You make no sense. If Someone makes a challenge with the intentioj to earn points for themselves and others, then it clearly is not meaningless. The second part isn't 100% true either. Often times, good designs go unrecognized simply because people didn't find them interesting enough.
No, it's not. Simply because one makes a video, doesn't make a plabe their's. What really matters is the statistics that show all the little special values that make a plane unique. If you compare these numbers and thise of @Cjredwards , you'll find that they're the same, which proves that this dirty kid stole Cj's design and is trying to claim it as his own. @derpy
1. I'd rather not soil my eyes with such GARBAGE. 2. It really isn't more successful. Practically every plane I've made was more successful than this stolen piece of property. Maybe if you had an ounce of talent, you wouldn't be copying @crackers34
This is what i'm talking about. So many parts to this are wrong. The wings are shaped wierdly, the way the engines are placed at the back is wrong, the engines placed in the main body need to be concealed, and it's lacking a central engine divider. Don't take all this to harshly. It's just honest criticism
Nobody really makes these as well as you do. Keep up the good work. Sorry about those scrubs tryin' to steal your plane and claim it was their own design.
No! You didn't get any ideas. All you did was steal @Cjredwards 's Su37 and repaint it. Just look at the stats for both planes...O wait THEY'RE THE SAME!😡@crackers34
Maybe this will help you... Don't repost without substantial changes. Neither you nor that anonymous person made this. This is the property of @Cjredwards and should be treated as such. You should be ashamed of yourself
Sooooo agile. The wings could use a little bit of editing to make them more realistic, but that's just esthetics. I like how you tried to make the engines. Only downsides are the relatively lower speed compared to ither top end fighters which exceed 1000 mph and the downward tilt. Maybe you could add thrust vectoring... But that's just my opinion
Love the way it looks. From the tip of the needle to the end of the tail, it's beautiful. Especially like the paint. However, this thing performs well, and what I would assume to be realistically. I almost landed it on the USS Jundroo. All it needs are airbrakes
Thank you. You've truly taught me something important. Sometimes, lesss is more. I know that now. The only drawback is the fact that that little front landing gear isn't retractable. PERFECTED
Mind blown! Looks like we have a new master builder
@Gault where is this pun u speak of
You make no sense. If Someone makes a challenge with the intentioj to earn points for themselves and others, then it clearly is not meaningless. The second part isn't 100% true either. Often times, good designs go unrecognized simply because people didn't find them interesting enough.
Srsly? This is a mediocre design. It pales in compaison to so many others and you call it the "best jet you will ever fly." BAH
I've only expected the best fom you. To this day, I haven't been disappointed. Keep up the good work
My name is Allstarship
Not bad
Meh, proportions are a bit warped. Not too bad though
Just... No
Far better than anything i can do! WELL DONE! This thing's detail is off the charts
Theis doesn't deserve space on the hottest list
More for me
This is just too good
Ooooohhhhhhhh! Ok@Ambarveis
Stellar job. Looks awesome!
I guess i was wrong. My apologies @Scriefers @Geebers
LET IT BE KNOWN THAT IT WAS I, ALLSTARSHIP, WHO MADE SCRIEFERS HIT THE 4,000 POINTS MARK BEFORE ANYONE ELSE! Congratulations
No, it's not. Simply because one makes a video, doesn't make a plabe their's. What really matters is the statistics that show all the little special values that make a plane unique. If you compare these numbers and thise of @Cjredwards , you'll find that they're the same, which proves that this dirty kid stole Cj's design and is trying to claim it as his own. @derpy
1. I'd rather not soil my eyes with such GARBAGE. 2. It really isn't more successful. Practically every plane I've made was more successful than this stolen piece of property. Maybe if you had an ounce of talent, you wouldn't be copying @crackers34
@Ambarveis How so?
Actually, they're AGMs (Air-to-Ground) and they aren't missiles, they're bombs
Wings are off
This is what i'm talking about. So many parts to this are wrong. The wings are shaped wierdly, the way the engines are placed at the back is wrong, the engines placed in the main body need to be concealed, and it's lacking a central engine divider. Don't take all this to harshly. It's just honest criticism
@crackers34 i feel like i just got brain damage from reading your rating
Loads of fun to use
I see your game... You can't hide your dirty dealings from me@Geebers
Great plane
You know it@XWING
'Twas love at first sight
I'm sorry if my post mid-led you, but I'm pretty sure there isn't a p51challenge...
Very few f-16s around here... Nice job
Noice
Nobody really makes these as well as you do. Keep up the good work. Sorry about those scrubs tryin' to steal your plane and claim it was their own design.
No! You didn't get any ideas. All you did was steal @Cjredwards 's Su37 and repaint it. Just look at the stats for both planes...O wait THEY'RE THE SAME!😡@crackers34
Oops. My bad @Thebrendon55c
Can i post an "air-start" plane?! It won't have landing gear, meaning that you'll have to start in the air@Thebrendon55c
Why thank you @AndrewGarrison @maverickvii @TheGorgeousMina
Not even yours. This belongs to @Cjredwards
Maybe this will help you... Don't repost without substantial changes. Neither you nor that anonymous person made this. This is the property of @Cjredwards and should be treated as such. You should be ashamed of yourself
Sooooo agile. The wings could use a little bit of editing to make them more realistic, but that's just esthetics. I like how you tried to make the engines. Only downsides are the relatively lower speed compared to ither top end fighters which exceed 1000 mph and the downward tilt. Maybe you could add thrust vectoring... But that's just my opinion
Y have u summoned me?
Love the way it looks. From the tip of the needle to the end of the tail, it's beautiful. Especially like the paint. However, this thing performs well, and what I would assume to be realistically. I almost landed it on the USS Jundroo. All it needs are airbrakes
@MarsocCunt What do you mean, finally finished? This isn't that great and it looks nothing like an F22😐
That someone would be me. I think I'll accept your challenge
Soooo much fun
Go ahead and make a profile so we can see more of your great planes
It's so stable. That slight backwards tilt is easily mitigated, and it's flight is so smooth. Easily one of the best VTOLs yet!
Thank you. You've truly taught me something important. Sometimes, lesss is more. I know that now. The only drawback is the fact that that little front landing gear isn't retractable. PERFECTED
Dude, honestly.. Don't ask for stars. This thing is quite unstable, but that's to be expected
Just perfect