Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here. Completely off the deep end in off topic. I did it for you.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here. This is off topic and not related to the SP website.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Dragorans No. Enough; I've gotten 6 of these in the past day asking for successor edit. Take the effort to upload it as a successor, it only takes a few minutes.
May I ask, does the said seat satisfy the US Department of Transport FAA Advisory Circular No 20-146A for the Methodology for Dynamic Seat Certification by Analysis for Use in Parts 23, 25, 27, and 29 Airplanes and Rotorcraft?
.
The AC No 20-146A sets forth an acceptable means, but not the only means, for demonstrating compliance with title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) §23.562, 25.562, 27.562, and 29.562, as well as Technical Standard Order (TSO) TSO-C127a, and TSO-C127b. Thusly includes guidance for certifying seats by computer modeling analysis techniques that are validated by dynamic tests. Please verify that the said seats designs meet these predefined requirements, and adequate analysis and qualification testing are performed to meet the requirements put forth.
.
/s
@xNotDumb Please use your judgement. I think we both know what's considered off topic or spam. Refrain from wasting your own time as well as mine.
Thanks.
@xNotDumb
Please refer to the rules and use your judgement. This is extremely off topic and not needed on the site. We allow a wide variety of uploads that are not actually airplanes. However, we do reserve the right to remove posts if they are too far off-topic.
@asteroidbook345 Thought about it at some point. Moving h. stab. up was not worth the troubles of funky over wing turbulences and vortices and the elusive d e e p s t a l l.
For context, the project requirement essentially was to design a 4-8 passenger STOL transport with some ridiculously short takeoff and landing requirements. ...which is why this chonky boi is hilariously overpowered in the propulsion department and has Y E S wing area.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here.
This is not appropriate in the context displayed. By itself, the hardware is fine. However, when you apply it in a setting like this, it can be provocative and may have controversy attached to it. We should not be seeking to mock such situations or joke about anything related to firearms in educational institutions, including and not limited to making slight references to school shootings - whether or not if it was intended. You will not be striked, but take this as a warning please.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
This is why some of the discord servers are not on the list. If you saw this in any server on the list, please let us know immediately.
+5Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Marionette551 Considering that I left more than ample reason in your post, please refer to it and read it.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here. This is exceedingly off-topic.
@Vincent Little swede brain cannot comprehend the absolute scale of this ))
+9牛。
+9skill issue smh /s
+7Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
We've been trying to reach you about your Tomcat's extended warranty.
+11Title changed to YONDA to avoid possible copyright issues with the monkeys over at *ONDA.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here. Completely off the deep end in off topic. I did it for you.
+1@JustAGuy001 God, you really didn't read any of that didn't you.
@CRATE52PART2 That was Dorian, I shall pass on your thanks.
+7hons
You may not like this, but this is what peak performance looks like.
+15Bruh.
+2Tag changed to off-topic.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here. This is off topic and not related to the SP website.
You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.
+9Oh wow, its not a dumpster fire. Surprising. Lets keep it that way comrades.
+11Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
/s
+13Darn, the Airbus C-Series and Mitsubishi CRJ acquisitions are hitting Bombardier quite hard if they have to resort to manufacturing beetles. Smh.
+7/s
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@Dragorans No. Enough; I've gotten 6 of these in the past day asking for successor edit. Take the effort to upload it as a successor, it only takes a few minutes.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
May I ask, does the said seat satisfy the US Department of Transport FAA Advisory Circular No 20-146A for the Methodology for Dynamic Seat Certification by Analysis for Use in Parts 23, 25, 27, and 29 Airplanes and Rotorcraft?
+7.
The AC No 20-146A sets forth an acceptable means, but not the only means, for demonstrating compliance with title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) §23.562, 25.562, 27.562, and 29.562, as well as Technical Standard Order (TSO) TSO-C127a, and TSO-C127b. Thusly includes guidance for certifying seats by computer modeling analysis techniques that are validated by dynamic tests. Please verify that the said seats designs meet these predefined requirements, and adequate analysis and qualification testing are performed to meet the requirements put forth.
.
/s
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@xNotDumb Please use your judgement. I think we both know what's considered off topic or spam. Refrain from wasting your own time as well as mine.
Thanks.
f l a t
b
+3mmmmmmm dassault goes brrrr
@xNotDumb
Please refer to the rules and use your judgement. This is extremely off topic and not needed on the site.
We allow a wide variety of uploads that are not actually airplanes. However, we do reserve the right to remove posts if they are too far off-topic.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@spefyjerbf
+1T h e
e x t r u s i o n
o f
a
v e r t e x
l e a d s
t o
a
c u s p
.
@Aviator01
+2range: 820km +80
fuel efficiency: y e s (specific fuel consumption of approx. 0.61 [1/hr])
@asteroidbook345 Thought about it at some point. Moving h. stab. up was not worth the troubles of funky over wing turbulences and vortices and the elusive d e e p s t a l l.
+2For context, the project requirement essentially was to design a 4-8 passenger STOL transport with some ridiculously short takeoff and landing requirements. ...which is why this chonky boi is hilariously overpowered in the propulsion department and has Y E S wing area.
@SyntheticL Yes yes
+1@UltraLight Yeah lol. Its funny, and sad.
+5Changed to Hunda to avoid :b:onda getting angry that someone used their brand name.
+1Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here.
This is not appropriate in the context displayed. By itself, the hardware is fine. However, when you apply it in a setting like this, it can be provocative and may have controversy attached to it. We should not be seeking to mock such situations or joke about anything related to firearms in educational institutions, including and not limited to making slight references to school shootings - whether or not if it was intended. You will not be striked, but take this as a warning please.
Thank you.
+1sum ting wong
+4@Supreternity 你说谁呢？
@Cope No they're not. You should know better than to group everyone into the same category.
+1