The post itself while not directly violating the rules, is questionable for removal for the following reasons:
- Spam - The build is not beneficial to the community in a meaningful or technical way. As art, it is extremely low effort. Meanwhile as a flag part, it is excessively big, contains comically large amount of drag, collisions, etc; and not practical in any way.
- Politics - While a flag is not violating any of the rules, the intention and concept of this post appears to be insincere. Evidently so, this is not built as a "high quality" flag for sub-assemblies, and in today's political climate is subject to drama in the comments. It suggests that it was almost made as a means to instigate comments and debate; which is not acceptable. If this is not the case, please let me know.
- Comments - While this is not on the author, the comments resulted from this post (partially due to the aforementioned points above), is absolutely unacceptable. These comments are debate about politics and off-topic subjects that are undeniably against site rules. It will not be tolerated regardless of political standing. These pointless bickering is simply not needed.
If you think any of the aforementioned points contain mistakes in understanding, or and any other comments regarding the removal of this post, feel free to let me know. I am open to discussion.
If you make changes to someone’s work, no matter how little or significant the modifications or additions may be, the auto-credit should be used. Purposely ignoring the auto credit system is plagiarism. End of story. Full stop.
.
The only valid exception would be utilizing someone else’s sub-assembly on your clean-sheet build, such as a missile or a HUD. Please consult the author of the parts for usage.
Funny enough that was almost entirely accidental. I dropped the clip into the video track, positioned it, turned the speed to x2 and it literally just so happened to line up. @goboygo1
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Just a friendly reminder...
Keep politics out of the comments section or you will receive a strike.
~
Also, please consult a list of anhedral, high wing, T-tail, quad engine transports before accusing XXX a copy of YYY... If you design an apple you can't get an orange. People are free to build what they wish without getting harassed.
I've turned the comments off earlier. But from the response I've been getting, I think it may be inching a bit close to politics. Unfortunately I will have to remove this to prevent further dumpster fires popping up here and there.
Alright lads...
Just to let people know, this is NOT against the rules. There is nothing in the rules that state you can't upload a blocky car.
~
Also those complaining about upvotes... upvotes are worthless internet points. Please calm yourselves and organize your thoughts. We don't need insults on this. People are free to upload whatever they wish, as long as it abides by the rules.
~
If further drama ensues, it will be dealt with accordingly. Please behave yourselves.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Make snarky and borderline inflammatory comments rather than addressing in a civil manner
Escalates unnecessary drama amongst 3 users
Received warning via comment
Received another warning on profile
Blatant attacks and insults at moderators
Received strike
Why was I given a strike?!
I think there is no further discussion needed. There are plenty of comments posted already and I do not think drama and unnecessary issues like this are beneficial. The less the better.
That's really interesting. The background the AI generates is quite amazing, and it would take little effort to photoshop the build onto the AI generated, or I guess "improved" background.
I really do not want to spend my time to deal with childish posts like this. We have been light on your actions does not mean you can do whatever you want. Please grow up.
Beautiful video... but just a question to be the devil's advocate here. Would the canard fore of the wing mounted in this low of a position disrupt the airflow to the wing at high AoAs? I would imagine a low pressure zone forming right aft of the canard in such maneuvers, and low pressure at the bottom of the main wing is generally not so good for a wing to be... well a wing. There's also a possibility that you might have deep stall issues found on T-tail aircraft with this, except with both of your wing and horizontal control surfaces losing authority. Also vortices and vibrations might be a problem. Cool concept regardless.
As much as it is a saddening accident, and I understand you made this with good intentions, memorial posts are not permitted per site rules. You may wish to make a post to the forums instead.
No sympathy posts or memorial posts. Move those discussions to the forums.
Hey, you may wish to ask some of the more experienced mod makers on this. As much as I want to help, the mod stands for moderator and not mod maker, I am probably not the right one to ask. @Deandash
你们仨有完没完啊？
@bbbddd @kuaishoumengyi @167167
The post itself while not directly violating the rules, is questionable for removal for the following reasons:
- Spam - The build is not beneficial to the community in a meaningful or technical way. As art, it is extremely low effort. Meanwhile as a flag part, it is excessively big, contains comically large amount of drag, collisions, etc; and not practical in any way.
- Politics - While a flag is not violating any of the rules, the intention and concept of this post appears to be insincere. Evidently so, this is not built as a "high quality" flag for sub-assemblies, and in today's political climate is subject to drama in the comments. It suggests that it was almost made as a means to instigate comments and debate; which is not acceptable. If this is not the case, please let me know.
- Comments - While this is not on the author, the comments resulted from this post (partially due to the aforementioned points above), is absolutely unacceptable. These comments are debate about politics and off-topic subjects that are undeniably against site rules. It will not be tolerated regardless of political standing. These pointless bickering is simply not needed.
If you think any of the aforementioned points contain mistakes in understanding, or and any other comments regarding the removal of this post, feel free to let me know. I am open to discussion.
Link me the original post please. :) @Swisweaponsfactory
Use the report feature instead. @EpicBullDog
If you make changes to someone’s work, no matter how little or significant the modifications or additions may be, the auto-credit should be used. Purposely ignoring the auto credit system is plagiarism. End of story. Full stop.
.
The only valid exception would be utilizing someone else’s sub-assembly on your clean-sheet build, such as a missile or a HUD. Please consult the author of the parts for usage.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@StugnaATGM Of course.
Make sure it abides by the successor and/or rules of the site and you're good.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Yeah that is true.
About it being utilitarian tho… I can neither confirm nor deny.
@Bellcat
Uh, no, what makes you think that? @Bellcat
Funny enough that was almost entirely accidental. I dropped the clip into the video track, positioned it, turned the speed to x2 and it literally just so happened to line up. @goboygo1
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Just a friendly reminder...
Keep politics out of the comments section or you will receive a strike.
~
Also, please consult a list of anhedral, high wing, T-tail, quad engine transports before accusing XXX a copy of YYY... If you design an apple you can't get an orange. People are free to build what they wish without getting harassed.
Fellas, keep the comments civil.
This is a J-10. It is a pretty airplane. Leave your politics at the door, I don't want to hear it.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@Chancey21 anhedrals are factually superior. There is no further discussion.
I smell missile candidate.
@XspacePoopHisPants1 @XspacePoopHisPants1 Guys... really... some things are better kept to yourselves.
I've turned the comments off earlier. But from the response I've been getting, I think it may be inching a bit close to politics. Unfortunately I will have to remove this to prevent further dumpster fires popping up here and there.
@jamesPLANEScdxxLXIX or not releasing them at all!
Anyways, breaks are good. Take a rest here and there.
Alright lads...
Just to let people know, this is NOT against the rules. There is nothing in the rules that state you can't upload a blocky car.
~
Also those complaining about upvotes... upvotes are worthless internet points. Please calm yourselves and organize your thoughts. We don't need insults on this. People are free to upload whatever they wish, as long as it abides by the rules.
~
If further drama ensues, it will be dealt with accordingly. Please behave yourselves.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Please keep discussions civil, or it will be removed.
Thanks.
Not related. This post has been closed.
Idk I was bored.
.
Credits to MrSilverwolf for the plane. https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/024sK3/SkyWolf-SE-VII
squa-
B U L B U S . The curves are excellent! Well done.
The shots following "More shots at night (with illumination):" looks like a CATIA V5 rendering lol.
Done. @Questionmark
Skill issue. 🅱️ @MrSilverWolf
I think there is no further discussion needed. There are plenty of comments posted already and I do not think drama and unnecessary issues like this are beneficial. The less the better.
Please actually read the strike notes... I encourage you.
Thank you.
That's really interesting. The background the AI generates is quite amazing, and it would take little effort to photoshop the build onto the AI generated, or I guess "improved" background.
Go right ahead. @SyntheticL
I really do not want to spend my time to deal with childish posts like this. We have been light on your actions does not mean you can do whatever you want. Please grow up.
@DatRoadTrainGuy19
Beautiful video... but just a question to be the devil's advocate here. Would the canard fore of the wing mounted in this low of a position disrupt the airflow to the wing at high AoAs? I would imagine a low pressure zone forming right aft of the canard in such maneuvers, and low pressure at the bottom of the main wing is generally not so good for a wing to be... well a wing. There's also a possibility that you might have deep stall issues found on T-tail aircraft with this, except with both of your wing and horizontal control surfaces losing authority. Also vortices and vibrations might be a problem. Cool concept regardless.
Done. @ShinyGemsBro
Please make an effort to utilize the successor system next time. Thanks. @MrOofington
ｊｕｎｋ用在这里跟垃圾的意思一点关系也没有。
多学点儿英文少骂人好不好？
@gard @UMR1
@Bellcat legs was taken off my 86 walker
bacon oeuffs havin a skill issue I see (((
bonus 1
bonus 2
@KendJello 老哥您有完没完呀？差不多行了。
Sigh... If you know the rules explicitly mentions it, then why do it?
@Y1nx
有话好好说行么？
@FoxtrotCharlieCharlieX oops
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
As much as it is a saddening accident, and I understand you made this with good intentions, memorial posts are not permitted per site rules. You may wish to make a post to the forums instead.
No sympathy posts or memorial posts. Move those discussions to the forums.
This is probably fine. Plus, it’s old enough that it predates that rule. @ThatOneRoadTrainBuilder19
Hey, you may wish to ask some of the more experienced mod makers on this. As much as I want to help, the mod stands for moderator and not mod maker, I am probably not the right one to ask. @Deandash