It is not cheap making brand new cruisers and destroyers. The US doesn’t have that much money to be spending on useless new ships that are not needed yet.
Again, what’s wrong with the Ticonderoga? It is pretty modern and it’s armament is quite sufficient. In fact, I think the Ticonderoga’s armament is much more effective that that of the Zumwalt. Especially when it comes to price.
Also, this is not the first time two nuclear nations have fought one another. China and India have both had smaller conflicts in the past year along with Pakistan and India just earlier this year.
Also, what’s wrong with the Ticonderoga? It is pretty modern and it’s armament is quite sufficient. In fact, I think the Ticonderoga’s armament is much more effective that that of the Zumwalt. Especially when it comes to price.
Before you read the rest of this comment, please understand that I mean no offense in any way.
My suggestions:
1. The wings are quite nice but what happened to the tailplane and the vertical stabilizer? I honestly think you could’ve done better than that.
2. Auto-pitch. The auto-pitch on this plane doesn’t make it too fun to fly. There are a variety of methods which you could’ve used to fix this problem. Some of which include angled wings, dead weight, adjustments in engine power, etc.
3. Yaw is... interesting. Yes, I know that realistic, functioning yaw can be hard to do in SimplePlanes, but again, there are always ways to do it. For yaw surfaces, I normally just use trial and error, placing the yaw surface in different locations until it serves its function correctly.
4. Details, details, details. Yes, details may add a lot of parts to your plane, but they sure do make it look better. For example, your drop tanks are quite plane and could’ve used a little more work. Also, the rear is a bit messy and I think you could’ve made it better.
Many of these problems, big or small, could’ve been fixed in a matter of minutes. I hope to see some improvement in the future. Good luck!
@belugasub Who?
Also, nice crane.
Oops. Wrong account.
I am at the top of the Agricultural tag. 😎
@Lahoski107 Speaking of corvettes, I have made one but cannot upload until my ban expires on my main account.
@Lahoski107 Eh, I’m not too sure. We just don’t really need them I guess.
@Lahoski107 I guess you could say that lol
@Lahoski107 Search Hyper Velocity Projectile.
It is not cheap making brand new cruisers and destroyers. The US doesn’t have that much money to be spending on useless new ships that are not needed yet.
@Lahoski107 Well, you are in luck. In recent years, they developed a new round which can reach 35 miles.
@Lahoski107 How much range do you think is needed?
@Lahoski107 Why is that?
@Lahoski107 The AGS is quite pricey. Especially the ammunition which is used. I see nothing wrong with the newer Mk. 45 systems.
This is a matter of maintaining said vessels. Ticonderoga is quite modern and does not need a replacement.
Again, what’s wrong with the Ticonderoga? It is pretty modern and it’s armament is quite sufficient. In fact, I think the Ticonderoga’s armament is much more effective that that of the Zumwalt. Especially when it comes to price.
@JamesBleriot The problem with lasers is that they require a lot of electricity and can only engage one target at once.
@JamesBleriot They still fought. I doubt we will enter a war with Iran.
@JamesBleriot I do not know of any country that would let their nuclear weapons “rust away”.
@JamesBleriot Even with lasers, I still believe it is a waste of money. It’s lack of any dedicated CIW system makes it quite susceptible to attack.
Also, this is not the first time two nuclear nations have fought one another. China and India have both had smaller conflicts in the past year along with Pakistan and India just earlier this year.
@JamesBleriot Perhaps you are correct about the cancellation of the Zumwalt, but I still believe it is a waste of money.
Also, what’s wrong with the Ticonderoga? It is pretty modern and it’s armament is quite sufficient. In fact, I think the Ticonderoga’s armament is much more effective that that of the Zumwalt. Especially when it comes to price.
@JamesBleriot They haven’t canceled the Zumwalt. They plan on building 32 of them. In my opinion, they are a giant waste of money.
@LancasterAce I like hiring assins too.
+1Plane: Sukhoi Su-57
Tank: MBT Revolution
@Nerfenthusiast Well, then the comment I wrote previously is aimed towards both Strikefighter04 and the original creator.
Before you read the rest of this comment, please understand that I mean no offense in any way.
My suggestions:
1. The wings are quite nice but what happened to the tailplane and the vertical stabilizer? I honestly think you could’ve done better than that.
2. Auto-pitch. The auto-pitch on this plane doesn’t make it too fun to fly. There are a variety of methods which you could’ve used to fix this problem. Some of which include angled wings, dead weight, adjustments in engine power, etc.
3. Yaw is... interesting. Yes, I know that realistic, functioning yaw can be hard to do in SimplePlanes, but again, there are always ways to do it. For yaw surfaces, I normally just use trial and error, placing the yaw surface in different locations until it serves its function correctly.
4. Details, details, details. Yes, details may add a lot of parts to your plane, but they sure do make it look better. For example, your drop tanks are quite plane and could’ve used a little more work. Also, the rear is a bit messy and I think you could’ve made it better.
Many of these problems, big or small, could’ve been fixed in a matter of minutes. I hope to see some improvement in the future. Good luck!
I like Star Wars too! Just look at my name. It's a blaster manufacturing company from Star Wars!
You have a follower. :)
@RebelScum
It's what Rebel Scum use!
Thank You! :) @FearlessFabEngineering
How about a replica?
This is nice!
Thanks for the spotlight! @Konade1 @Alix451 @Pilot1
Thanks you! @ColonelStriker @Konade1
Thanks you! @TAplanes
It should be called "bomb". Jk
Yep. @TheRealRDawg
Lol. Thanks! @destroyerP
Np! :)
Thank you! @TheRealTDawg
Thank you! @MechWARRIOR57 @TemDesBur @JayDay60
Thanks you! @RealQcan
Sorry. Yes... I search collaboration. @momo02
Thanks. :) @RealQcan
Thanks! @toofast2002
Thanks you @SteadfastContracting
Ok! @momo02
Thanks! @TrainDude
Thank you! @AudioDud3 @momo02 @Verterium