)

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.3k Mostly

    Tasty

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Yes, but it’s noticeably longer and with a larger wingspan, and has a circular fuselage cross section as opposed to the A380’s ovoid fuselage cross section which gives the 797 space for a significantly larger number of passengers. @Numbers

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hello again, check this out. It’s the Boeing McDonnell Douglas 797 Superliner. The plane is approximately 262 feet from nose to tail, has a 280-290 foot wingspan, and single class seating for up to 1000+ passengers. Doesn’t it look cool or what? 😀

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Bo123 That is correct! :)

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Armyguy1534 Me too.

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,018 Kalanimcd

    @ForeverPie me: uses reverse thrust to avoid crashing into tower
    Plane:turns into the j cub from airforceproud's hurricane Matthew video

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    101k Wallaby

    @SaintNPC >:(

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,328 SaintNPC

    @pls stop im duck

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    28.0k Armyguy1534

    that last screenshot is not a good place to be
    im assuming you blew up right after?

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    121k belugasub

    T U B E

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    now THAT, is what I call gear

    +6 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    Yum

    4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,275 UraniumOxide

    I love the fact that when it was about to crash into the tower, it had it's reverse thrusters on. Like that would help.
    M.

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,452 ThatGuySaucy

    M

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.7k Gameboi17

    the new Landing Gear system looks great

    +1 4.8 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments