Title says it all. I have overload, if that matters.
I've tried that and it didn't seem to work quite right. With enough adjusting it might. @mushr0om
@ChaMikey @BaconAircraft thank you
@BaconAircraft it wouldnt have the same performance as it has if you put it without rotator though. still gets the job done.
You cannot. However, you can mount the control surface section on two rotators set to the two inputs desired to simulate it.
@mushr0om I know that.
@LukeDaDuke @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing @BaconEggs @RedHawk thank you for notifying me.
You might be able to place 2 control surfaces inside each other though
No, it can't be done. Not even with xml I don't believe
Nope, it's a succ
Idk, but that would be rly cool
I wish
I've tried that and it didn't seem to work quite right. With enough adjusting it might. @mushr0om
@ChaMikey @BaconAircraft thank you
@BaconAircraft it wouldnt have the same performance as it has if you put it without rotator though. still gets the job done.
You cannot. However, you can mount the control surface section on two rotators set to the two inputs desired to simulate it.
@mushr0om I know that.
@LukeDaDuke @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing @BaconEggs @RedHawk thank you for notifying me.
You might be able to place 2 control surfaces inside each other though
No, it can't be done. Not even with xml I don't believe
Nope, it's a succ
Idk, but that would be rly cool
I wish