@AnoniMosu I'm sorry if I write it in not clear english language (my english suck, I know) but I mean "p-47 propeller" that was used in a lot of different engines.
@Christopher2106 I must add a explaination: There is NO mobile surface, so TRIM is useless to balance the ship, unless you made the right manual adjustments. The VTOL thrusters are not mobile. They point only down, and the horizontal component is added with another engine.
@Christopher2106 the VTOL slider are set to center from autopilot. It does not work beter than TRIM as precision of tuning, but make it incompatible with IA.
@ChiChiWerx Yes, I tried 450, 600, 800 and 1000 Hp options, and the two better are 450 and 1000. The first is slow and majestic, but a bit unbalanced and hard to fly. The last is fun to fly around the islands, and is "simple", as the game is born. :D
@ChiChiWerx :) Thanks. Really is not "drag" but "friction", due the nature of item (it's an half sphere, and I raised the friction on 1000% if I'm not wrong) So the drag in air is 0, and when it touch it slow down and keep the plane in line.
Yes, is faster, but I chosed to relased it at 1000 HP. Setting it at 450 HP you will see how was the 2nd alternative.
Actually I understood very well. Mine was "irony" (do you know what it is?)
I was wondering why you had not done one of these two things, if the creation in your opinion was inappropriate: Report it as such (which would have been perfect, since it would have made it appear right under the nose of Andrew Garrison) or ignored completely if not You were in agreement with the chosen method.
And give an eye to my creations, and wonder if I need the few points of this... especially as already platinum.
@ballisticbullets Just tried. :( The idea is beautifull, but sadly the T1000 sound is at least 10 times louder, and cancell any other old prop. I tried to put it directly under the cockpit, to hear the sound at least in first person view, but... no way. :( But good attempt.
@Chancey21 I cant help you, in the tournament there was not. My advice is to publish it anyway as an entry, it will be interesting to see and in the worst case you will make a second without that system.
@Chancey21 The father of this is the winner of the ONLY glider tournament ever made by jundroo, and I asked to put it as "Propulsion method", but AndrewGarrison let this be legal. :) So I winned, and this, at least for Jundroo, is not a propulsion method but a high tech glider.
@kaaraabiner Simply copy and paste the url of the plane, I will copy and paste in the browser. :)
@kaaraabiner Oh... please, link it to me. I'm courious
nice to see this again, I have a deja vu :P
@kaaraabiner Thanks lot, mate.
+1@Carbonfox1 Unarmed as original, i think.
@Carbonfox1
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/812702/C-C-2-WORK-IN-PROGRESS
@Carbonfox1 MMmmmh... You just give me the idea. I can do a replica of C.C.2. :)
@Carbonfox1 The C.C.2 was a tecnological demostrator more than a plane with a pourpose. :)
@ThePrototype Thanks for the information that I was unable to find. I only found the date. So, against a very performing fighter plane...
@AnoniMosu I'm sorry if I write it in not clear english language (my english suck, I know) but I mean "p-47 propeller" that was used in a lot of different engines.
@BigBoiPlanes thanks 😊
@Christopher2106 I must add a explaination: There is NO mobile surface, so TRIM is useless to balance the ship, unless you made the right manual adjustments. The VTOL thrusters are not mobile. They point only down, and the horizontal component is added with another engine.
+1@Christopher2106 the VTOL slider are set to center from autopilot. It does not work beter than TRIM as precision of tuning, but make it incompatible with IA.
+1@DestinyAviation thanks for spotlight my little Fokker :D
@Gestour My beautifull ignorance... I was convinced that a rev counter collecting data from "thrust" was easy. :D
BTW thanks again for the instrument mod and the pilot one, I love them.
+1@F4f879 you are welcome 😊
@F4f879 You must write "! [] (imagelink)" (without spaces)
@ChiChiWerx Yes, I tried 450, 600, 800 and 1000 Hp options, and the two better are 450 and 1000. The first is slow and majestic, but a bit unbalanced and hard to fly. The last is fun to fly around the islands, and is "simple", as the game is born. :D
@Gestour In this original plane the right instrument it's a rev counter, and it's missing in the mod... do you think it's a possible add?
@Gestour Thanks mate.
@Carbonfox1 thanks men. 😆
@ChiChiWerx :) Thanks. Really is not "drag" but "friction", due the nature of item (it's an half sphere, and I raised the friction on 1000% if I'm not wrong) So the drag in air is 0, and when it touch it slow down and keep the plane in line.
Yes, is faster, but I chosed to relased it at 1000 HP. Setting it at 450 HP you will see how was the 2nd alternative.
@TheMutePaper As usual, but this is not a perfect solution. Like this: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/o1n80Z/Airco-DH-2
@ThePrototype my fokker probably will shot dow this too. 😆
With italian flag colours? :)
@AviownCorp I agree. I posted it only to avoid the "you can do this in 3 pieces", but... :(
+1@AviownCorp https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/0vQ0W5/Delta-wing-with-rectangular-surfaces
Obviously (before someone lift his hand and say "you can do it") we know that with 3/5 pieces instead one you can achieve it.
+1Absolutelly and strongly AGREE.
+1@flyingsteve88 The question is... why not, expecially with the suggested mods?
We can do things like this: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/n826eX/Spad-VII-Replica-2018
@grantflys Not with the modificatio I sugested... the moddable corners and the prop diameter/blade number are needed to be really used. :)
@PhantomBladeCorp
Actually I understood very well. Mine was "irony" (do you know what it is?)
I was wondering why you had not done one of these two things, if the creation in your opinion was inappropriate: Report it as such (which would have been perfect, since it would have made it appear right under the nose of Andrew Garrison) or ignored completely if not You were in agreement with the chosen method.
And give an eye to my creations, and wonder if I need the few points of this... especially as already platinum.
@ballisticbullets Just tried. :( The idea is beautifull, but sadly the T1000 sound is at least 10 times louder, and cancell any other old prop. I tried to put it directly under the cockpit, to hear the sound at least in first person view, but... no way. :( But good attempt.
@BroAeronautics Oh... I understand. But maybe it work in same way. :)
@Chancey21 two... the thiny one is for 25 years anniversary. :P
@BroAeronautics normal 80 grs copy paper is cheap and perfect, the light of the lcd monitor made it translucent.
@lolcreeper45 @TMach5 @The3Box6With0AXOnIt Thanks mates
@PhantomBladeCorp OK, we understand you dont want the modified old prop back.
@RussianAS People like my idea and want the old engine back.
@AWESOMENESS360 thanks
+1@Zippy6 Maybe you live in the 21th century... cloche it's desuete.
@Zippy6 cloche, the stick. :)
@Chancey21 first time the vid, then the mod page when clicked 2nd time.
I have no idea why it's a successor of another plane (mine). :)
@Chancey21 Old school boy for old school methods. :)
@PanKlex204 Me too, but with the modification I suggested in the post it will be a must...
@BigBoiPlanes @DerekSP thanks anyway. :D
@Jetliner101 I hope not. :D
@Chancey21 I cant help you, in the tournament there was not. My advice is to publish it anyway as an entry, it will be interesting to see and in the worst case you will make a second without that system.
@Chancey21 The father of this is the winner of the ONLY glider tournament ever made by jundroo, and I asked to put it as "Propulsion method", but AndrewGarrison let this be legal. :) So I winned, and this, at least for Jundroo, is not a propulsion method but a high tech glider.