Current judging criteria :
(might be subjet to changes, credit to @BogdanX for giving me his complete and fair rating system)
Visuals [10 pts]
1. How good it looks (Video game quality to elephant artist paint) [4pts]
2. Livery (overal body painting, realistic colors) [3pts]
3. Details (sensors, fuselage lines, canopy bars etc) and decorations (insignas,
registration text, art, warning signs) [3pts]
Construction [11 pts]
1. Nudging quality [2pts]
2. Smoothness [2pts]
3. Parts efficiency [2pt]
4. Custom elements (LG, weapons, interior, wing airfoil,controls surfaces) [3pts]
5. Structural integrity (collision sounds/issues, disconnected parts, elements
wobbling/bouncing) [1pt]
6. Cockpit view [1pt]
Functionality [10 pts]
1. Plane Stability (auto-roll/yaw/heavy pitching)[3pts]
2. Flaps/Trimming Presence and Functionality [2pts]
3. Takeoff and landing, Ease of flight [2pts]
4. Custom parts functionality (LG, Taxi, weapons,controls, interior
controllers/instruments etc) [3pts]
Historical Accuracy [10 pts]
1. Blueprint match [3pts]
2. Specs match (dimensions, weight, speed)[2pts]
3. Maneuverability (Turn and roll rate, acceleration, glide ratio) [2pts]
4. Specific equipment/features presence and functionality (example: split ailerons
for A-10)[3pts]
Impression [9 pts]
1. Description info (Controls and features explained, Plane data in link or text) [2pts]
2. Amount of effort invested in this build [1pt]
3. Fun factor (how enjoyable was the testing) [1pt]
Completed entries rating :
:`(
@WarHawk95 Good news at last
@Vincent Yep, I restarted working on them since a few days.
Hello, Are you getting anywhere with the ratings? You've been given plenty of time to finish it.
@RamboJutter well I'm working in the army for the moment, miles and miles away from home, so I don't have much time to finish the ratings.
Remember, you made a Morane-Saulnier A1 Parasol... (That earned a magnificent 3rd place for the moment, tie with Ollie)
@WarHawk95 any progress on this? It's been so long I forgot what I had built lol
@TunisianPartisaan Dans le forum épinglé de EternalDarkness, y'a une invitation
@PioThePioneer cheated. Dude literally put 55 fake fuselages to round the part count up to 202 instead of 147, since the minimum part count was 200.
I hope your not sarcastic about the good grade, I hope it did well but I wasn't very happy with the airplane so if it doesn't do great I completely understand. @WarHawk95
@Hedero bruv ofc I'm gonna rate both eh
Also I can tell you your Épervier got a really good grade eh
Will you rate my Vautour? Or only one airplane? @WarHawk95
@asteroidbook345 hehe yeah, I finally closed it
Finally lol
@WarHawk95 👍
@RandomUser09
No, he's BogdanX's food :)
@RandomUser09 oui monsieur ! Et fier de l'être !
@WarHawk95 are you French?
@GroBaleaze thank @BogdanX for that.
This is actually a pretty good list on how to make an amazing aircraft