It looks like it came out of a 1955 science fiction movie (which is not necessarily bad). The air intakes, however, seem to be stuck to the plane almost by force, and do not flow harmoniously. The aesthetics of wings and tail planes do not melt at best, the wings do not have any sweep back, while the tail plans have too much. The coloring, although without any excellent points, is decent. Some refinements such as paneling or evidence of tanks or other openings would have been welcome.
Weaoibs: 4/5
There is a huge amount of assorted armaments. The plane has mainly a vocation to attack the ground and anti-ship, but also has some anti-aircraft weapons. There is a machine gun, to finish the job if needed. However, there are no countermeasures, unfortunately, and then we lose a point in the judgment that could have been 5/5. Accomplice the parameter "flight" (see below) means that against targets such as destroyers each attack is suicide.
Takeoff: 2.5 / 5
The plane is a little under-powered, and this is reflected, as well as on the "flight" parameter (see below) also on take-off. Furthermore, the biggest problem is the two vertical drifts that have an excessive downward encumbrance. This leads them to hit the track with some ease. In addition, the rear landing gear, a little too short, tends to detach from the track if you roll too long to gain too much speed. And when it rotates, it causes the tail to fall violently.
Flight: 2.5 / 5
Decent roll, but absolutely insufficient agility on the vertical direction. The plane is difficult to nose up because of the center of gravity that is too advanced compared to the lifting center. It's also very slow, we're not talking about just subsonic, but about 470 mph at about 500 feet of altitude. There are no aerodynamic brakes.
Landing: 1/5
Made very difficult by the laziness in the maneuvers and the rear wheels too high, as mentioned above.
The wings, the tail planes and the vertical fin are 3D. The intention was good, but the aesthetic result is poor, they only look like big pieces placed in a disharmonic way. They are not tapered, and the chosen section is not the best. Furthermore, the plan form is also not the best one.
The colors have not changed from the basic model, and the situation worsens.
The two engines are placed unrealistically. The wings also flex and peep out of the fairing that makes them three-dimensional.
It can be done better.
Armament: 1/5
4 Hell and 6 Boom25
4 of the 6 bombs are dropped regularly, but 2 get stuck in the fuselage. Sometimes you can make them fall with a sudden maneuver, other times they explode destroying the plane.
The only way to test the plane without bombs is to release them on the runway before take-off.
There are no countermeasures.
Take-off: 2/5
It takes off with a lot of difficulty, probably because the landing gear is too far behind the center of gravity and hinders rotation.
Flight: 2/5
Slow, we are just over 400 mph, and very lazy. Both with the bombs on board and without the plane reacts slowly and very limited to maneuvers. There are no aerodynamic brakes,
Landing: 0/5
Given the laziness of the plane, its slowness and the limited amount of fuel it is impossible to take off, align with the track and land. Every mission is a suicide mission.
Sorry for the strict but honest judgment. TOTAL 7/25
@DerpyCookie17 OK, do it, but no longer than a week, because I want to keep back my hobbies soon, SP included. :) And I reserve myself the opportunity to apply a point penalty for the overtime publication.
@DerpyCookie17 I hope so... The sad work to dismount all the mom's and dad's house is near to end, and then I will start again with my hobbies. I think the maximum dead end is the end of october.
@DOX Play for your fun, and do not care of attention, or ask yourself what is "wrong" in your planes and use the lack of attention as "test" to improve.
@DOX really not, I already was studing rotors for underwater propulsion, I only adapted speed rotation and blade pitch for maximize speed. Really I spent very few time on this tournament, due to the lost of my mom. Still have no time for sp, I hope at the end of october, or at the start of november I will keep back my life, sp included.
@DOX no, it's rotator based. There are 4 rotators that start when no AGs is selected (or at least, when the choosed AG is not selected) and move some "propeller" made of wings. The phisic engine for the real propeller engines (T1000, T2000 and T3000) has a code limit at 760 mph, but this is not a propeller engine, so it bypass the software limit, and can reach any speed. BTW over this plane's speed I sperimented unwanted shaking, and the speed rise by itself at 3500+ mph and the plane become uncontrollable.
@Watlel I have no dubt about it. I don't think to be the first. But I think not too much peoples shared this "discover" with others. So, now some builder know it. And this was my intention. :)
@Typhlosion130 @josef733 @SuperSanic @Hockeygoalie21 thanks mates. I really enjoyed spectate the tournament chatting with all you, a very relaxing time.
We are in a match and your plane deserve to win more than mine (mine had a fatal issue when on enemy line) but I fear I will be on the "player" one and i'm afraid of this.
@Hockeygoalie21 my old shaker (glitch plane) winned the past tournament with a 24 seconds time. My new rotor based non-shaker plane do the course in 22 secons, so I think glitch planes are no longer the meta.
And I had no time to develope it. I think the limit for the rotor based is more or less 15 seconds.
@Nerfenthusiast Thanks. I have to empty my parents house, because I must give it back to proprety empty and in good state, so my week ends are completely busy untill end of october
@Tessemi I have no dubt about it. I don't think to be the first. But I think not too much peoples shared this "discover" with others. So, now some builder know it. And this was my intention. :)
@Chancey21 BTW I had zero time to develope mine, so I'm pretty sure that I'm not going to win. :) It's fast, but with two weeks for develope the plane someone faster than me will win.
@Roswell I have no dubt about it. I don't think to be the first. But I think not too much peoples shared this "discover" with others. So, now some builder know it. And this was my intention. :)
@Derplord365101 nope, only one of two engines is mass 0 but I added it later, only because with only one the acceleration was slow, and I had to test it quickly in various tests, and the gear, also, added in a second edit for more tests (and I didnt want to move COM)
@randomusername Yep, this or more bigger wings does more resistence when rolling they find air on the big surface. Or more far from COM is the air resistence when rolling. A lot of ideas have sense in real life, but I fear we are so far from real life that the phisic engine does strange things.
@atgxtg Yes, the same if you intentionally do not affect weight. The roll become a little more faster, but not so different (probably the mass is more near the COM).
@etrain5544 Thanks lot mate. Sadly 6 month agò was my dad, and now my bro and me must do a lot of things, like empty the house that is rented, close all contracts for water, gas, electricity, telephone, sell what we can and call a company that will free us of the remaining .. unfortunately all tasks not only sad, but also demanding long time. And of course, to deal with the idea of parents both gone away.
Aesthetics: 3/5
It looks like it came out of a 1955 science fiction movie (which is not necessarily bad). The air intakes, however, seem to be stuck to the plane almost by force, and do not flow harmoniously. The aesthetics of wings and tail planes do not melt at best, the wings do not have any sweep back, while the tail plans have too much. The coloring, although without any excellent points, is decent. Some refinements such as paneling or evidence of tanks or other openings would have been welcome.
Weaoibs: 4/5
There is a huge amount of assorted armaments. The plane has mainly a vocation to attack the ground and anti-ship, but also has some anti-aircraft weapons. There is a machine gun, to finish the job if needed. However, there are no countermeasures, unfortunately, and then we lose a point in the judgment that could have been 5/5. Accomplice the parameter "flight" (see below) means that against targets such as destroyers each attack is suicide.
Takeoff: 2.5 / 5
The plane is a little under-powered, and this is reflected, as well as on the "flight" parameter (see below) also on take-off. Furthermore, the biggest problem is the two vertical drifts that have an excessive downward encumbrance. This leads them to hit the track with some ease. In addition, the rear landing gear, a little too short, tends to detach from the track if you roll too long to gain too much speed. And when it rotates, it causes the tail to fall violently.
Flight: 2.5 / 5
Decent roll, but absolutely insufficient agility on the vertical direction. The plane is difficult to nose up because of the center of gravity that is too advanced compared to the lifting center. It's also very slow, we're not talking about just subsonic, but about 470 mph at about 500 feet of altitude. There are no aerodynamic brakes.
Landing: 1/5
Made very difficult by the laziness in the maneuvers and the rear wheels too high, as mentioned above.
Final Judgment: TOTAL 13/25
@CptJacobson OK. Simply leave a little credit if you reuploaded it. :)
@CptJacobson How do you want to use it?
Finally I get my life back and start to judge. The result are on the original escape pod.
Thanks for your time, your patience and your entry
@AvroPilot B-23
Aesthetics: 2/5
The wings, the tail planes and the vertical fin are 3D. The intention was good, but the aesthetic result is poor, they only look like big pieces placed in a disharmonic way. They are not tapered, and the chosen section is not the best. Furthermore, the plan form is also not the best one.
The colors have not changed from the basic model, and the situation worsens.
The two engines are placed unrealistically. The wings also flex and peep out of the fairing that makes them three-dimensional.
It can be done better.
Armament: 1/5
4 Hell and 6 Boom25
4 of the 6 bombs are dropped regularly, but 2 get stuck in the fuselage. Sometimes you can make them fall with a sudden maneuver, other times they explode destroying the plane.
The only way to test the plane without bombs is to release them on the runway before take-off.
There are no countermeasures.
Take-off: 2/5
It takes off with a lot of difficulty, probably because the landing gear is too far behind the center of gravity and hinders rotation.
Flight: 2/5
Slow, we are just over 400 mph, and very lazy. Both with the bombs on board and without the plane reacts slowly and very limited to maneuvers. There are no aerodynamic brakes,
Landing: 0/5
Given the laziness of the plane, its slowness and the limited amount of fuel it is impossible to take off, align with the track and land. Every mission is a suicide mission.
Sorry for the strict but honest judgment. TOTAL 7/25
Here I am, finally. Sorry for the delay, but life rip me apart from simpleplanes and basically all my hobbies.
From now I can judge the planes, and I wil do from today.
@DerpyCookie17 OK, do it, but no longer than a week, because I want to keep back my hobbies soon, SP included. :) And I reserve myself the opportunity to apply a point penalty for the overtime publication.
@DerpyCookie17 I hope so... The sad work to dismount all the mom's and dad's house is near to end, and then I will start again with my hobbies. I think the maximum dead end is the end of october.
What is the difference from original? (eccept paintjob, obviously)
@DOX Play for your fun, and do not care of attention, or ask yourself what is "wrong" in your planes and use the lack of attention as "test" to improve.
+2@Watlel My youtube channel is not videogame related, it will be absolutelly out of place. :)
@DOX really not, I already was studing rotors for underwater propulsion, I only adapted speed rotation and blade pitch for maximize speed. Really I spent very few time on this tournament, due to the lost of my mom. Still have no time for sp, I hope at the end of october, or at the start of november I will keep back my life, sp included.
@DOX no, it's rotator based. There are 4 rotators that start when no AGs is selected (or at least, when the choosed AG is not selected) and move some "propeller" made of wings. The phisic engine for the real propeller engines (T1000, T2000 and T3000) has a code limit at 760 mph, but this is not a propeller engine, so it bypass the software limit, and can reach any speed. BTW over this plane's speed I sperimented unwanted shaking, and the speed rise by itself at 3500+ mph and the plane become uncontrollable.
@Watlel I have no dubt about it. I don't think to be the first. But I think not too much peoples shared this "discover" with others. So, now some builder know it. And this was my intention. :)
@DOX The problem is not made it fast, but made it not shaking and pass trough the rings.
@Chancey21 Yes, you also was developing rotators, and your speed pushed me to develope more.
@marcox43 Thanks mate. I searched a way to enter a "non-shaker" plane, and the rotors was the way.
@AndrewGarrison ahahaha... thanks Andrew.
@Typhlosion130 @josef733 @SuperSanic @Hockeygoalie21 thanks mates. I really enjoyed spectate the tournament chatting with all you, a very relaxing time.
And belive me, I'm sorry for eliminate you. :)
@Chancey21 Your plane was a really good one. in the first four, I think.
+1@Chancey21 I wish you too. :)
@AndrewGarrison freezed
We are in a match and your plane deserve to win more than mine (mine had a fatal issue when on enemy line) but I fear I will be on the "player" one and i'm afraid of this.
+1@AndrewGarrison problems?
@Hockeygoalie21 my old shaker (glitch plane) winned the past tournament with a 24 seconds time. My new rotor based non-shaker plane do the course in 22 secons, so I think glitch planes are no longer the meta.
And I had no time to develope it. I think the limit for the rotor based is more or less 15 seconds.
@Nerfenthusiast Thanks. I have to empty my parents house, because I must give it back to proprety empty and in good state, so my week ends are completely busy untill end of october
@Tessemi I have no dubt about it. I don't think to be the first. But I think not too much peoples shared this "discover" with others. So, now some builder know it. And this was my intention. :)
@Chancey21 nope, I tested them but are too much critical.
@poopatron71 thanks mate, good job with the contest.
@Chancey21 BTW I had zero time to develope mine, so I'm pretty sure that I'm not going to win. :) It's fast, but with two weeks for develope the plane someone faster than me will win.
@Chancey21 hehehe... I will do. I was already exploring the rotors performance, but I will.
@poopatron71 Thanks lot mate.
@Roswell I have no dubt about it. I don't think to be the first. But I think not too much peoples shared this "discover" with others. So, now some builder know it. And this was my intention. :)
+1@JohnnyBoythePilot it seem more a dolphin... or better, I think we can do a flying dolphin, now.
+1@Chancey21 nope, I didnt. I hope that now, with the creation relased, more peoples will know it. :)
@Derplord365101 nope, only one of two engines is mass 0 but I added it later, only because with only one the acceleration was slow, and I had to test it quickly in various tests, and the gear, also, added in a second edit for more tests (and I didnt want to move COM)
@atgxtg I'm going bed now (It's late in italy) and I have very few time in this days sadly.
@AndrewGarrison Did you know this?
@randomusername Yep, this or more bigger wings does more resistence when rolling they find air on the big surface. Or more far from COM is the air resistence when rolling. A lot of ideas have sense in real life, but I fear we are so far from real life that the phisic engine does strange things.
+1@atgxtg @AceOfSpade thanks for the upvote for this ugly plane. :) I hope you upvoted the idea... xD
@atgxtg try and write it to us, I'm interested to know.
@randomusername nope, it become faster in this built (I tried only this)
@atgxtg Yes, the same if you intentionally do not affect weight. The roll become a little more faster, but not so different (probably the mass is more near the COM).
Wonderfull
Anche tu dall'italia, mi pare di capire. :)
@robloxweponco not hard, really... a "Minus" sign can solve everything.
@etrain5544 tanks lot from all us
@robloxweponco it's a kind of magic 😉
@etrain5544 Thanks lot mate. Sadly 6 month agò was my dad, and now my bro and me must do a lot of things, like empty the house that is rented, close all contracts for water, gas, electricity, telephone, sell what we can and call a company that will free us of the remaining .. unfortunately all tasks not only sad, but also demanding long time. And of course, to deal with the idea of parents both gone away.