Profile image

SimplePlanes Logo

25.2k kikasshes  8.6 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Destroyerz117's The simple plane

My interpretation of the SimplePlanes logo plane. Stays faithful to the original top down view and everything else was made up by me. It is based on Destroyerz117's plane because
1. His version gave me the idea
2. I am a lazy person

Controls:
*Land at ~6% throttle (~120mph) with flaps deployed (VTOL up)
*Take off without flaps and be careful with the pitch
I hope you enjoy!

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor The simple plane
  • Successors 1 airplane(s)
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 22.7ft (6.9m)
  • Length 17.9ft (5.5m)
  • Height 9.7ft (3.0m)
  • Empty Weight 5,211lbs (2,364kg)
  • Loaded Weight 5,211lbs (2,364kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 6.467
  • Wing Loading 35.9lbs/ft2 (175.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 145.3ft2 (13.5m2)
  • Drag Points 3108

Parts

  • Number of Parts 41
  • Control Surfaces 10
  • Performance Cost 301
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    Just Ad SP Text On The Top And Boom

    1.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    18.3k Thomasj041

    All the arguing over how this plane is or is not breaking rules, just makes me want to upvote this.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @kikasshes Mind helping me out on the SAS on the tail of my Dash-8?

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    I hate how everyone thinks you copied

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @kikasshes Ok, Thanks! :D

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Other one was crap, thanks for this

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @clayman0 This

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @BaconAircrafts This?

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @kikasshes My i get the link please?

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @BaconAircrafts Do it! Do not hurt my eyes with any other fonts for the sas logo xD

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    @kikasshes Mind if i use your SAS tail for my upcoming airliner? Credit would be given as usual :D

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    :) @ForeverPie

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    101k Wallaby

    @BaconAircrafts ok

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    All good ;) @FrankieB

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @BaconAircrafts it didnt, I'm sorry, that message that I just typed sounded firm :)

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    I didn't mean it in a negative way! Sorry if that offended you; I was just trying to prove a point! :) @FrankieB

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @BaconAircrafts I know, I saw

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @BaconAircrafts

    Thank you!

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    For @clayman0 and other interested people:

    Improvements include but are not limited to:

    • Added gear
    • Added cones at the back of the things hanging from the wings
    • Changed the pylon that was holding said things
    • Changed intake to a giant one
    • Many tweaks to the main body
    • Added infinite fuel
    • Added flaps
    • Changed size of control surfaces
    • Changed the cockpit department
    • Changed the engines power multiplier to 0.7, max input to 0.9 (to disable the afterburner effect) and increased the exhaust size by a factor of 1.5
    • Edited the tail fin
    • Added air brakes

    Please! Look closer before accusing someone of copying! Lots of time was spent tweaking, testing and building this!

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Guys, guys!!!
    He did work, in fact a lot of it. Look at the predecessor and look at this, now fly them. Realize anything kikasshes did? Yes, it may look similar at first glance however, improvements where added; this includes the ability to take off and fly correctly.
    I do not see this as being point hungry, in fact this is a improvement. No rules are broken here. :-)

    @FrankieB @ForeverPie @clayman0

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @clayman0

    This part in the rules is interesting:

    Tweaking airplanes is okay

    1. It is okay to download someone else's airplane, make some tweaks and re-upload a new variation.
    2. In fact, the original designer may even receive bonus points.
    3. However, if your variation does not offer any improvements over the existing airplane, then it may be removed.
    4. If you are circumventing the predecessor/successor system and uploading other people's airplanes without giving any credit to the original designer, then you will be banned.

    Why I am not breaking any rules:
    I think it should be clear that I follow rule 1. I downloaded a plane, made, not some, but many tweaks and additions, even though it may not look like it at first glance, then I uploaded the plane as a suceesor, not breaking rule 4. Therefore, rule 2 applies. One could argue what 'improvements' are (rule 3), but I did add landing gear, so even if you think this plane is worse in every other aspect it at least has the improvement of being able to take off and land.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k FrankieB

    @kikasshes I didn't see what you did at first, but I found it.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @clayman0 Take a look again, but closer.

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k kikasshes

    @ForeverPie @FrankieB Look again. I do not want to be stamped as a copyer when I spent some hours, yes you read right, hours on tweaking this plane, adding stuff and changing things around -.-

    8.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,659 clayman0

    yep@kikasshes

    8.6 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments