Profile image

Blackburn XP-155

322k WinsWings  one year ago
Auto Credit Based on WinsWings's XB-224

Blackburn XP-155

Blackburn XP-155 was a top secret British fighter jet developed during the last years of the World War II, in 1945, powered by 2 Rolls-Royce Derwent 8 centrifugal flow turbojet engine, 3,600 lbf (16 kN) thrust each. This was one of a first British Flying Wing design developed for RAF.

Maximum speed: 600 mph (970 km/h, 520 kn) at 10,000 ft (3,000 m)
Maximum speed: Mach 0.82
Range: 600 mi (970 km, 520 nmi)
Service ceiling: 43,000 ft (13,000 m)

Armament:

  • 4 × 20 mm Hispano MkV cannon
  • eight 5-inch HVAR rockets under outer wings

.
.
.
.

.
Fictional

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor XB-224
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 47.6ft (14.5m)
  • Length 27.0ft (8.2m)
  • Height 8.8ft (2.7m)
  • Empty Weight 5,329lbs (2,417kg)
  • Loaded Weight 10,792lbs (4,895kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.498
  • Wing Loading 23.0lbs/ft2 (112.3kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 469.1ft2 (43.6m2)
  • Drag Points 3058

Parts

  • Number of Parts 109
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 501
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @WinsWings Actually, a Gloster-looking Ho 229 sounds mighty fine as of now.... or a Northrop-looking one, for that matter.
    .
    Also, aside from vertical stabilizers and wingtips, this Allied flying wing design would probably also have large round or square intakes (like the ones shown here), unlike the elliptical monstrosities on the 229.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @ThomasRoderick I was thinking of moving the engines toward the center line of thrust, well, it will end up looking 90% like Horten Ho 229 (except for the presence of the vertical stabilizers and anhedral wing tips. May be I will come up with that design and give a name after you

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @ThomasRoderick That's exactly what you said. Only the Italian one looks flyable to me. The Japanese one could be if it got the larger wing area.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    @WinsWings
    It's the same picture as the one shown there, right?
    ... and among all three models, only the green "Italian" design actually looks flyable, whereas the shovelwing (aka Monarchii's build) is tail-heavy (would've made much more sense to extend the wing all the way back), and this "British" jet incapable of surviving asymmetrical thrust.

    ... and something tells me flying wings also work pretty nicely with split brakes.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @ThomasRoderick Thanks for your input, and YES, knew that once I saw the photo of a fictional model. And no real aircraft might attampt to do so if we think about the force vectors. it is just a "far from reality" fictional.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    The only thing I can think about is the asymmetrical thrust if anything happened to one of the engines... Seriously, it would've looked much more realistic if we moved the nacelles closer to the cockpit.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    10.1k Rb2h

    A whole canon for guns, explodey.

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @HariTheSnakk thanks

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    1,560 HariTheSnakk

    Amazing build.

    10/10

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    29.5k blt

    shoot my meme is too bug

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    29.5k blt

    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣳⢻⣞⣳⢟⣞⣳⢻⣞⣳⣛⡞⣧⢻⡜⣧⣛⣞⣳⢯⡿⣽⣻⢿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣭⡟⣾⣹⢾⣹⣞⡻⣜⢧⡻⣝⢬⣳⣏⡷⣻⢾⡽⣯⣟⡷⣯⢿⡽⣯⢿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣽⣿⣷⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⠿⣿⢻⡟⣿⢻⠿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⡽⣳⣻⣵⣛⣮⡗⣾⣹⢹⢮⡽⣚⣾⣱⢾⡽⣧⢿⣽⣳⢯⡿⣽⢯⡿⣽⣯⢿⣽⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣾⣿⡿⣟⣿⣽⣿⣾⣿⢿⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣻⢯⣟⣷⣻⣭⡿⣝⣯⢾⣽⢫⡿⣽⢯⡷⣻⣞⣳⢯⣞⡽⣣⠷⣞⡽⢶⡽⣲⢣⡟⣾⣱⣟⡾⣽⢯⢿⣽⣻⢾⡽⣯⢿⡽⣯⣟⣷⢯⣿⢯⣷⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⣻⣿⢿⣟⣯⣷⡿⣯⣿⢿⣾⢯⣿⢯⣿⣽⡾⣯⣿⣳⣿⣻⣟⡾⣽⣳⢿⣹⣞⣧⡟⣯⢟⡽⣳⣛⡷⣽⣚⢯⡜⡾⣹⣛⢮⡽⣏⣾⣡⢿⣝⣳⣟⡾⣽⢯⣟⡿⣾⡽⣏⡿⣽⢯⣟⡷⣿⢾⣻⢯⣿⢷⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣿⣷⡿⣿⣽⣿⣻⡿⣽⣟⣿⡽⣿⢾⡿⣽⣻⢷⣯⣟⣷⢯⣷⢯⡷⣯⣟⢷⢯⣻⣧⠿⠞⠛⠛⣞⠷⣧⣛⡼⢣⣛⢮⣽⣳⣧⣛⣮⡽⣎⠷⣯⣛⣾⣳⢯⡿⣽⣻⢾⣽⣳⣟⣽⣻⣽⣯⣟⡿⣽⣿⣻⣟⣯⡿⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣷⢿⣻⣯⣷⢿⣽⣻⣟⣾⢯⣟⣯⡿⣽⢿⣽⣻⢾⡽⣾⣻⣞⣯⠿⣵⣯⡿⠛⣹⣷⣄⣉⣤⣤⡜⣷⠠⣌⣻⣷⡿⡿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣶⣋⡙⣿⡵⣯⢷⣯⢿⣽⣳⣯⢿⣳⣟⣾⢳⣯⣷⢿⡾⣟⣿⢾⡿⣽⣿⣽⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢾⣻⣟⣯⣷⢿⣯⣟⡷⣯⣟⣯⣟⣷⣻⣽⣻⢾⡽⣯⣟⣳⢿⡼⣳⢻⣿⢫⣴⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⠁⠀⡸⣧⣈⠙⢿⣶⣳⣛⣾⣳⡻⣿⣷⣾⣯⢿⣽⣻⣞⡿⣾⡽⣾⣻⣽⣞⣯⢿⣻⣾⣟⣿⣟⣯⣿⢿⣟⣷⣯⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⡿⣯⢿⣽⣾⣻⢾⣽⣻⢷⣻⢾⡽⣞⡷⣏⡷⢯⣻⡵⢾⡹⣞⡽⣣⣿⢥⠫⣍⢻⣿⡿⠿⢿⣧⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⡄⢸⣿⣿⣿⣼⣽⣴⣿⣿⣻⣯⣟⣾⣳⣯⢿⣳⣿⣻⣽⢷⣾⡽⣿⣟⣷⡿⣽⣾⢷⣿⣿⣻⣯⣷⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣳⣿⣻⣟⣾⣳⢯⣟⡾⡽⣯⣛⡷⣛⢷⣛⢾⡹⣏⢷⣹⢳⡻⢼⡱⣳⣿⡟⡱⡜⣸⡟⣁⠢⠀⠌⠁⠀⠈⢻⡏⠁⢈⠀⢹⣿⣿⣻⢿⣯⢿⣽⣷⡿⣞⣯⣿⣻⣯⣷⢿⣯⣷⢯⣿⣻⣾⣯⣿⣟⣯⡿⣷⣿⡿⣽⡷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣞⣷⣻⢾⡝⣟⡾⣝⣻⣵⣫⣝⢯⡳⣝⢮⡳⣝⣎⣳⢫⡝⣣⢓⣿⣿⣷⡥⣣⢘⣀⣄⣁⣈⠐⠀⠤⠀⠸⡗⠨⠀⢈⣠⣿⣿⣽⡿⣽⣯⣿⣿⣽⣟⣯⣷⣿⣽⣾⣿⣻⣾⣻⣷⣿⣻⣷⢿⣽⣾⣿⢿⣷⡿⣿⣽⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢾⡽⡾⣭⢷⡻⡽⣞⡭⢷⣎⠷⣎⢷⣙⠮⢧⢳⡜⢦⢣⢧⡹⢬⣹⣿⣿⣿⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣦⣤⣤⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⢿⣳⣯⣿⣿⣞⣿⣽⣾⢯⣿⢾⡿⣽⡷⣿⣯⣷⣿⣯⣿⣿⣻⢾⣿⣻⣽⣿⣯⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡳⣟⣽⢳⣏⢷⡻⣼⢹⡳⣎⠷⣎⡳⢎⣏⢳⢣⠞⣡⠏⢦⠓⡧⢼⣿⣿⡿⢶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣷⢯⣿⣷⢿⣻⡾⣟⣿⣻⣟⣿⣽⣿⣻⣽⣯⣷⣿⢾⣿⣻⣿⣻⣻⣟⣾⣿⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣹⢞⣮⣛⡼⣣⢟⣬⢳⡱⢎⡳⣌⢧⢓⡬⢃⡇⢎⡱⢊⢇⣋⠶⣩⣿⣿⣿⣧⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣽⣿⣻⣯⣿⣯⡿⣾⣿⣿⣟⣿⣯⣿⣟⣿⣞⣷⣯⣿⢿⣯⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣜⣯⢶⣹⡼⣵⣫⣖⣧⣝⣮⣱⣬⣎⣦⡵⣭⡼⣦⣵⣻⢮⣷⣻⡷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣷⡿⣯⣿⣟⣷⣻⣽⣷⣿⣯⣿⣿⡷⣿⢾⣿⣾⣿⣽⣿⢿⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣞⣭⡿⣽⣽⣳⣟⡾⣳⣛⠾⣵⢳⡞⣷⣻⢳⣟⣳⢯⣟⣻⣞⣿⡽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣯⣿⣟⣿⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣽⣞⡿⣻⢾⡿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢚⡳⣛⠷⣯⡻⣜⣳⡭⣏⢿⣼⣫⣽⣳⢟⣯⣽⣻⣿⣻⣿⣽⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⣻⣽⣟⡿⠋⠛⣉⣙⣯⣷⣻⢾⣹⡽⣏⣿⣹⢏⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢈⢧⣵⡿⣳⢟⡭⡷⡽⣞⣻⢶⣫⡷⣽⣻⡿⣾⣯⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣏⣟⣻⣷⣛⣻⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣿⣿⣿⡷⣿⡿⠋⢀⠴⠋⢤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣷⣻⡽⣮⣟⡽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡼⣟⣳⢟⡳⣏⣿⡳⣟⡽⣞⣯⣷⣿⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⣿⣿⣞⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣻⣽⣿⣾⣻⢿⣟⡿⣷⡿⠛⠁⠄⢊⠀⣆⢁⣾⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣯⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢵⣻⡽⣾⢻⣽⣮⣷⣿⣻⣿⣿⣽⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⣿⣯⣿⣯⣷⣿⣿⣿⢷⣿⡻⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⢻⡏⠐⠀⠀⠀⠼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡞⣷⣽⣾⡿⣯⢿⣽⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣻⡽⣯⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣟⣫⠭⣭⢝⣛⣛⣛⣛⣛⣛⣿⣿⣯⣿⢿⣻⡽⣞⡿⣺⡽⣿⣿⢹⡷⣯⢿⠃⠀⢀⡖⠁⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣾⢿⣯⣷⢿⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣹⣿⣻⣿⣿⡿⣽⣿⣜⡛⢻⣿⡭⣟⡼⣏⢯⡻⣝⣯⡟⣯⢷⣫⡞⣯⡟⣷⡹⣗⢯⡳⣿⣿⠏⣼⡿⣽⣻⣠⡴⣾⢀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
    ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣽⣿⣳⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    Ah Yes, The Flying Wing Of UK

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    Looks great, flies ok, and functions good. A cockpit interior would have been nice, though. Not too great for dogfighting.

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @Trainzo Thanks

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    47.5k Trainzo

    Very nice plane .

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    36.0k Speedhunter

    Ooooh a flying wing~

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @TTL @MrCOPTY

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @windshifter1 @XPA @MicroZack1220

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @HanakoSan @ToeTips @Rainbowdash247

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @oldmate52 @TheAviator77 @FatPilotOne

    one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @MonsNotTheMonster @Boeing727200F @ZacOnTrack

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image
    322k WinsWings

    @Hahahahaahahshs Ha ha ha ha ha

    one year ago
  • Profile image

    Dang, beat me to it!

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    Also why are the aileron inverted

    +1 one year ago
  • Profile image

    Funny plane is here

    +1 one year ago