i mean the A-10 isnt a strike aircraft its CAS lol if you want strike aircraft that F-15 fits in nicely and the F-35 would be as well. but i guess it depends on your definition of strike aircraft and if you really mean attack aircraft
make sure that engine power is exact then tune those drag points for acceleration and top speed. Might be a bit difficult if you limit speed with simulated wing drag tho
its not an engine problem its a drag points problem it should be between 1-2k on this plane unless the air brake is already adding some drag while in stable flight idk how you have it set up @CptLiar
he also attempts to make my boat his own by saying its a "fictional build from Indonesia" when its no such thing its my boat he just added one or two things i have reported this as there are no significant changes. doing cheap work and passing it off as you own is unethical and against the rules @Dathcha
if you use someone elses craft you should give them credit in the desc as well its just good etiquette especially since he barely changed anything. @Dathcha
very good love all the functions thats always the best part of planes but you flight model regarding drag and thrust makes it perform unrealistically. Link to a guide to make your planes better. This is very impressive by the way.
@BaconAircraft dear god not that movie lol Col. Burton is a buffoon most of that movie is a lie. if you would like more info i suggest this youtube video very much worth the watch :)
basically if you upload a build that has a few bugs and you didnt realize it instead of having to make a new post with the updated version you can just paste your new and updated code to fix the bug @Sm10684
@dhtv587 Oh actually I have been working on an f-22 its just hard for me to finish projects with so much on my plate. Ill make sure to tag you on it when it comes out since you are clearly such a fan.
@dhtv587 you tried to make a replica, you should strive for accuracy. The definition for replica states "an exact copy or model of something, especially one on a smaller scale." including flight model. I also noticed you have backtracked away from your original claim of your plane flying better than everyone else's. Your fighter flies poorly anyways it rolls when you pitch and is very hard to control. You should at least make a plane that you can control XD
@dhtv587 yes this is real data I have accumulated from many sources including f-16.net and many other places. BTW IRL its very hard to turn a fighter jet XD. my f-16 and t-38 have realistic instantaneous turn rates and sustained turn rates ive tested them with the debug console so I know what I am talking about.
PLEASE THEY ARE ANNOYING FOR EVERYONE ELSE WHO HAS SOMETHING TO OFFER
+2Does the shuttle detach I can’t seem to make it do so
+2ye i ask ppl to follow instead
+1i mean the A-10 isnt a strike aircraft its CAS lol if you want strike aircraft that F-15 fits in nicely and the F-35 would be as well. but i guess it depends on your definition of strike aircraft and if you really mean attack aircraft
+110/10 very good job very rare to see this quality in a build
+1make sure that engine power is exact then tune those drag points for acceleration and top speed. Might be a bit difficult if you limit speed with simulated wing drag tho
+1C model?
+1@Kangy lol
+1nah i project i put out b4 you posted this. you mentioned this a while ago i guess i just forgot to reach out for a cinematic. @ollielebananiaCFSP
+1its not an engine problem its a drag points problem it should be between 1-2k on this plane unless the air brake is already adding some drag while in stable flight idk how you have it set up @CptLiar
+1i forgor prolly woulda help with upvotes on the last post
+1@PointlessWhyshouldi
+1tags are all ppl who showed interest
+1@Kangy
+1@PoinX25tlessWhyShouldI
@Destroyerz117
@goboygo1
+1@BeastHunter
@Krmo
very german yes
+1bro 💀 lmfao @asteroidbook345
+1feels like abt to walk out onto a regular show sized april fools joke
+1he also attempts to make my boat his own by saying its a "fictional build from Indonesia" when its no such thing its my boat he just added one or two things i have reported this as there are no significant changes. doing cheap work and passing it off as you own is unethical and against the rules @Dathcha
+1if you use someone elses craft you should give them credit in the desc as well its just good etiquette especially since he barely changed anything. @Dathcha
+1very good love all the functions thats always the best part of planes but you flight model regarding drag and thrust makes it perform unrealistically. Link to a guide to make your planes better. This is very impressive by the way.
+1@BaconAircraft dear god not that movie lol Col. Burton is a buffoon most of that movie is a lie. if you would like more info i suggest this youtube video very much worth the watch :)
+1@Gramgramofficial field artillery variant link in desc
+1cant even fly it way too unstable
+1you are going to use the ammo function but thats pretty much it
+1or Su-33
+1basically if you upload a build that has a few bugs and you didnt realize it instead of having to make a new post with the updated version you can just paste your new and updated code to fix the bug @Sm10684
+1-_-
+1damn.
logic everywhere.
SmOoTh NeEdS tO bE oN
+1@LieutenantSOT i live in kansas now lmfao
+1the whole point was to not do that and im not gonna do it just bc one person asked for it redoing this would take days of work @simpleaerospace
+1@ReinMcDeer highest rated all-time pages? if anything you can prob get the metric from the devs
+1what control board is it based on is it the one in the F-18?
+1maybe bc this community picks on ppl for the smallest thing. this place is a call of duty lobby without swear words.
+1cool fact: they dumped cesium into the fuel to creat a RAM cloud when the fuel was burned to mask the radar signature of the aircraft from the back
+1no
+1needs to be longer no real plane could be squished like that
+1I hereby name them: all
+1damn it i was working on one and was almost done except for tuning the PID cuz i suck at FT
+1cool bro
+1ill support that @realSavageMan
+13rd picture for thumbnail great shots btw
+1aight im done with drawing lmao
+1@dhtv587 I already told you I'm done arguing with you you're just making yourself look much worse by grasping at straws
+1XD @Kangy
+1@dhtv587 Oh actually I have been working on an f-22 its just hard for me to finish projects with so much on my plate. Ill make sure to tag you on it when it comes out since you are clearly such a fan.
+1@dhtv587 you tried to make a replica, you should strive for accuracy. The definition for replica states "an exact copy or model of something, especially one on a smaller scale." including flight model. I also noticed you have backtracked away from your original claim of your plane flying better than everyone else's. Your fighter flies poorly anyways it rolls when you pitch and is very hard to control. You should at least make a plane that you can control XD
+1@dhtv587 yes this is real data I have accumulated from many sources including f-16.net and many other places. BTW IRL its very hard to turn a fighter jet XD. my f-16 and t-38 have realistic instantaneous turn rates and sustained turn rates ive tested them with the debug console so I know what I am talking about.
+1@Kangy thnx :)
+1absolute horse shit buddy
+1