@dootdootbananabus
I know you were trying hard,but I would like to see some, say, decent-quality work, at least.
But everyone had his own taste. That is why I gave this upvote.
@Strikefighter04
Quite a decent build...until I realized that the size (wing versus height) wasn't as good, and that the tail was.........
Still, a good build.
@KerlonceauxIndistries
I see your creation was something similar to mine, talking over appearance and the amount of upvotes. Too bad.
Actually, some looked really neat, but I'd like a few more upvotes from you before I can give more to you (some of my stuff is REALLY good, but some of yours too, like your ship.)
@planecreator600
Download a plane with it (I have a plane, and this is the one too) and save the engine as a sub assembly to use it later.
@boxglow
You sure about the aileron and the elevator?
@Speedhunter
BUT, as long as you can get your hand onto any of the 3D printers (and beleive me, there are more 3D printing retailers than there are stores selling Simpleplanes)
Try Amazon, or E-bay.
@leehopard
Damn this thing is awesome!
Gyroscopic sight! Mmmm...
I loooove the track you put up. Fantastic.
I guess the engine is for...the gas turbine?
the SWITCH is THE MOST selled console in 2017.
NINTENDO was doing a great job.
BUT, I woud still play Simpleplanes on PC (you can attatch awesome controller--RC controller to the PC!).
At least, my RC remote can.
3D print it.
Hey, half the reason I BOUGHT this game is because you can build something (very good-looking) and then export as 3D file and print it.
How awesome is that?
@JohnnyBoythePilot
I was near tests and I am playing SimplePlanes not very often.
I am studying abroad, so I cannot connect to U.S. server in World of Tanks. I do occasionally go to battles when the internet is exceptionally great--like, once a week.
Erm...you playing WOT blitz or WOT?
BattleTag: CDR_Xavier
@RailfanEthan
Why the heck haven't I to be thinking about having rockets as ammo? Why is everyones cannon from boom 25s?
Well, rockets are simpler, but pack less a punch. They also have straight tragectory, unlike the bombs. But bombs are lot more difficult to make.
Hmmm...
@AndrewGarrison
You could say that a mod with over 15,000 download get added to the game, if you can't come up with anything new.
I would say that the sphere now may had came from a pinball mod (which I stumbled upon after the introduction of spheres)
@stig27
Can't agree more.
Yes' and no's.
~~But a lot of awesome things may be useles for some other people~~
This WOULD be a good compensation for things like...piston-powered propellers, that have higher fuel effciency, and the propellers have a fixed rpm and a very low efficiency anyway.
@4Dimensionals
If it do not worrk under water, then someone should make it so it work under water.
ENGINE, however, shouldn't be under water, though.
@RailfanEthan
The rotator instant-start things, which is actually bad
And they are not infinite still, it is just a very high rotation number. (maybe?)
So when say it rotated 10 times when you throttle up it will rotate 10 times backward when you try to brake.
That is why my Sphero use direct-driven piston engines.
It DO provide good torque...
But NOW, you have gun engines coming up. Hmmm...
Looks really nice on the front and other places, but...the fuslage (the plane body) was a bit too long on the sides
Quite nice. I especially like the gun and the landing gear. Good job!
@Gestour
Interesting that I won't be calling it something too complicated, but it was on the other hand well made.
HINT: use wing segments instead of fuselage for the black and white strips
@Lankanski
Quite good. (there aren't much option for under-water propulsion)
Yep. Turret is a bit too big (in the rear)
And torpedoes was attatched to the ship underwater....
@breitling
No because the main mast (the stick that hold it up) was mirrored the times, so it would be 1 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2(assume you mirrored ten times) * 2 (two segments)
so the entire pole took up 2048 parts.
FIX THAT! I fixed it after like a dozen crashes and two hours(trying to remove all of the 2048 obviously failed, so I just made a new one that looked identical)
Plus some better stuff...
@breitling
I know but 2000 parts...the light make up like, 30 parts, and window make up...20 parts. I give the ship 100 parts.
You know why?
The main antenna(the highest pole) counts as 2,000 part for some reason...
And I took the main antenna/mask/pole out and it is a 200 build.
Hmm....
IF it is a bit more wider, then this thing will almost be certain to be able to conquer every piece of hill out there.
Oh, and take the center of mass into account...
@MethaManAircraft
Never mind...
@RailfanEthan
I assume you have the rotor-powered-car challenge?
@dootdootbananabus
I know you were trying hard,but I would like to see some, say, decent-quality work, at least.
But everyone had his own taste. That is why I gave this upvote.
@Strikefighter04
+1Quite a decent build...until I realized that the size (wing versus height) wasn't as good, and that the tail was.........
Still, a good build.
@MethaManAircraft
This is actually an entry for the "no-wheels" car challenge for yours..
@KerlonceauxIndistries
I see your creation was something similar to mine, talking over appearance and the amount of upvotes. Too bad.
Actually, some looked really neat, but I'd like a few more upvotes from you before I can give more to you (some of my stuff is REALLY good, but some of yours too, like your ship.)
@planecreator600
Download a plane with it (I have a plane, and this is the one too) and save the engine as a sub assembly to use it later.
@boxglow
You sure about the aileron and the elevator?
@Speedhunter
BUT, as long as you can get your hand onto any of the 3D printers (and beleive me, there are more 3D printing retailers than there are stores selling Simpleplanes)
Try Amazon, or E-bay.
@MethaManAircraft
I bet there are other things I can modify for you...
This is one of the best planes I have had that use gun engines.
Tiny tiny.
Quite neat.
@RailfanEthan
Hence, "explosive crayons"
@JakeTheDogg
+1Make a turret, then set the rotators to free spin. Then add a gyroscope and configure it.
This is damn clever...
@leehopard
+1Damn this thing is awesome!
Gyroscopic sight! Mmmm...
I loooove the track you put up. Fantastic.
I guess the engine is for...the gas turbine?
the SWITCH is THE MOST selled console in 2017.
NINTENDO was doing a great job.
BUT, I woud still play Simpleplanes on PC (you can attatch awesome controller--RC controller to the PC!).
At least, my RC remote can.
3D print it.
Hey, half the reason I BOUGHT this game is because you can build something (very good-looking) and then export as 3D file and print it.
How awesome is that?
@JohnnyBoythePilot
I was near tests and I am playing SimplePlanes not very often.
I am studying abroad, so I cannot connect to U.S. server in World of Tanks. I do occasionally go to battles when the internet is exceptionally great--like, once a week.
Erm...you playing WOT blitz or WOT?
BattleTag: CDR_Xavier
@RailfanEthan
Why the heck haven't I to be thinking about having rockets as ammo? Why is everyones cannon from boom 25s?
Well, rockets are simpler, but pack less a punch. They also have straight tragectory, unlike the bombs. But bombs are lot more difficult to make.
Hmmm...
@RailfanEthan
I can see it is loosely based on M10 Wolverine
Man I can't wait to get it...
@Notapier
Oh! That was nice!
@FriskySans922
+1I guess those are fine, too, if you managed to pull a track one off without any wheels
Ooo..walker!
@RailfanEthan
It actually won't be that easy...
But how hard is it to use a rotator?
@AndrewGarrison
You could say that a mod with over 15,000 download get added to the game, if you can't come up with anything new.
I would say that the sphere now may had came from a pinball mod (which I stumbled upon after the introduction of spheres)
@stig27
Can't agree more.
Yes' and no's.
~~But a lot of awesome things may be useles for some other people~~
This WOULD be a good compensation for things like...piston-powered propellers, that have higher fuel effciency, and the propellers have a fixed rpm and a very low efficiency anyway.
@4Dimensionals
If it do not worrk under water, then someone should make it so it work under water.
ENGINE, however, shouldn't be under water, though.
@RailfanEthan
The rotator instant-start things, which is actually bad
And they are not infinite still, it is just a very high rotation number. (maybe?)
So when say it rotated 10 times when you throttle up it will rotate 10 times backward when you try to brake.
That is why my Sphero use direct-driven piston engines.
It DO provide good torque...
But NOW, you have gun engines coming up. Hmmm...
@Lankanski
But then you said you cannot fit the mechanism inside.
It is reasonable still. M10 Wolverine have something similar in the look anyway.
@Notapier
?
Look? Review? Testing?
Why do you call me for?
@GreatHenry
You from Russia?
Looks quite decent. Would be a good UAV/
Disagree. The grimace is so much faster.
A little over 100 parts....good job!
+1I didn't know the existence of Cezzna 152. Interesting...
They put them on the smallest tanks during WWII.
Looks really nice on the front and other places, but...the fuslage (the plane body) was a bit too long on the sides
Quite nice. I especially like the gun and the landing gear. Good job!
@Shocktrooper7591
People knows that.
That propeller goes to @Visify
This one is hardly a little bugger, beside the familiar suspension...
Look at that steering wheel and the lights!
DECENT.
The real world F1s seems to be AWDs...
@Gestour
Interesting that I won't be calling it something too complicated, but it was on the other hand well made.
HINT: use wing segments instead of fuselage for the black and white strips
Rather, flying bandit truck.
@Lankanski
PC (windows) and iOS.
I mean the turret's back was a bit too big
@SkipperBing
+1Murphy? Where is that?
And I assume the green object on a stick in the front of the car is...a christmas tree? ?.?.?????
@sexylips35
+1DON'T RUN THIS ON YOUR 3-YEAR-OLD PHONE....You will BREAK it!
@TessemiI guess the part count give it away...
@Lankanski
Quite good. (there aren't much option for under-water propulsion)
Yep. Turret is a bit too big (in the rear)
And torpedoes was attatched to the ship underwater....
@breitling I fixed it but is waiting for the 24 hours...
Looks quite good.
+1Don't use the stupid gyro when climbing hills!
@breitling
No because the main mast (the stick that hold it up) was mirrored the times, so it would be 1 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2(assume you mirrored ten times) * 2 (two segments)
so the entire pole took up 2048 parts.
FIX THAT! I fixed it after like a dozen crashes and two hours(trying to remove all of the 2048 obviously failed, so I just made a new one that looked identical)
Plus some better stuff...
@breitling
I know but 2000 parts...the light make up like, 30 parts, and window make up...20 parts. I give the ship 100 parts.
You know why?
The main antenna(the highest pole) counts as 2,000 part for some reason...
And I took the main antenna/mask/pole out and it is a 200 build.
Hmm....
@Wolfieboy155
Your gravatar looks familiar....
IF it is a bit more wider, then this thing will almost be certain to be able to conquer every piece of hill out there.
Oh, and take the center of mass into account...
@breitling
Explain why are there 2500 parts
I thought ZiS-6 was the Russian high-velocity anti-tank gun...
Well this truck IS called ZiS-6.
Mind putting a ZiS-6 gun onto it?