You are in no place to judge the maturity of others if you are unable to demonstrate maturity and rational thinking yourself. Leave the guy alone. If you have a problem with him, use the block feature. The way I see it, this is simply picking on a guy to stir up drama, and is simply unacceptable. @TheCommentaryGuy
That’s a tough one… orthographic drawings for the CRJ are just not common nor of high quality on the open internet. You’d just have to use lots and lots of reference images to make out the shape, unfortunately. There’s usually more info on the 7/9/1000.
Very nice mobile friendly regional pencil of the canada variety.
.
Just some feedback. (Of course with mobile friendly low parts approach in mind)
The Good:
Wing shape is representative.
The -100/-200 doesn't have slats, it didn't fool you!
The stubby tail is stubby, the shape is pretty representative.
Slight Inaccuracies:
The windshield is a bit too big. The drawing you used appeared to be scanned using a radish so I cant blame you. On the actual (-100 through -1000), a window sill exists between the skin and the glass, which is mistakenly depicted as glass in the reference.
The wing-fuselage fairing is misshaped. The top of the fairing sits flush-ish with the fuselage. You may achieve that using Hard for the top 2 corners. In addition, the front of the fairing "blends" into the wing smoothly (for all AC -100 through -1000), while the rear "half" protrudes from the wing and the slight bump-out houses the gear (zoom in). The "halves" are only visible from underneath, and appear to be smooth and as one from other angles (especially the -1/200 due to lack of slats, approaches slightly nose-down vs. 7/9/1000).
The engine nacelles are shorter and more rounded. Again the drawing referenced isn't clear, not your fault.
The inboard spoiler is for lift dump, and pops automatically (if primed) when sufficient pressure is felt on the gear. The outboard spoilers are multi-functional.
Suggestions:
For little additions to partcount (<30 ish) you could think about including these details.
Aforementioned window sill, colour it metallic.
Outline doors and covers, or simply show where they are with the metallic scuff plate.
Little APU heat shield plate and hole on the side of the tail (2 parts).
Metallic leading edge.
Flat hinge fairings.
Canadair/Bombardier/(Mitsubishi if you're a rebel) logo under the aftmost cockpit glass panel.
Pretty plane. The interior details on this are pretty funny.
The seat labeled L A N D I N G G E A R in case you're curious what you're sitting on gave me a chuckle. Also, what is that tiny little prop on the tail supposed to be?
I mean sure... the post is correctly marked as off-topic... but...
You know what, you win on this one. I have no clue what I've just read and what to do.
@ZEROandSAYOU Your comment is unacceptable in reference to the guidelines. Please provide constructive criticism and not a pointless insult.
@FlyingBathtub Please do not pour fuel on fire. Making another pointless comment in an already unnecessary argument is not needed. Just ignore it and move on.
@Sabertoothyt526 Please read the rules regarding proper comment and community guidelines. If you do not appreciate what is said about your build, you may block the user, remove the comment, or report it. There is absolutely no need to continue an argument; they get nothing out of an insult, and nor do you. Please proceed situations like this with maturity.
.
All three of you will receive a strike this chain of comments are absolutely unnecessary. If you have a problem with someone or something, simply move on - they didn't punch you or anything.
The post itself while not directly violating the rules, is questionable for removal for the following reasons:
- Spam - The build is not beneficial to the community in a meaningful or technical way. As art, it is extremely low effort. Meanwhile as a flag part, it is excessively big, contains comically large amount of drag, collisions, etc; and not practical in any way.
- Politics - While a flag is not violating any of the rules, the intention and concept of this post appears to be insincere. Evidently so, this is not built as a "high quality" flag for sub-assemblies, and in today's political climate is subject to drama in the comments. It suggests that it was almost made as a means to instigate comments and debate; which is not acceptable. If this is not the case, please let me know.
- Comments - While this is not on the author, the comments resulted from this post (partially due to the aforementioned points above), is absolutely unacceptable. These comments are debate about politics and off-topic subjects that are undeniably against site rules. It will not be tolerated regardless of political standing. These pointless bickering is simply not needed.
If you think any of the aforementioned points contain mistakes in understanding, or and any other comments regarding the removal of this post, feel free to let me know. I am open to discussion.
The thing is for this one, and a similar one by another user is that, (opinion follows) the painting is clear enough to depict, but not photorealistic enough to be used to deceive people. Of course, we don’t know the author’s intention, nor do I want to baselessly accuse anyone. I think an average user of the site would be capable to see the thumbnail as a painting or an artistic depiction, and understand it’s not a screenshot per se. Of course if this becomes a problem in the future, something would be put in to prevent it. However, for the time being I think we don’t need to assume people have ill intent, and we can let people have a bit of artistic freedom.
Hello Walvis,
After careful consideration and an in-depth review of your skills, assets and talents, we regrettably inform you that you do not meet the criteria for this opening.
Please see the following reasons
- Lack of relevant industry experience (10 year at minimum).
- Insufficient stature for education (Master's degree in mechatronics, systems, aerospace engineering or equivalent).
We wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors.
Best regards,
Talent acquisition
People, people...
.
Please keep the comments civil. There is no reason to bash the author. If you think it breaks the rules, report it and move on. Like it or not, the author has the right to remove your comments.
.
That being said...
The complaints do have merit. While I don't think this is misleading intentionally to the point of breaking the rules, I definitely do understand the concerns. I understand the thumbnail is an artistic render of the build, but it cannot be ignored that some key features have been altered to improve or change the appearance. This could be interpreted as misleading for some. I think this is in a grey area of what is allowed and what isn't. While I don't think it will be removed for now, please be more considerate in the future, and create thumbnails that more accurately reflect the build.
.
In addition, please improve your attitude to the feedback. If you don't like what people say, block and report. There is no need for snarkly replies and passive aggressive comments. I hope you can demonstrate you are more mature than your replies suggest.
If you make changes to someone’s work, no matter how little or significant the modifications or additions may be, the auto-credit should be used. Purposely ignoring the auto credit system is plagiarism. End of story. Full stop.
.
The only valid exception would be utilizing someone else’s sub-assembly on your clean-sheet build, such as a missile or a HUD. Please consult the author of the parts for usage.
@FirstFish83828 Excellent.
May I ask what are the changes you've made compared to the original? I am confused.
+4This is very interesting.
+1Chad Canadian aircraft enjoyer.
Well done.
skil ishyu
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Feel free to re-upload with a thumbnail showing the actual build, not a photograph.
No politics please. I don’t want to hear it.
This is not “harassment” - this is a tonk, stop reporting it as such.
Link? @FlyingBathtub
+1Not sure. Will ask about it. @Hiimakeplanes
Skill issue. /s @WolfHunter9111
+2Done.
+2Pleb phone skill issue. @MrSilverWolf
I agree. Permanent will do. @Dathcha
+2Here, you dropped the H. You forgor. @MrSilverWolf
+2You are in no place to judge the maturity of others if you are unable to demonstrate maturity and rational thinking yourself. Leave the guy alone. If you have a problem with him, use the block feature. The way I see it, this is simply picking on a guy to stir up drama, and is simply unacceptable. @TheCommentaryGuy
You forgor about ｃａｍｂｅｒ @FairFireFlight
Good. @jamesPLANESii
That’s a tough one… orthographic drawings for the CRJ are just not common nor of high quality on the open internet. You’d just have to use lots and lots of reference images to make out the shape, unfortunately. There’s usually more info on the 7/9/1000.
@DARZAVIATIONOFICIAL
Very nice mobile friendly regional pencil of the canada variety.
.
Just some feedback. (Of course with mobile friendly low parts approach in mind)
The Good:
Slight Inaccuracies:
Suggestions:
Dear lord.
So is this what unlimited defense budget feels like?
+7@IceFairy I see. Evidently pirating kimi no na wa requires the ram air turbine to be operating at full capacity.
+1Pretty plane. The interior details on this are pretty funny.
+1The seat labeled L A N D I N G G E A R in case you're curious what you're sitting on gave me a chuckle. Also, what is that tiny little prop on the tail supposed to be?
@ReignSUPREME I don't see a problem. Go ahead.
Also, absolutely beautiful livery.
Very cool.
+1Now that is out of the way, may I interest you in the ways of the funky tree for a 4 small payments of 49.99?
Off topic exists... but this is so far off the deep end. It is simply irrelevant to the community.
Anything is a launch rail or mounting hardpoint for if you put your mind to it. ;)
+4Lol. I think the correct joke name would be the De Havilland Canada Dash-8 Q001
+4@Fish83828 No. 6.
@Fish83828 When I roll 7 on my daily morning single dice roll.
@DatRoadTrainGuy19 Yes.
I mean sure... the post is correctly marked as off-topic... but...
+7You know what, you win on this one. I have no clue what I've just read and what to do.
@ZEROandSAYOU Your comment is unacceptable in reference to the guidelines. Please provide constructive criticism and not a pointless insult.
@FlyingBathtub Please do not pour fuel on fire. Making another pointless comment in an already unnecessary argument is not needed. Just ignore it and move on.
@Sabertoothyt526 Please read the rules regarding proper comment and community guidelines. If you do not appreciate what is said about your build, you may block the user, remove the comment, or report it. There is absolutely no need to continue an argument; they get nothing out of an insult, and nor do you. Please proceed situations like this with maturity.
.
All three of you will receive a strike this chain of comments are absolutely unnecessary. If you have a problem with someone or something, simply move on - they didn't punch you or anything.
你们仨有完没完啊？
@bbbddd @kuaishoumengyi @167167
The post itself while not directly violating the rules, is questionable for removal for the following reasons:
- Spam - The build is not beneficial to the community in a meaningful or technical way. As art, it is extremely low effort. Meanwhile as a flag part, it is excessively big, contains comically large amount of drag, collisions, etc; and not practical in any way.
- Politics - While a flag is not violating any of the rules, the intention and concept of this post appears to be insincere. Evidently so, this is not built as a "high quality" flag for sub-assemblies, and in today's political climate is subject to drama in the comments. It suggests that it was almost made as a means to instigate comments and debate; which is not acceptable. If this is not the case, please let me know.
- Comments - While this is not on the author, the comments resulted from this post (partially due to the aforementioned points above), is absolutely unacceptable. These comments are debate about politics and off-topic subjects that are undeniably against site rules. It will not be tolerated regardless of political standing. These pointless bickering is simply not needed.
If you think any of the aforementioned points contain mistakes in understanding, or and any other comments regarding the removal of this post, feel free to let me know. I am open to discussion.
The thing is for this one, and a similar one by another user is that, (opinion follows) the painting is clear enough to depict, but not photorealistic enough to be used to deceive people. Of course, we don’t know the author’s intention, nor do I want to baselessly accuse anyone. I think an average user of the site would be capable to see the thumbnail as a painting or an artistic depiction, and understand it’s not a screenshot per se. Of course if this becomes a problem in the future, something would be put in to prevent it. However, for the time being I think we don’t need to assume people have ill intent, and we can let people have a bit of artistic freedom.
@PaperPlaneHasDream
+3Eh, I think it’s in the grey area. @ANNYUI
+2…
Though I don’t encourage this going forward. It could potentially be misleading, situation depends.
Link me the original post please. :) @Swisweaponsfactory
/s @Walvis
+4@RandomSPGuy Nah, you gotta think more adventurous than that. 6 yearold me envisioned a whole aircraft carrier for them.
+4Mmmm 172S... Finally, a worthy opponent. Our battle will be legendary!
+3/s /s
~
Very very very beautiful replica. Nailed the shape!
What are you smoking and where can I get some?
+8@Vincent Skill issue.
+1People, people...
+3.
Please keep the comments civil. There is no reason to bash the author. If you think it breaks the rules, report it and move on. Like it or not, the author has the right to remove your comments.
.
That being said...
The complaints do have merit. While I don't think this is misleading intentionally to the point of breaking the rules, I definitely do understand the concerns. I understand the thumbnail is an artistic render of the build, but it cannot be ignored that some key features have been altered to improve or change the appearance. This could be interpreted as misleading for some. I think this is in a grey area of what is allowed and what isn't. While I don't think it will be removed for now, please be more considerate in the future, and create thumbnails that more accurately reflect the build.
.
In addition, please improve your attitude to the feedback. If you don't like what people say, block and report. There is no need for snarkly replies and passive aggressive comments. I hope you can demonstrate you are more mature than your replies suggest.
@MrOofington Provide a link please.
+1@SyntheticL Dealt with. Please use report feature next time.
+3Use the report feature instead. @EpicBullDog
If you make changes to someone’s work, no matter how little or significant the modifications or additions may be, the auto-credit should be used. Purposely ignoring the auto credit system is plagiarism. End of story. Full stop.
.
The only valid exception would be utilizing someone else’s sub-assembly on your clean-sheet build, such as a missile or a HUD. Please consult the author of the parts for usage.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
With all due respect,
+13I need to apply some un-see potion directly to forehead.