Profile image

STOP! It isn't Fair

18.7k F104Deathtrap  6.1 years ago

Stop Comparing The Polikarpov PO2 To Lesser Airplanes

I get it. Everyone loves the Mule. The only biplane to shoot down a jet was also the scourge of the Wehrmacht. Sneakier than a B-2 bomber, she could fly so slow that other planes couldn't shoot her down. Also good gas mileage.

But that is no reason to unfairly compare her to weaker planes from other countries! Everyone knows that the P-51 Mustang is 100% less Russian. There's no need to rub it in.

Let me give you an example. The Amerikansky SR-71 "Black Bird"

Yeah, the black paint is a nice touch. But let's not fool ourselves. This plane is totally inferior in every way. It only has 1/4 as many wings as the PO2, it sucks down gas like... ok nevermind what it sucks gas down like but it's a lot. Ok? If you need to spray pesticides on your potato fields, guess what? No vodka for you. You can't even fly it without the engines (both of them) turned on! Pathetic.

Now let's take a look at this fine example. She has beauty, grace, wheels, what more do you want? Plenty of room for pesticides, looted artifacts, or your friend Igor. Lots of fresh air, too. No cramped interiors on this plane. No sir! Just as much cool, fresh Communist air as you can possibly handle.

Not convinced yet? Perhaps you think you could haul Igor around in an Airbus? Open the doors of an A-350 and sprinkle the crops that way? Sure. You could...

Just look at it. A convoluted mess. The designers couldn't even remember to include a tailgunner position. But worst of all, how would you feel if I told you it needs a road? Don't believe me? Look it up. The A-350 requires its very own kilometer of road that is not only flat but paved just to land. In weak, western nations they euphemistically call these roads "runways." I call it pathetic.

So you see comrades, it's just not fair to compare a steed such as the PO-2 to lowly western aircraft. It degrades the Polikarpov. Be wise, be merciful, think twice.

  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    35.7k Graingy

    It's amazing how obsolete "russia stronk" jokes are now.
    What an uncomfortable relic.
    "soviet stronk" may have some life, though.

    1.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Oh ok@F104Deathtrap

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @CustomAircraftMods God-Hero Lenin is I-16

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    Would that make AN225 Lenin?

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @CustomAircraftMods AN-2 is big brother, like Comrade Stalin.

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    Fair enough, I don’t argue with true Slav
    keep up the good work comrade!
    P.S. I find the Antonov AN-2 a more rugged and better all around Biplane, but that’s just my opinion
    @F104Deathtrap

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @CustomAircraftMods Bloated British plane still need special landing road, Amerikansky plane is mere joke compared to Marvel of Engineering PO-2.

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    Could I compare PO2 to an American Air Tractor? (Which can spread seed over field quicker) :D or to a British Nimrod (which can fly on 1 of its 4 engines) However, on the airbus part, yes, Airbus is superseded by the PO2, and it did give the Germans Nightmares, if it wasn’t attacking them at night :D

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    PO2 spelled backwards is 2 OP

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LancasterAce Fun fact: when they began designing the F-18, they started with a Northrop F-5. Discarding things they didn't like, advancing things they did they eventually reworked the entire design into what we have now. Boeing of course had nothing to do with it at all, Northrop designed the first prototype, then later partnered with Mcdonnell Douglas to improve it. Most of Boeing's fighters are old Mcdonnell Douglas designs, they were true masters of small aircraft design but sadly got eaten up by larger companies.

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @LancasterAce Yes, almost all

    +1 6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    19.7k WaffleCakes

    Igor says that’s how it is

    +1 6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    23.4k marcox43

    even better, why bother on buying fuel when you can run it on vodka?

    +1 6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @ForeverPie Nyet, You see comrade Po-2 can not be shot down, it instead will shoot down F-35 and Harrier both with a single 7.7mm bullet

    +1 6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Well, I actually saw one on flight

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @ForeverPie Imperialist lies, my friend. Do not be fooled by sugar tongued capitalists and their cartoon propaganda.

    +1 6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,142 Hypn0

    nice, you really put the spotlight on the PO-2

    +6 6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Now this information is ours

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    101k Wallaby

    The Harrier and the F-35 can fly slow enough to shoot down the PO-2.

    𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑴𝑶𝑹𝑬 𝒀𝑶𝑼 𝑲𝑵𝑶𝑾

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    35.1k AdlerSteiner

    PO-2 for da win xaxaxaxaxa

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @RailfanEthan yes, UAZ-469.

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @EternalDarkness Good point. Would you say Po-2 is more like UAZ 469 of the sky?

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @RailfanEthan that is a title more fitting An-2, successor to Po-2.

    6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    lol, you need less money to produce Po-2 than to produce a wheel for the Airbus.

    +2 6.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @F104Deathtrap it was actually in a TU 144

    tu144 flashback + Vietnam flashback

    6.1 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments