I think this is a feature that jundroo needs to add. It ll make the weight distribution stuff much more realistic and allow droptanks to actually have a purpose.
Funfact : I cant load up this version of the craft in simpleplanes so while shooting the trailer I had to cut the aircraft in half and attach a much simpler back end in order to record the in cockpit scene.
@AerofyI tried to do plane to plane shots, but its a bit hard to control and I ll have to experement a bit but that break away flair shot was a plane to plane shot. And most of the chase cam or orbit cam footages here are fov adjusted.
@An2k Its more like an xp55 with jets. btw I am using your parachute delay code in this. I ll obviously credit you in the main post. hope you dont mind
@232287168147825 not help I know how to install a mod, I am asking how is it now possible to install mods on android again? what changed? didnt they remove mod support in 1.9?
This, is a very good, yet strange build. The design reminds me of ww2 era bombers, yet it has jet engines, so it is obviously a post 1950 plane, but its also a torpedo bomber ,which were already almost out of fasion before the 60s, and a development of the tu14 so atleast '52 or '53
A8 SHEPHERD Test Flight
You can test this whenever you like and please let me know what you. thought about it in its comments, thanks in advance for doing this
@TheReturningHound the only stablization you'd need, atleast in simpleplanes, is the pitch stablization, and since you'd have a to move the entire stablizer wing with rotors anyway I think its possible to use 2 rotors, one for manual contol and one for the ft stablizing. If you turn the ft rotor off while making manual control and turn it on when its off and make it maintain its current pitch and yawrate then I think it wont be unresponsive anymore
Why the Dark black exhaust tho? I mean sure some types of turbinejet engines do produce only black exhaust but I dont think that much black smoke comes out of any jet engine
@jamesPLANESii Would you be intrested in doing this, cause your corrections have helped me in the past and even in this plane and I would value your opinion.
@FatEgg inspired from that, yeah, thats a beautiful plane. This one is a fictional concept, what if xp 55 was re devoloped in the early jet ages cause it already had a swept wing & rear powerplant design
@jamesPLANESii Yeah, allright.. I have to make flaps anyway so it would make more sense that outside ailerons are the roll ones, but this isnt a prop plane tho, its an early jet.
@Aerofy no matter how much effort you had put into designing a plane realistically, a low effort P51 replica or any other replica with much less detail will get more upvotes. Unless you are a platinum user with a large follower base, in which case you can build whatever you like and not worry about the post getting burried
To complete what @Aerofy said:
"welcome to simpleplanes. Looks and presentations are everything. and if you are on ios or android, then tough luck lol"
I think this is a feature that jundroo needs to add. It ll make the weight distribution stuff much more realistic and allow droptanks to actually have a purpose.
@UFNNICF5TF I dont think you can dictate how I speak just cause you dont like it but sure. I ll leave.
+1@UFNNICF5TF what
I am on with the no hate speech message but if you think google translater will help you understand all the languages then buddy you are wrong.
Check it out for yourself
You joining Bogdan's pacific challenge?
@Keesler thanks but I doubt it. fictional planes dont do very well in terms of upvotes.
+1Funfact : I cant load up this version of the craft in simpleplanes so while shooting the trailer I had to cut the aircraft in half and attach a much simpler back end in order to record the in cockpit scene.
@USSR @jamesPLANESii @TheReturningHound
@Hellosss38 @Fartspoppop @FatEgg
@AerofyI tried to do plane to plane shots, but its a bit hard to control and I ll have to experement a bit but that break away flair shot was a plane to plane shot. And most of the chase cam or orbit cam footages here are fov adjusted.
@An2k Tag me on your post
@Fartspoppop thanks :D
@An2k Its more like an xp55 with jets. btw I am using your parachute delay code in this. I ll obviously credit you in the main post. hope you dont mind
@Aerofy I know, and freecam would've helped too. But they arent supported in 1.9 mobile
@TheSolarFlare @KrAkenAtomic Thanks Dudes :D
+1This is the first time I am making something like this. Let me know how it looks
what do you mean "properly"?
@232287168147825 not help I know how to install a mod, I am asking how is it now possible to install mods on android again? what changed? didnt they remove mod support in 1.9?
+1@232287168147825
how?This is for pre 1.9 right? or do they support 1.9 somehow?
This, is a very good, yet strange build. The design reminds me of ww2 era bombers, yet it has jet engines, so it is obviously a post 1950 plane, but its also a torpedo bomber ,which were already almost out of fasion before the 60s, and a development of the tu14 so atleast '52 or '53
@jamesPLANESii I posted the link on you less detailed plane series announcement post. Thanks a ton for doing this.
A8 SHEPHERD Test Flight
You can test this whenever you like and please let me know what you. thought about it in its comments, thanks in advance for doing this
@Hellosss38 posted the link in your ps4 logo teaser
Either put the cocaine back or leave coke alone
A8 Shepherd
You wanted to test fly the aircraft and here it is. I like your logos btw, the reddit one is neat.
@TheReturningHound Think it over, a doge point is a big deal.
(also I miiiiggggghht just be able to help
@TheReturningHound the only stablization you'd need, atleast in simpleplanes, is the pitch stablization, and since you'd have a to move the entire stablizer wing with rotors anyway I think its possible to use 2 rotors, one for manual contol and one for the ft stablizing. If you turn the ft rotor off while making manual control and turn it on when its off and make it maintain its current pitch and yawrate then I think it wont be unresponsive anymore
I ll give you doge points if you manage to make it super unstable and then use a crap ton of funky trees to make it stable again.
+1also T
oh
o h n ow h a t h a v e y o u d o n e
+1Why the Dark black exhaust tho? I mean sure some types of turbinejet engines do produce only black exhaust but I dont think that much black smoke comes out of any jet engine
A8 Shepherd
hey dude, its that test flight thing, be sure to let me know your thoughts afterward
@F4f879 Ofcourse, I ll just post the link in one of your forum posts
@Bob9998 lol, nice build btw
@Prowilliam476 yeah you can, just go to the forums then click on the announcement tag and then press new post
A8 SHEPHERD
Hey bud, here's the aircraft for you to test flight, write down your thoughts in the comments of the craft after that please.
@jamesPLANESii Would you be intrested in doing this, cause your corrections have helped me in the past and even in this plane and I would value your opinion.
ah sh*t I dont think the gifs loading in
The amount of detail this has is wrinkling my brain
+1@FatEgg inspired from that, yeah, thats a beautiful plane. This one is a fictional concept, what if xp 55 was re devoloped in the early jet ages cause it already had a swept wing & rear powerplant design
+1@jamesPLANESii Yeah, allright.. I have to make flaps anyway so it would make more sense that outside ailerons are the roll ones, but this isnt a prop plane tho, its an early jet.
@TheMachinist Good call. I have to fix it then.
@Aerofy no matter how much effort you had put into designing a plane realistically, a low effort P51 replica or any other replica with much less detail will get more upvotes. Unless you are a platinum user with a large follower base, in which case you can build whatever you like and not worry about the post getting burried
+1This is really well made, looking forward to seeing the 4chan logo next.
To complete what @Aerofy said:
+2"welcome to simpleplanes. Looks and presentations are everything. and if you are on ios or android, then tough luck lol"
I mean it has some intresting air mechanics, cause as you go higher the air gets thinner and thinner until your control surfaces dont work anymore.
@Hellosss38 yup, looks pretty good.
@Mustangfastback thats an anti spam thing and its why the entire website isnt flooded with low effort creations
+3scp logo is the easiest one of em. you didnt even draw the outer ring.
+1