48.2k AntonWings Comments

  • Vought F4U-1D "Corsair" 1.8 years ago

    @BogdanX
    Thanks for your comments.
    As always, thank you for your perceptive points.
    I was aware of the problem of the directional instability during takeoff and landing. However, I could not find the cause and could not fix it. Thanks for pointing out the cause.
    Your various pointers and advice are helpful. If you have any other areas for improvement or good points, I would be glad to hear them.

    +1
  • Vought F4U-1D "Corsair" 1.8 years ago

    @WinsWings
    Thank you for your comment.
    And I am so glad you spotlighted this piece!Thank you so much :)

    +2
  • Vought F4U-1D "Corsair" 1.8 years ago

    @HuskyDynamics01
    Thank you for your comment.
    I am honored to hear you say that :)

    +2
  • Vought F4U-1D "Corsair" 1.8 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer
    Thank you for your comment.
    I always have a lot of trouble when creating the fuselage behind the canopy.

    +1
  • Vought F4U-1D "Corsair" 1.8 years ago

    @SonsoftheMoth
    Thanks for the comment! Thanks for taking a look at my other works :)

    +2
  • Vought F4U-1D "Corsair" 1.8 years ago

    @kiji
    @Timplanes
    @Mustang51
    @PapaKernels
    @Seaplanerider030805
    Thank you all for your comments.
    I am glad I could make a "corsair" that you all think is good.

    +2
  • Junkers Ju-87 B-2 "Stuka" 1.8 years ago

    @pancelvonat
    Thank you very much.
    I am glad that you noticed the detailed ideas in my work. If you have the opportunity to use this technique in your future work, please do so.

    +2
  • Junkers Ju-87 B-2 "Stuka" 1.8 years ago

    @WinsWings
    @AlbertanPlaneMaker
    @asteroidbook345
    @SilverStar
    Thanks for your comment.
    I wanted to reproduce the siren as well. I knew this mod existed. But I am a mobile user and could not use the mod.
    I hope they will release parts related to sound. It would expand the possibilities of the work.

    +4
  • Junkers Ju-87 B-2 "Stuka" 1.8 years ago

    @BogdanX
    Thanks for the comment.
    You are right, it could have been better with suspension on the landing gears. But I wanted to minimize the number of parts used. I did not feel that it would interfere with the landing, and it would not affect the appearance significantly, so I decided to omit the suspension.

    +1
  • Hawker Hurricane Mk.1A 1.9 years ago

    @Kangy
    Thank you! Your warm comments are encouraging:)
    The pace is slow, but I will continue to make better builds.

    +3
  • Henschel Hs P.75 1.9 years ago

    @Jaspy190
    You ask a strange question....totally unrelated to this piece....
    But I will answer it. However, I am neither a language expert nor a flower expert. I will answer only as a personal opinion.
    As far as I know, there are no abbreviations in the Japanese translation of azalea flowers. Azalea flowers are called "ツツジの花(tsutsujinohana)" in Japanese.
    Incidentally, the abbreviations "ouka" and "toka" that you gave as examples are rarely used by modern Japanese in daily conversation.

  • Pusher Aircraft Challenge [CLOSED] 2.0 years ago

    @WinsWings
    Thank you for choosing my piece for third place! I am happy because I didn't think I could win a prize.
    This was my first time participating in the Challenge. It was a very fun challenge. I also enjoyed looking at the other participants' works that were submitted one after another.
    I look forward to seeing what the next competition will be like. Thank you very much.

    +1
  • Henschel Hs P.75 2.1 years ago

    @WinsWings
    The challenge you created made it possible for me to create this piece. Thank you.

    +2
  • Henschel Hs P.75 2.1 years ago

    @Timothy19452022
    You like P-51?
    Try this.

    +1
  • Henschel Hs P.75 2.1 years ago

    @Ownedpilot
    Thanks for the comment. My work was made possible because of the current version of SP, which has more features such as slicing the fuselage, etc. You are amazing for making such a beautiful Hs P.75 four years ago.

    +1
  • Henschel Hs P.75 2.1 years ago

    @Jaspy190 @Dragoranos
    Thanks for the comment. Thanks also for the request. I will consider it.
    @Skam
    Thankyou so much :)

    +1
  • Pusher Aircraft Challenge [CLOSED] 2.1 years ago

    @WinsWings
    Thank you!

    +2
  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.1 years ago

    @Alexandrovv
    Sorry for the very late reply.
    Thank you for your wonderful offer.
    However, I have no plans at this time to build any other planes that will appear in "Sky Crawlers". Even if I receive the PDF data, it may be wasted.
    If I want to make a plane that appears in "Sky Crawlers" in the future, please let me contact you.

  • Pusher Aircraft Challenge [CLOSED] 2.1 years ago

    @WinsWings
    I submitted a piece to be entered in the Challenge.
    Henschel Hs P.75
    Please let me know if there are any problems with how to participate. I hope you like it.

    +1
  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.1 years ago

    @WinsWings
    Thank you very much!! :)

  • Pusher Aircraft Challenge [CLOSED] 2.1 years ago

    @WinsWings
    Thank you very much. If I can create a good build that I am comfortable with, I will post it the way you taught me.
    This is my first time participating in the Challenge, so please let me know if I am making any mistakes.

    +1
  • Pusher Aircraft Challenge [CLOSED] 2.1 years ago

    @WinsWings
    I too like pusher type airplanes and would love to participate in this challenge.
    Is it correct that all I have to do to participate in this challenge is to download this post and submit my own work based on it?

    +1
  • Bristol Beaufighter TF Mk.X 2.1 years ago

    @ShinyGemsBro
    Thanks for your comment.Thanks for the upvote too.
    I will endeavor to make more less parts builds in the future so you can fly it.

    +1
  • Bristol Beaufighter TF Mk.X 2.1 years ago

    @RolandTelmsFrossag @Shugie @GoldenSidewinder @Jaspy190 @2700kMoogie @CN0703
    Thankyou so much! :)
    @Elorus
    Thanks for your translation.

    +3
  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @BogdanX
    Sorry for the late response.
    Thank you very much for your very thorough explanation.
    I am looking forward to the tutorial video you mentioned before, but first I will install an appropriate text editor on my mobile (I play on an Android device) and try the method you described.
    I would appreciate any further advice you can give me.

  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @林副统帅
    I will tell you frankly.
    I have changed my mind. I will not make A6M yet. Because the A6M is a special aircraft for me, and I want to make it after I improve my skills a little more. Sorry for being moody. But the work I make without enthusiasm will not be a good one. That's my theory.

  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @BogdanX
    Thank you for your response. I see, you are using a text editor to replace the XML description. That was helpful.
    Thanks also for the tutorial video creation. It is very helpful and I am sure there are many other SP users who can be helped by that video besides me.
    I already follow your account. I look forward to the completion and publication of the tutorial video.

  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    Uploaded v2 with additional aileron trim function. There is a link to v2 at the top of the description column.
    I wanted to update the XML file, but for some reason it failed, so I am uploading it this way.

  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @BogdanX
    Thank you very much for your advice. It is very helpful.
    I have one very elementary question. You said "mass edit the xml file with all parts having calculateDrag set to false." Is it possible to mass edit the XML of the parts?
    I always use OverLoad Mod to edit the XML of the parts one by one.
    Or, if I want to set Mass Scale to all 0, for example, the fuselage parts of a wing section, I set MassScale of the fuselage part of the wing foundation to 0, and then build the wing from that part by "adding sections", so that all parts have MassScale of 0.
    If you know of any other easier way to do batch editing, I would appreciate it if you could let me know.

  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @BogdanX
    @Rodrigo110
    This is my view as the creator of this plane.
    I intended to make this plane symmetrical. The fact that it autorolled means that there is a problem with my work and that the left and right sides are uneven. I should have either corrected this non-uniformity or given the pilot the ability to adjust the roll axis.
    Well, I am now working on a version that allows roll axis adjustment with VTOL input. I will update the XML file when completed.
    However, it will not have trim tab visualization. This is because I could not find out where the Sanka trim tabs are and what shape they are.

  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @FalcoOne
    If you can read the "Sky Crawlers" series in your native language, please do so.
    It may be a little poetic and difficult to understand in some parts, but it is a good work. My personal recommendation is "None But Air". It is the oldest story in the series. There are episodes that take place shortly after Sanka was deployed in actual warfare. I think the content is also easy to understand.
    The animated movie is also a good work, although the taste is a little different from the novel. If you like airplanes (and of course you do), the beautiful aerial battle scenes are worth seeing.

  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @BogdanX
    Thanks for the advice.
    You make an astute point...I was aware of the roll glitches and lack of trim reproduction that you pointed out. You seem to have spotted that I am lazy in details....
    I will try to reproduce details and deal with minor glitches as best I can in the future when I do my work.

  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @IceCraftGaming
    @Samflugzeugpanzer
    @WinsWings
    Thank you so much!!

    +1
  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @Ian_Yashima
    Thanks.
    I also saw your photo on your twitter. I think ASBE's work is excellent as seen in your photos. I am looking forward to seeing it completed :)

    +2
  • Thanks for 10k 2.2 years ago

    @Bryan5
    Congratulations on reaching 10K :)

    +1
  • Rostock Sanka-Mk.B (from"The Sky Crawlers") 2.2 years ago

    @MrShenanigansSP
    Well, J-2 Skyly is also good. It might be a good idea to build one for dogfighting with Sanka.

    +2
  • Ilyushin Il-2 mod. 1943 (M-82) Shturmovik 2.2 years ago

    You are a builder I admire, and once again you have shown us a wonderful build with remarkable realism and originality. Great work!!

    +1
  • Lockheed P-38 L Lightning 2.3 years ago

    @Kangy
    Thank you so much for your thorough description, I really appreciate it!
    I understand it very well. I see, so that's why most WW2 fighters have black nose tops.
    I have never tried discord before. When I have a little more time on my hands, I might give it a try. I would be very happy to have your advice then :)

    +1
  • Lockheed P-38 L Lightning 2.3 years ago

    @Ash158474060908
    I think it might be fixed by setting "Physics" to "Medium" or higher in "Setting" -> "GameQuality" of the game.
    Maybe if the Physics is too low, the physics will not be calculated properly and the tires will roll into the ground. I don't know why. Sorry.

  • Lockheed P-38 L Lightning 2.3 years ago

    @ChiChiWerx
    Thank you so much!

  • Lockheed P-38 L Lightning 2.3 years ago

    @Kangy
    Thankyou!
    What is an Anti-Glare panel? If possible, I would appreciate it if you could point me to a website that would tell me what it is. Sorry for my lack of study.

  • Lockheed P-38 L Lightning 2.3 years ago

    @GabrielSatori @Dragoranos
    Thankyou!!

    @GabrielSatori
    Oops, I forgot to fix it. Thanks for pointing that out.
    I updated the XML file and fixed the bug.

    +1
  • Lockheed P-38 L Lightning 2.3 years ago

    I cannot reply to all comments (see profile for details).
    Also, I will be posting my work less frequently. Sorry.

  • Kawasaki Ki 100-1 Type5 Fighter 2.3 years ago

    @林副统帅
    Sorry, I am not a Chinese speaker, so let me answer in English.
    Thank you for your request. I have already started to create a US aircraft now, so I will create A6M next time I create a Japanese aircraft.

  • Kurogane Type95 ScoutCar 2.3 years ago

    @ChamDel78
    Thanks for making the new version. It's quite avant-garde :)

    +1
  • Kurogane Type95 ScoutCar 2.3 years ago

    @jamesPLANESii
    Thank you very much!
    I'm glad to hear you say that.

  • SP Mod Taxi 2.3 years ago

    Wow, that's some awesomely vivid coloring!
    And the color change makes it much prettier....
    And thanks for increasing the capacity, Andrew must be pleased :)

  • Kurogane Type95 ScoutCar 2.3 years ago

    @ChamDel78
    Thank you!! :)

  • Kurogane Type95 ScoutCar 2.3 years ago

    @ChamDel78
    Yes, it is.

  • Kurogane Type95 ScoutCar 2.3 years ago

    @OTOjustGoose
    Thank you so much!

    +1