Profile image

revive B747 or revive Concorde or revive A380

852 DazareAerospace  3.7 years ago

These three are the most popular and iconic masterpieces in aviation history
but unfortunately one of them is no longer in the sky but Boeing 747 and A380s
production stopped. what if we can revive one of them but which one to choose
write in the comments

Jumbo Jet

Queen of the skies

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    That is true......@FeatherWing

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    @MaliciousMuffin
    I wouldn't say that.
    Aircraft like the Bae Lightning and the U2 could fly far higher than 60,000 feet.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Possibly but it wouldn’t be by much because the the Concorde uses air breathing engines so in order to fly higher you would need literal rocket engines and a really really advanced fuselage to handle the altitude @FeatherWing

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    @MaliciousMuffin
    Ok, yes, it did fly up to 60,000 feet, but that was the late 20th and early 21st century. So who knows, maybe redoing Concorde in this day and age, or the future, could allow it to fly higher.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    The Concorde already flew ridiculously high.... I don’t think it could get higher.... the passengers could literally see the curvature of the earth from their windows@FeatherWing

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    @ChrisPy
    1st: Which Military?
    2nd: Militaries are always working on something.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.9k ChrisPy

    It’s possible but you have to change some geometry. And the military has been working on some stuff.@FeatherWing

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    @ChrisPy
    You can't really change the volume level of a Sonic boom...
    Maybe it's a problem that could be solved by being able to fly higher.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    @WarHawk95
    I'm more talking about its fuel consumption problem. The amount of fuel it burned just taxing to the runway is so ridiculous. And we also have far better technology now than we did when the Concorde was designed. So I'm more talking about improving the design.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    (Cough cough.... WHEEZE). A-380-800 for life @Lanc

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    concorde

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    13.9k ChrisPy

    Concorde. We just need to make the sonic boom quieter and the engines quieter. Those things are LOUD. Louder than the 747s flying above my house in DFW

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,816 HelloX

    Concorde

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @WarHawk95 #no but we have to redesign make it fuel efficient, reduce noise, enhance cabin and of course its complicated cockpit.

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.9k WarHawk95

    @FeatherWing @Dazare don't. Redesign. The. Concorde.
    Everything is perfect about it.

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    34.9k WarHawk95

    Concorde definitely.
    And whoever says "change the design" can f*ck off.

    +1 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    @Dazare
    That's what I said...

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @FeatherWing yes concorde is a good option but we have to fully redesign that

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.5k FeatherWing

    It's quite difficult to make a good decision on this.
    Concorde makes the most logical sense (to me at least) in passenger capacity in comparison to the 747 and especially the A380 as you are more likely to sell the most seats at a time, but it consumes wayyy more fuel than the other two.
    .
    The 747 does also have the advantage of being able to be used as a freighter, but as an airliner, it can have the trouble of not selling a lot of seats.
    .
    The A380 just has issues. It's too big for a lot of airports and also has the same issue of selling a lot of seats, having about 500 in total. It also can't be used as a freighter.
    .
    Tbh, with a big rework of the design, I would probably go with Concorde.

    +2 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    747

    3.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Concorde 100%

    +3 3.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.0k TriStar

    747

    3.7 years ago